Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:45:22.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

LO25: The development and implementation of a standardized emergency department handover tool

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2018

E. S. H. Kwok*
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ottawa, ON
G. Clapham
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ottawa, ON
S. White
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ottawa, ON
M. Austin
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ottawa, ON
L. Calder
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ottawa, ON
*
*Corresponding author

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Introduction: There is a high risk for communication breakdown, discontinuity of clinical care, and medical errors during ED physician handover. Locally, there is no standardized handover process to ensure adequate communication of critical information. Our aim was to use a locally developed handover tool to increase frequency of adequate physician handover during overnight shift change by 50% in 4 months. Methods: Using published best practices, local observational data, and stakeholder input, we determined critical components of ED handovers. We developed a structured communication tool for two unique populations in our ED: ED-VITAL for patients receiving active ED care; ED-VSA for patients who are admitted/referred. Strategies used to implement the tool included: engagement of staff physicians to introduce & modify the tool; formal education and training to ED residents; and provision of cognitive aids. A QI coordinator conducted direct observations of handovers using convenience sampling. We provided feedback to staff and resident physicians, and used their input to continuously modify the tool. The main outcome measure was adequate patient handover, defined as verbal communication of 50% of critical handover components, or documentation of key information on an electronic note. Process measures included tool utilization characteristics. Balance measures included time metrics such as handover duration. We present run charts and qualitative statistics. Results: We assessed 368 individual patient handovers (93 pre- & 275 post-implementation). The median proportion of patients in active ED care who were verbally handed over increased from 75% to 100%. The median proportion of adequate handovers improved from 50% to 72%. The time to deliver handover increased by 13 seconds per patient. Qualitative feedback from end users was positive overall, particularly for communication quality and resident educational value. Conclusion: Use of a standardized handover tool improved both verbal and documented communication during shift change. A customized approach, sensitive to local context, was important to successful implementation. Residents play a large role in handovers; strategies to improve handover processes that emphasize medical education appear to enhance success. Future PDSA cycles will focus on interventions to further enhance the utilization of the tool, and to measure direct impact on clinical outcomes.

Type
Oral Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2018