Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T00:11:34.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

LO10: Quantity of opioid to prescribe for acute pain to limit misuse after emergency department discharge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2017

R. Daoust*
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC
J. Paquet
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC
E. Piette
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC
J. Morris
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC
A. Cournoyer
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC
M. Émond
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC
S. Gosselin
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC
J.S. Lee
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC
G. Lavigne
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC
J. Chauny
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC
*
*Corresponding authors

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Introduction: A 2008 survey found that 1.9% of the entire US population was using prescription pain medication non-medically and that 56% obtained them from a friend or relatives. Diversion of pain medication may occur when a portion of the prescription is unused for pain relief after an ED visit. We hypothesized that at least 10 pills (~40%) of an opioid prescription 2 weeks after an ED visit, will not be consumed and become available for potential misuse. Objective: Determine the quantity of unused opioids pills for common acute pain diagnoses, 2 weeks after an ED visit for acute pain. Methods: Prospective observational cohort study of consecutive ED patients from a tertiary academic urban hospital with 60,000 ED visits annually. Inclusion criteria: aged ≥18 years, acute pain conditions present ≤2 weeks, pain intensity at triage of ≥4 (on a 0-10 numeric rating scale; NRS), and discharged with a new opioid prescription. ED physicians identified (24/7) eligible patients. They recorded the pain complaint/location, the final diagnosis, the quantity and type of prescribed pain medication. Discharged patients completed paper or electronic 14-day diary (REDCap database) to document their pain medication consumption. As a mitigation strategy, they were also contacted by phone at 2 weeks for the same information. A paired t-test was used to test the difference between the amounts of opioids prescribed and consumed. Results: 350 patients were recruited. Mean age 50 (SD ±16) and 54.2% were men. Painful diagnosis: fracture (18.2%), acute back pain (15.3%), renal colic (15.3%), Sprain (excluding back/neck pain) (6.9%), Contusion (6.4%), acute neck pain (5.8%), abdominal pain (4.9%), and other (27.2%). Opioids prescribed: oxycodone (47%), morphine (37%) and hydromorphone (16%). Means quantity of opioid pills prescribed: 24 (IC95%: 23-26). Filled opioid prescription: 92%. Means quantity of opioid pills consumed: 8 (IC95%: 7-9). Means quantity of unused opioids pills: 16. Opioid pills available for misuse in our cohort: 5,600 pills. Conclusion: After an ED visit for acute pain a significant portion of opioids prescribed is unused and available for misuse. A large pragmatic study should be done to confirm that an opioid prescription strategy based on our results will limit unused opioid pills while maintaining pain relief.

Keywords

Type
Oral Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2017