Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T00:02:57.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is it more accurate to measure the absolute or the relative change of new high or ultrasensitive troponin assays to diagnose acute myocardial infarction?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2015

Rohit Mohindra  and
Carine Haggar
Rohit Mohindra*
Affiliation:
FRCPC Emergency Medicine Residency Program, McGill University
Carine Haggar
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC
*
McGill University FRCPC Emergency Medicine Residency Program, Royal Victoria Hospital, Room A4.62, 687 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, QC H3H 1A1; [email protected]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

acute myocardial infarctiondiagnostic accuracyemergency departmenthigh-sensitivity troponin
Type
Knowledge To Practice • Des connaissances à la pratique
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , July 2014 , pp. 323 - 326
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2014

References

REFERENCES

1. Thygesen, K, Alpert, JS, White, HD. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:2173–95, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.011.Google Scholar
2. Omland, T. Sensitive cardiac troponin assays: sense and sensibility. Eur Heart J 2012;33:944–6, doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs009.Google Scholar
3. Antman, EM, Anbe, DT, Armstrong, PW, et al. The management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force. Circulation 2004;110:e82–292, doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000134791.68010.FA.Google Scholar
4. Reichlin, T, Hochholzer, W, Bassetti, S, et al. Early diagnosis of myocardial infarction with sensitive cardiac troponin assays. N Engl J Med 2009;361:858–67, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0900428.Google Scholar
5. Thygesen, K, Mair, J, Katus, H, et al. Recommendations for the use of cardiac troponin measurement in acute cardiac care. Eur Heart J 2010;31:2197–204, doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehq251.Google Scholar
6. Whiting, P, Rutjes, AWS, Reitsma, JB, et al. Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:189–202, doi:10.7326/0003-4819-140-3-200402030-00010.Google Scholar
7. Rutjes, AWS, Reitsma, JB, Di Nisio, M, et al. Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies. Can Med Assoc J 2006;174:469–76, doi:10.1503/cmaj.050090.Google Scholar
8. Bekelman, JE. Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review. JAMA 2003;289:454–65, doi:10.1001/jama.289.4.454.Google Scholar
9. Mueller, M, Biener, M, Vafaie, M, et al. Absolute and relative kinetic changes of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T in acute coronary syndrome and in patients with increased troponin in the absence of acute coronary syndrome. Clin Chem 2012;58:209–18, doi:10.1373/clinchem.2011.171827.Google Scholar
10. Apple, FS. Edging closer to early optimal patient management with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assay. Circulation 2011;124:127–9, doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.038851.Google Scholar
11. Aldous, S, Richards, M, Cullen, L. Diagnostic and prognostic utility of early measurement with high-sensitivity troponin T assay in patients presenting with chest pain. Can Med Assoc J 2012;184:260–8, doi:10.1503/cmaj.110773.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Hilden, J. What properties should an overall measure of test performance possess? Clin Chem 2005;51:471; author reply 471-2, doi:10.1373/clinchem.2004.041376.Google Scholar
13. Reichlin, T, Irfan, A, Twerenbold, R, et al. Utility of absolute and relative changes in cardiac troponin concentrations in the early diagnosis of acutemyocardial infarction. Circulation 2011;124:136–45, doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.023937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Furukawa, TA, Strauss, S, Bucher, HC, Guyatt, G. Diagnostic tests. In: Guyatt, G, Rennie, D, Meade, MO, Cook, DJ, editors. Users’ guides to the medical literature: a manual for evidence-based clinical practice. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2008. p. 419–38.Google Scholar
15. Twerenbold, R, Jaffe, A, Reichlin, T, et al. High-sensitive troponin T measurements: what do we gain and what are the challenges? Eur Heart J 2012;33:579–86, doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Mangleson, FIJ, Cullen, L, Scott, AC. The evolution of chest pain pathways. Crit Pathw Cardiol 2011;10:69–75, doi:10.1097/HPC.0b013e3182215b48.Google Scholar
17. Reiter, M, Twerenbold, R, Reichlin, T, et al. Early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in the elderly using more sensitive cardiac troponin assays. Eur Heart J 2011;32:1379–89, doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Reiter, M, Twerenbold, R, Reichlin, T, et al. Early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with pre-existing coronary artery disease using more sensitive cardiac troponin assays. Eur Heart J 2012;33:988–97, doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr376.Google Scholar
19. Vasikaran, SD, Macdonald, SPJ, Sikaris, K. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays for risk stratification and for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Ann Clin Biochem 2012;49(Pt 3):209–10, doi:10.1258/acb.2012.012058.Google Scholar