Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T14:34:34.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“I never hear what happens, even if they die”: a survey of emergency physicians about outcome feedback

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Curtis F. Lavoie ,
Amy C. Plint ,
Tammy J. Clifford  and
Isabelle Gaboury
Curtis F. Lavoie*
Affiliation:
Emergency Department, Hôpital Montfort, and the Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ont.
Amy C. Plint
Affiliation:
Departments of Pediatric and Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
Tammy J. Clifford
Affiliation:
Departments of Paediatrics and Epidemiology & Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
Isabelle Gaboury
Affiliation:
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont.
*
Emergency Department, Hôpital Montfort, 713 Montreal Rd., Ottawa ON K1K 3E9; [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

Emergency physicians (EPs) rarely find out what happens to patients after the patients leave their care, a process we call “outcome feedback.” Some suggest this hinders the practice of emergency medicine (EM); however, evidence is lacking. We sought to evaluate EPs' perception of the current and potential role of outcome feedback in EM.

Methods:

We surveyed practising French- and English-speaking EPs from emergency departments within 100 km of Ottawa, Ont., in the provinces of Ontario and Quebec. The main outcomes included the prevalence, role and effect of outcome feedback.

Results:

Of the 297 physicians surveyed, 231 (77.8%) responded. The sample contained good representation of language groups, practice settings, sexes and age groups. All participants indicated that knowing outcomes is “essential” (62.6%) or “beneficial” (37.4%) to gaining experience in EM. Participants reported currently receiving passive outcome feedback in 10.0% of all cases, and seeking out (active) outcome feedback in 7.5% of all cases. The great majority of participants (97.3%) stated that they would like to receive more outcome feedback and believed that this would improve diagnostic accuracy (97.3%), clinical efficiency (85.5%), treatment outcomes (95.6%) and job satisfaction (95.1%). When asked to indicate “any possible negative effects that might arise from increased outcome feedback,” 62.1% indicated none. However, 17.9% hypothesized negative emotional effects and 11.5% suggested increased time requirements.

Conclusion:

The overwhelming majority of EPs receive very little outcome feedback. Most would like more outcome feedback and believe it would improve the practice of EM.

Keywords

treatment outcomequality of health careemergency medicinedecision support techniquesoutcome feedback
Type
Original Research • Recherche originale
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 11 , Issue 6 , November 2009 , pp. 523 - 528
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2009

References

REFERENCES

1.Wogan, JM. Emergency department follow-up of hospitalized patients. Am J Emerg Med 2000;18:510–1.Google Scholar
2.Dillman, DA. Mail and internet surveys. 2nd ed. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley and Sons; 2000.Google Scholar
3.Canadian medical directory. Toronto (ON): MDSelect; 2007.Google Scholar
4.Croskerry, P. The feedback sanction. Acad Emerg Med 2000;7:1232–8.Google Scholar