Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T09:06:50.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effectiveness of a novel training program for emergency medicine residents in ultrasound-guided insertion of central venous catheters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Michael Y. Woo*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
Jason Frank
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
A. Curtis Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
Calvin Thompson
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesia, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
Pierre Cardinal
Affiliation:
Division of Critical Care, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
Marianne Yeung
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
Jennifer Beecker
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
*
Department of Emergency Medicine, Ottawa Hospital, 1053 Carling Ave., Ottawa ON K1Y 4E9; [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

Insertion of central venous catheters (CVCs) is an essential competency for emergency physicians. Ultrasound-guided (USG) insertion of CVCs has been shown to be safer than the traditional landmark technique. There is no clear consensus on effective methods for training physicians in USG insertion of CVCs. We developed and evaluated a novel educational training program in the USG technique for insertion of CVCs.

Methods:

Sixteen emergency medicine residents volunteered for a pre- and postprogram evaluation study, which was approved by our research ethics board. After their previous experience was determined, each participant was videotaped inserting a USG CVC in the right internal jugular vein on models. Participants then reviewed a Web-based instructional module and had a practical session. Participants were again videotaped inserting a USG CVC. The primary outcome was the change in score before and after the training program, using an expert-validated performance evaluation tool used to review the videotaped performances in a blinded fashion. Participants also completed a questionnaire to measure their satisfaction with the training program and any change in their perceived competence.

Results:

Participants ranged from residency year 1 to 5. Thirteen of 16 (81%) had never attempted USG insertion of a CVC. Participants reported that the models were realistic. Performance scores (12/19 to 13.2/19) and global ratings assessments (3.5/7 to 5.5/7) improved significantly (p < 0.01; the effect size, Cohen d = 1.12 before and 1.28 after) after the instruction. There was good interrater reliability between evaluators of the videotaped performances regarding performance scores (r = 0.68) and global rating scores (r = 0.75). All participants felt their confidence and technical skills were improved (p < 0.01) and all felt satisfied with the training program.

Conclusion:

This brief innovative multimethod training program was effective in enhancing emergency medicine resident competence in USG insertion of CVCs.

Type
Education • Enseignement
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2009

References

REFERENCES

1. Raad, I. Intravascular-catheter-related infections. Lancet 1998;351:893–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Farion, K, Morrison, LJ. Redefining emergency medicine procedures: Canadian competence and frequency survey. Acad Emerg Med 2001;8:731–8.Google Scholar
3. Rivers, E, Nguyen, B, Havstad, S, et al. Early goal directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1368–77.Google Scholar
4. Merrer, J, De Johnghe, B, Golliot, F, et al. Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001;286:700–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. McGee, DC, Gould, MK. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1123–33.Google Scholar
6. Gordon, AC, Saliken, JC, Johns, D, et al. US-guided puncture of the internal jugular vein: complications and anatomic considerations. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1998;9:333–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Troianos, CA, Kuwik, RJ, Pasqual, JR, et al. Internal jugular vein and carotid artery anatomic relation as determined by ultrasonography. Anesthesiology 1996;85:43–8.Google Scholar
8. Denys, BG, Uretsky, BF. Anatomical variations of internal jugular vein location: impact on central venous access. Crit Care Med 1991;19:1516–9.Google Scholar
9. Hind, D, Calvert, N, McWilliams, R, et al. Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis. BMJ 2003;327:361.Google Scholar
10. Calvert, N, Hind, D, McWilliams, RG, et al. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ultrasound locating devices for central venous access: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health TechnolAssess 2003;7:1–84.Google Scholar
11. Miller, AH, Roth, BA, Mills, TJ, et al. Ultrasound guidance versus the landmark technique for the placement of central venous catheters in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2002;9:800–5.Google Scholar
12. Keenan, SP. Use of ultrasound to place central lines. J Crit Care 2002;17:126–37.Google Scholar
13. Fry, WR, Clagett, GC, O’Rourke, PT. Ultrasound-guided central venous access. Arch Surg 1999;134:738–40.Google Scholar
14. Randolph, AG, Cook, DJ, Gonzales, CA, et al. Ultrasound guidance for placement of central venous catheters: a meta-analysis of the literature. Crit Care Med 1996;24:2053–8.Google Scholar
15. Hilty, WM, Hudson, P, Levitt, M, et al. Real-time ultrasound-guided femoral vein catheterization during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Ann Emerg Med 1997;29:331–6.Google Scholar
16. Hrics, P, Wilber, S, Blanda, MP, et al. Ultrasound-assisted internal jugular vein catheterization in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 1998;16:401–3.Google Scholar
17. Leung, J, Duffy, M, Finckh, A. Real-time ultrasonographyically-guided internal jugular vein catheterization in the emergency department increases success rates and reduces complications: a randomized, prospective study. Ann Emerg Med 2006;48:540–7.Google Scholar
18. The National Quality Forum. Safe practices for better health care. A consensus report. Washington (DC): the Forum; 2003. Available: http://www.qualityforum.org (accessed 2009 Jun 3).Google Scholar
19. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. NICE technology appraisal guidance No.49: guidance on the use of ultrasound locating devices for placing central venous catheters. London (UK): The Institute; 2002. Available: http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia /pdf/Ultrasound_49_GUIDANCE.pdf (accessed 2009 Jun 3).Google Scholar
20. Rothschild, JM. Chapter 21. In: Ultrasound guidance of central vein catheterization. Available: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/ptsafety/pdf/chap21.pdf (accessed 28 Apr 2008).Google Scholar
21. Kirkpatrick, DL. Evaluating training programs: the four levels. 3rd ed. San Francisco (CA): Berrett-Koehler; 2006.Google Scholar
22. Dronen, SC, Younger, JG. Central venous catherization and central venous pressure monitoring. In: Clinical procedures in emergency medicine. Roberts, JR, Hedges, JR, editors. Philidel-phia (PA): WB Saunders Company; 1998. p. 358–85.Google Scholar
23. Cohen, J. The concepts of power analysis; the t-test for means. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York (NY): Laurence Erlbaum Associates; 1977. p. 1–74.Google Scholar
24. Atkinson, P, Boyle, A, Robinson, S, et al. Should ultrasound guidance be used for central venous catheterization in the emergency department. Emerg MedJ 2005;22:158–64.Google ScholarPubMed
25. Feller-Kopman, D. Ultrasound-guided internal jugular access. A proposed standardized approach and implications for training and practice. Chest 2007;132:302–9.Google Scholar
26. Bond, WF, Lammers, RL, Spillane, LL, et al. The use of simulation in emergency medicine: a research agenda. Acad Emerg Med 2007;14:353–64.Google Scholar
27. Ericsson, KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med 2004;79:S70–81.Google Scholar
28. Cook, DJ, Montori, VM, McMullin, JP, et al. Improving patients’ safety locally: changing clinician behaviour. Lancet 2004;363:1224–30.Google Scholar
29. Kovacs, G. Procedural skills in medicine: liking theory to practice. J Emerg Med 1997;15:387–91.Google Scholar