Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:31:21.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of a brief emergency medicine education course on emergency department work intensity of family physicians

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2015

Samuel Vaillancourt ,
Susan E. Schultz ,
Chad Leaver ,
Thérèse Stukel  and
Michael J. Schull
Samuel Vaillancourt*
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
Susan E. Schultz
Affiliation:
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON
Chad Leaver
Affiliation:
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON
Thérèse Stukel
Affiliation:
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON The Dartmouth Institute, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
Michael J. Schull
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
*
G1 06, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5; [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

Recently, many Canadian emergency departments (EDs) have struggled with physician staffing shortages. In 2006, the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care funded a brief “emergency medicine primer” (EMP) course for family physicians to upgrade or refresh skills, with the goal of increasing their ED work intensity. We sought to determine the effect of the EMP on the ED work intensity of family physicians.

Methods:

A retrospective longitudinal study was conducted of the ED work of 239 family physicians in the 2 years before and after a minimum of 6 months and up to 2 years from completing an EMP course in 2006 to 2008 compared to non-EMP physicians. ED work intensity was defined as the number of ED shifts per month and the number of ED patients seen per month. We conducted two analyses: a before and after comparison of all EMP physicians and a matched cohort analysis matching each EMP physician to four non-EMP physicians on sex, year of medical school graduation, rurality, and pre-EMP ED work intensity.

Results:

Postcourse, EMP physicians worked 0.5 more ED shifts per month (13% increase, p = 0.027). Compared to their matched controls, EMP physicians worked 0.7 more shifts per month (13% increase, p = 0.0032) and saw 15 more patients per month (17% increase, p = 0.0008) compared to matched non-EMP physicians. The greatest increases were among EMP physicians who were younger, were urban, had previous ED experience, or worked in a high-volume ED. The effect of the EMP course was negligible for physicians with no previous ED experience or working in rural areas.

Conclusion:

The EMP course is associated with modest increases in ED work intensity among some family physicians, in particular younger physicians in urban areas. No increase was seen among physicians without previous ED experience or working in rural areas.

Keywords

continuing medical educationemergency medicinehealth policymedically underserved areaphysician practice patternsphysician shortage arearural health services
Type
Original Research • Recherche originale
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , January 2013 , pp. 34 - 41
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2013

References

REFERENCES

1.Urquhart, I.MDs refuse emergency work. The Toronto Star. 2006 Sept 25. Available at: http://www.thestar.com/news/ontario/article/96395--mds-refuse-emergency-work (accessed September 26, 2012).Google Scholar
2.Romanow, RJ, editor. Building on values: the future of healthcare in Canada. Saskatoon (SK): Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada; 2002.Google Scholar
3.Pengelley, H.Quebec’s decision to draft MDs to work in ERs creates storm. CMAJ 2002; 167: 5.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Pong, RW. Strategies to overcome physician shortages in northern Ontario: a study of policy implementation over 35 years. Hum Resources Health 2008; 6: 24, doi:10.1186/1478-4491-6-24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Pong, RW, Pitblado, JR. Geographic distribution of physicians in Canada: beyond how many and where. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2005.Google Scholar
6.Chan, BT. Do family physicians with emergency medicine certification actually practise family medicine? CMAJ 2002; 167: 869–70.Google ScholarPubMed
7.Ontario Hospital Association, Ontario Medical Association, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Improving access to emergency care: addressing system issues. Toronto; 2006.Google Scholar
8.Chan, BT, Schull, MJ, Schultz, SE. Emergency department services in Ontario: atlas report. Toronto: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; 2001.Google Scholar
9.Statistics Canada. Population and dwelling counts, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario (city). Available at: http://www12.statcan.ca/census-recensement/2006/dp-pd/prof/92-591/details/page.cfm?Lang=5E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=3557061&Geo25PR&Code2=35&Data5Count&SearchText=Sault&SearchType=Begins&SearchPR=01&B1=All&Custom= (accessed November 19, 2009).Google Scholar
10.Pong, RW, Russell, N. A review and synthesis of strategies and policy recommendations on the rural health workforce. Sudbury (ON): Centre for Rural and Northern Health Research; 2003.Google Scholar
11.Ontario College of Family Physicians. Emergency medicine primer for family physicians. Available at: http://www.ocfp.on.ca/English/OCFP/EMPrimer07/ (accessed November 19, 2009).Google Scholar
12.Ginde, AA, Sullivan, AF, Camargo, CA. Attrition from emergency medicine clinical practice in the United States. Ann Emerg Med 2010; 56: 166–71, doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.11.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Glazier, RH, Klein-Geltink, J, Kopp, A, et al. Capitation and enhanced fee-for-service models for primary care reform: a population based evaluation. CMAJ 2009; 180: E72-81, doi:10.1503/cmaj.081316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Oxman, AD, Thomson, MA, Davis, DA, et al. No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. CMAJ 1995; 153: 1423–31.Google ScholarPubMed
15.Thomson O’’Brien, MA, Freemantle, N, Oxman, AD, et al. Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; (2): CD003030.Google Scholar
16.Rabinowitz, HK, Diamond, JJ, Markham, FW, et al. A program to increase the number of family physicians in rural and underserved areas: impact after 22 years. JAMA 1999; 281: 25560, doi:10.1001/jama.281.3.255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Rabinowitz, HK, Diamond, JJ, Markham, FW, et al. Critical factors for designing programs to increase the supply and retention of rural primary care physicians. JAMA 2001; 286: 1041–8, doi:10.1001/jama.286.9.1041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Sempowski, IP. Effectiveness of financial incentives in exchange for rural and underserviced area return-of-service commitments: systematic review of the literature. Can J Rural Med 2004; 9: 82–8.Google ScholarPubMed