Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:21:36.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Doit-on limiter les contacts entre les résidents et les représentants de compagnies pharmaceutiques?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Claude Topping
Claude Topping*
Affiliation:
Directeur du programme de formation complémentaire en médecine d’urgence, Université Laval, Québec (Qué.)
*
Directeur du programme de formation complémentaire en médecine d’urgence, Faculté de médecine, Université Laval, Québec QC G1K 7P4; [email protected]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Club de Lecture JCMU • CJEM Journal Club
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , July 2002 , pp. 281 - 282
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2002

References

1.Ziegler, MG, Lew, P, Singer, BC.The accuracy of drug information from pharmaceutical sales representatives. JAMA 1995; 273:1296–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Wazana, A.Physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: Is a gift ever just a gift? JAMA 2000;283:373–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Orlowski, JP, Wateska, L.The effects of pharmaceutical firm enticements on physician prescribing patterns. There’s no such thing as a free lunch. Chest 1992;102(1):270–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Chren, MM, Landefeld, CS.Physicians’ behavior and their interactions with drug companies. A controlled study of physicians who requested additions to a hospital drug formulary. JAMA 1994;271(9):684–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Steinman, MA, Shlipak, MG, McPhee, SJ.Of principles and pens: attitudes and practices of medecine housestaff toward pharmaceutical industry promotions. Am J Med 2001;110(7):551–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar