Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T06:37:12.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diagnosis of occult scaphoid fractures: a randomized, controlled trial comparing bone scans to radiographs for diagnosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2015

Christina Hiscox ,
Jeremy LaMothe ,
Neil White ,
Mark Bromley ,
Elizabeth Oddone Paolucci  and
Kevin Hildebrand
Christina Hiscox*
Affiliation:
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
Jeremy LaMothe
Affiliation:
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
Neil White
Affiliation:
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
Mark Bromley
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine
Elizabeth Oddone Paolucci
Affiliation:
Departments of Surgery and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
Kevin Hildebrand
Affiliation:
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
*
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Health Sciences Centre, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6; [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

Many patients with suspected scaphoid fractures but negative radiographs are immobilized for ≥ 2 weeks and are eventually found to have no fracture. Bone scans are reportedly 99% sensitive for these injuries if done ≥ 72 hours postinjury.

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to determine if early bone scans would allow for shorter cast immobilization periods in patients with suspected scaphoid fractures.

Methods:

Twenty-seven patients with clinically suspected scaphoid fractures and negative radiographs were randomized to early diagnosis (bone scan within 3–5 days; n 5 12) or traditional diagnosis (radiographs 10–14 days postinjury; n 5 15). The primary outcome was number of days immobilized in a cast.

Results:

The mean number of days immobilized was 26 in the traditional group and 29 in the bone scan group. Overall, 6 patients had scaphoid fractures (2 in the traditional diagnosis group and 4 in the bone scan group; p > 0.05), and 8 had other types of fractures. These other types of fractures included four distal radius fractures, two triquetral fractures, one trapezoid fracture, and one hamate fracture. There was no significant difference in the number of other types of fractures between groups. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis using the log-rank test revealed that there was no statistically significant difference between days immobilized between the radiograph and bone scan groups (p 5 0.38).

Conclusions:

The current study suggests that the use of bone scans to help diagnose occult scaphoid fractures does not reduce the number of days immobilized and that the differential diagnosis of occult scaphoid fractures should remain broad because other injuries are common.

Keywords

diagnosisfracturescaphoid
Type
Original Research • Recherche originale
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , July 2014 , pp. 296 - 303
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2014

References

REFERENCES

1. Kozin, SH. Incidence, mechanism, and natural history of scaphoid fractures. Hand Clin 2001;17:515–24.Google Scholar
2. Chakravarty, D, Sloan, J, Brenchley, J. Risk reduction through skeletal scintigraphy as a screening tool in suspectedscaphoid fracture: a literature review. Emerg Med J 2002;19:507–9, doi:10.1136/emj.19.6.507.Google Scholar
3. Leventhal, EL, Wolfe, SW, Moore, DC, et al. Interfragmentary motion in patients with scaphoid nonunion. J Hand Surg Am 2008;33:1108–15, doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.03.008.Google Scholar
4. Moritomo, H, Murase, T, Oka, K, et al. Relationship between the fracture location and the kinematic pattern in scaphoid nonunion. J Hand Surg Am 2008;33:1459–68, doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.05.035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Murphy, D, Eisenhauer, M. The utility of a bone scan in the diagnosis of clinical scaphoid fracture. J Emerg Med 1994;12:709–12, doi:10.1016/0736-4679(94)90432-4.Google Scholar
6. Murphy, DG, Eisenhauer, MA, Powe, J, et al. Can a day 4 bone scan accurately determine the presence or absence of scaphoid fracture? Ann Emerg Med 1995;26:434–8, doi:10.1016/S0196-0644(95)70110-9.Google Scholar
7. Mittal, RL, Dargan, SK. Occult scaphoid fracture: a diagnostic enigma. J Orthop Trauma 1989;3:306–8, doi:10.1097/00005131-198912000-00008.Google Scholar
8. Waeckerle, JF. A prospective study identifying the sensitivity of radiographic findings and the efficacy of clinical findings in carpal navicular fractures. Ann Emerg Med 1987;16:733–7, doi:10.1016/S0196-0644(87)80563-2.Google Scholar
9. Waizenegger, M, Wastie, ML, Barton, NJ, et al. Scintigraphy in the evaluation of the “clinical” scaphoid fracture. J Hand Surg Br 1994;19:750–3, doi:10.1016/0266-7681(94)90251-8.Google Scholar
10. Schubert, HE. Scaphoid fracture. Review of diagnostic tests and treatment. Can Fam Physician 2000;46:1825–32.Google ScholarPubMed
11. Roolker, W, Maas, M, Broekhuizen, AH. Diagnosis and treatment of scaphoid fractures, can non-union be prevented? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1999;119:428–31, doi:10.1007/s004020050014.Google Scholar
12. Rolfe, EB, Garvie, NW, Khan, MA, et al. Isotope bone imaging in suspected scaphoid trauma. Br J Radiol 1981;54:762–7, doi:10.1259/0007-1285-54-645-762.Google Scholar
13. Zarnett, R, Martin, C, Barrington, TW, et al. The natural history of suspected scaphoid fractures. Can J Surg 1991;34:334–7.Google Scholar
14. Leslie, IJ, Dickson, RA. The fractured carpal scaphoid. Natural history and factors influencing outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1981;63-B:225–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Duncan, DS, Thurston, AJ. Clinical fracture of the carpal scaphoid—an illusionary diagnosis. J Hand Surg Br 1985;10:375–6, doi:10.1016/S0266-7681(85)80065-6.Google Scholar
16. Tiel-van Buul, MM, Broekhuizen, TH, van Beek, EJ, et al. Choosing a strategy for the diagnostic management of suspected scaphoid fracture: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Nucl Med 1995;36:45–8.Google Scholar
17. Tiel-van Buul, MM, Roolker, W, Broekhuizen, AH, et al. The diagnostic management of suspected scaphoid fracture. Injury 1997;28:1–8, doi:10.1016/S0020-1383(96)00127-1.Google Scholar
18. Beeres, FJP, Hogervorst, M, Rhemrev, SJ, et al. A prospective comparison for suspected scaphoid fractures: bone scintigraphy versus clinical outcome. Injury 2007;38:769–74, doi:10.1016/j.injury.2006.12.009.Google Scholar
19. Gäbler, C, Kukla, C, Breitenseher, MJ, et al. Diagnosis of occult scaphoid fractures and other wrist injuries. Are repeated clinical examinations and plain radiographs still state of the art? Langenbecks Arch Surg 2001;386:150–4, doi:10.1007/s004230000195.Google Scholar
20. Fowler, C, Sullivan, B, Williams, LA, et al. A comparison of bone scintigraphy and MRI in the early diagnosis of the occult scaphoid waist fracture. Skeletal Radiol 1998;27:683–7, doi:10.1007/s002560050459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Beeres, FJP, Hogervorst, M, den Hollander, P, et al. Outcome of routine bone scintigraphy in suspected scaphoid fractures. Injury 2005;36:1233–6, doi:10.1016/j.injury.2005.02.009.Google Scholar
22. Memarsadeghi, M, Breitenseher, MJ, Schaefer-Prokop, C, et al. Occult scaphoid fractures: comparison of multidetector CT and MR imaging—initial experience. Radiology 2006;240:169–76, doi:10.1148/radiol.2401050412.Google Scholar