Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:46:03.301Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Critically Appraised Topics: Is the esophageal detector device or end-tidal CO2 measurement superior in confirming endotracheal tube placement?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

David J. Rhine  and
David J. Morrow
David J. Rhine*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
David J. Morrow
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
*
[email protected]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
CJEM Journal Club • Club de lecture du JCMU
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , July 1999 , pp. 103 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 1999

References

1.Macleod, BA, Heller, MB, Gerard, J, Yealy, DM, Menegazzi, JJ.Verification of ETT placement with colorimetric ETCO2 detection. Ann Emerg Med 1991;20(3):267.Google Scholar
2.Ardagh, M, Moodie, K.The esophageal detector device can give false positives for tracheal intubation. J Emerg Med 1998;16 (5):747–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Wee, M.The esophageal detector device. Anesthesia 1988;43:27–9.Google Scholar
4.Wee, M.The esophageal detector device: an assessment with uncuffed tubes in children. Anesthesia 1991;46:869–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed