Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:39:56.736Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Core competencies for emergency medicine clerkships: results of a Canadian consensus initiative

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2015

Rick Penciner ,
Robert A. Woods ,
Jill McEwen ,
Richard Lee ,
Trevor Langhan ,
Trevor Langhan  and
Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians Undergraduate Education Committee
Rick Penciner*
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
Robert A. Woods
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK
Jill McEwen
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC
Richard Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
Trevor Langhan
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
Trevor Langhan
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
*
North York General Hospital, 4001 Leslie Street, 630N, Toronto, ON M2K 1E1; [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objectives:

There is no consensus on what constitutes the core competencies for emergency medicine (EM) clerkship rotations in Canada. Existing EM curricula have been developed through informal consensus and often focus on EM content to be known at the end of training rather than what is an appropriate focus for a time-limited rotation in EM. We sought to define the core competencies for EM clerkship in Canada through consensus among an expert panel of Canadian EM educators.

Methods:

We used a modified Delphi method and the CanMEDS 2005 Physician Competency Framework to develop a consensus among expert EM educators from across Canada.

Results:

Thirty experts from nine different medical schools across Canada participated on the panel. The initial list consisted of 152 competencies organized in the seven domains of the CanMEDS 2005 Physician Competency Framework. After the second round of the Delphi process, the list of competencies was reduced to 62 (59% reduction). A complete list of competencies is provided.

Conclusion:

This study established a national consensus defining the core competencies for EM clerkship in Canada.

Keywords

competenciesDelphieducationemergency medicineundergraduate
Type
Original Research • Recherche originale
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , January 2013 , pp. 24 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2013

References

REFERENCES

1.Frank, JR, Penciner, R, Upadhye, S, et al. State of the nation: a profile of Canadian emergency medicine clerkships 2007. CJEM 2008; 10: 266.Google Scholar
2.Manthey, DE, Coates, WC, Ander, DS, et al. Report of the task force on national fourth year medical student emergency medicine curriculum guide. Ann Emerg Med 2006; 47: E1-7, doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.09.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Hobgood, C, Anantharaman, V, Bandiera, G, et al. International Federation for Emergency Medicine model curriculum for medical student education in emergency medicine. CJEM 2009; 11: 349–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Burke, MJ, Brodkey, AC. Trends in undergraduate medical education clinical clerkship learning objectives. Acad Psychiatry 2006; 30: 158–65, doi:10.1176/appi.ap.30.2.158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Liaison Committee onMedical Education. LCME accreditation standards - educational program for the MD degree: educational objectives. Available at: http://www.lcme.org/functionslist.htm#educational program (accessed August 9, 2010).Google Scholar
6.Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Outcome Project 2010. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/outcome (accessed August 16, 2010).Google Scholar
7.Frank, JR, editor. The CanMEDS 2005 physician competency framework: better physicians, better care. Ottawa: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2005. Available at: (accessed August 9, 2010).Google Scholar
8.Association of American Medical Colleges. Recommendations for clinical skills curricula for undergraduate medical education 2005. Available at: https://services.aamc.org/Publications/showFile.cfm?file=version56.pdf&prd_id=141&prv_id=165&pdf_id=56 (accessed August 9, 2010).Google Scholar
9.Harris, P, Snell, L, Talbot, M, Harden, RM. Competencybased medical education: implications for undergraduate programs. Med Teach 2010; 32: 646–50, doi:10.3109/0142159X.2010.500703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Hasson, F, Keeney, S, McKenna, H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs 2000; 32: 1008–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Penciner, R, Langhan, T, Lee, R, et al. Using a Delphi process to establish consensus on emergency medicine clerkship competencies. Med Teach 2011; 33: e333-9, doi:10.3109/0142159X.2011.575903.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Valente, TW, Pumpuang, P. Identifying opinion leaders to promote behaviour change. Health Educ Behav 2007; 34: 881–96, doi:10.1177/1090198106297855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Barton, AJ, Armstrong, G, Preheim, G, et al. A national Delphi to determine developmental progression of quality and safety competencies in nursing education. Nurs Outlook 2009; 57: 313–22, doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2009.08.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Fried, H, Leao, AT. Using Delphi technique in a consensual curriculum for peridontics. J Dent Educ 2007; 71: 1441–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Walley, T, Webb, DJ. Developing a core curriculum in clinical pharmacology and therapeutics: a Delphi study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1997; 44: 167–70, doi:10.1046/j.1365-2125.1997.00669.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Esmaily, HM, Savage, C, Vahidi, R, et al. Identifying outcome-based indicators and developing a curriculum for a continuing medical education programme on rational prescribing using a modified Delphi process. BMC Med Educ 2008; 8: 33, doi:10.1186/1472-6920-8-33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Flynn, L, Verma, S. Fundamental components of a curriculum for residents in health advocacy. Med Teach 2008; 30: e178-83, doi:10.1080/01421590802139757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Paes, P, Wee, B. A Delphi study to develop the Association for Palliative Medicine consensus syllabus for undergraduate palliative medicine in Great Britain and Ireland. Palliat Med 2008; 22: 360–4, doi:10.1177/0269216308090769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Clayton, R, Perera, R, Burge, S. Defining the dermatological content of the undergraduate medical curriculum: a modified Delphi study. Br J Dermatol 2006; 155: 137–44, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07190.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Perkins, GD, Barrett, H, Bullock, I, et al. The Acute Care Undergraduate Teaching (ACUTE) Initiative: consensus development of core competencies in acute care for undergraduates in the United Kingdom. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 1627–33, doi:10.1007/s00134-005-2837-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Hueston, WJ, Koopman, RJ, Chessman, AW. A suggested fourth-year curriculum for medical students planning on entering family medicine. Fam Med 2004; 36: 118–22.Google ScholarPubMed
22.Jones, J, Hunter, D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. Br Med J 1995; 311: 376–80, doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7001.376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Laidlaw, A, Hart, J. Communication skills: an essential component of medical curricula. Part I: Assessment of clinical communication: AMEE Guide No 51. Med Teach 2011; 33: 6–8, doi:10.3109/0142159X.2011.531170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.O’Sullivan, H, van Mook, W, Fewtrell, R, et al. Integrating professionalism into the curriculum. Med Teach 2012; 34: 155–7, doi:10.3109/0142159X.2011.595600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed