BACKGROUND

Skin and soft tissue infections comprise a significant number of health care visits, resulting in 3.4 million emergency department (ED) visits and 6.3 million primary care visits annually.Reference Pallin, Egan and Pelletier ^{1 ,} Reference Pallin, Espinola and Leung ² Over the past several years, community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) has emerged as the most common cause of purulent skin and soft tissue infections.Reference Moran, Krishnadasan and Gorwitz ^{3 ,} Reference Talan, Krishnadasan and Gorwitz ⁴ Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), which has retained very low resistance rates for CA-MRSA treatment, has become one of the most commonly prescribed antibiotics to treat these infections.Reference Moran, Krishnadasan and Gorwitz ^{3 ,} Reference Talan, Krishnadasan and Gorwitz ⁴

The primary treatment of cutaneous abscesses is incision and drainage.Reference Singer and Talan ⁵ However, whether adjunctive antibiotics will significantly improve outcomes has been unclear. Prior studies demonstrated no significant difference in cure rates between antibiotic and placebo groups, but were limited by small sample sizes and use of antibiotics ineffective against CA-MRSA.Reference Singer and Thode ⁶ Because drainage alone will result in cure rates in excess of 85%, very large sample sizes are required to demonstrate a significant difference.Reference Singer and Thode ⁶

POPULATION STUDIED

The study enrolled patients older than 12 years of age who presented to the ED with a cutaneous lesion suspected to be an abscess by physical examination and ultrasonography or examination alone and found to have purulent material on surgical exploration. Patients were included if the lesion had been present for less than 1 week, the lesion was at least 2.0 cm in diameter by examination or ultrasonography, and the treating clinician intended outpatient treatment. Exclusion criteria included presence of an indwelling device, presence of an organic foreign body, associated mammalian bite, underlying skin condition, immunodeficiency, renal dysfunction, endocarditis risk factors, allergic reaction or intolerance to TMP-SMX, current antibiotic use, pregnancy or lactation, enrollment within the prior 12 weeks, or perirectal, perineal, or paronychial location.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a multicentre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial that enrolled patients presenting to five different U.S. EDs with abscesses treated with incision and drainage. All patients received standardized training on abscess drainage techniques prior to the study. Patients were allocated to twice daily TMP-SMX (320 mg of trimethoprim and 1600 mg of sulfamethoxazole) or placebo in a 1:1 ratio by a remote, Web-based randomization system featuring randomly permuted blocks. Each study participant received 56 identical-appearing capsules and was instructed to take four pills twice daily for 7 days.

OUTCOMES MEASURED

The primary outcome measured in this study was the rate of clinical cure, defined as not meeting any of the criteria for treatment failure (Table 1), at 7 to 14 days after the end of the treatment period (14 to 21 days after ED presentation). Secondary outcomes included composite cure (resolution of all symptoms and signs of infection or improvement such that no additional antibiotics or procedures were necessary); surgical drainage procedures; change in erythema size; presence of swelling, induration, or tenderness; invasive infections; skin infections at the same site and different sites; hospitalizations; similar infections in household contacts; days missed from normal activities; days missed from school or work; and days of analgesic use.

Table 1 Criteria for treatment failure

STUDY CONCLUSION

In settings in which MRSA was prevalent, TMP-SMX treatment resulted in a higher cure rate among patients with drained cutaneous abscesses than placebo.

COMMENTARY

Most abscesses are successfully treated with incision and drainage.Reference Singer and Talan ^{5 ,} Reference Singer and Thode ⁶ Multiple studies have evaluated the utility of adjunctive antibiotics in the management of abscesses in conjunction with surgical drainage.Reference Singer and Thode ⁶ However, only two randomized, controlled trials, comprising 161 and 212 patients, have assessed TMP-SMX in the era after the emergence of CA-MRSA.Reference Duong, Markwell and Peter ^{7 ,} Reference Schmitz, Bruner and Pitotti ⁸ Unfortunately, given the the high baseline cure rates with incision and drainage alone, these studies were underpowered to detect a clinical difference, prompting the current study.

This study demonstrated an approximate 7% increase in cure rates with the use of adjunctive TMP-SMX. Among this group, there was a 5.2% increase in the total number of patients requiring additional incision and drainage, which may be an important patient outcome. It is important to weigh this potential benefit against risks associated with increased TMP-SMX use. While this study demonstrated no significant difference in adverse drug events, with the exception of slightly increased gastrointestinal symptoms, it was underpowered to identify serious, life-threatening infections, such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome.Reference Chan, Stern and Arndt ⁹ Additionally, less than 65% of patients were 100% compliant with the medication and, although this may reflect real-life practice, it may also have under-represented other known side effects of TMP-SMX, such as renal dysfunction, electrolyte abnormalities, and Clostridium difficile colitis. The authors also did not address the potential for antibiotic resistance with increased use, which can have significant public health consequences. Furthermore, it is important to note that the average abscess was 2 to 3 cm, but the majority had an associated cellulitis measuring more than 5 cm. This suggests that many cases may have been a combination of abscess with cellulitis (which many would already treat with adjunctive antibiotics), rather than simple uncomplicated abscesses. Because experts currently recommend adjunctive antibiotics for patients at the extremes of age and those with diabetes, systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria, or with erythema extending beyond 5 cm, this study provides further support for the treatment of these patients.Reference Liu, Bayer and Cosgrove ^{10 ,} Reference Stevens, Bisno and Chambers ¹¹ Finally, MRSA rates may vary by location. Although this study demonstrated a 45.3% overall prevalence of MRSA, two other Canadian studies have demonstrated variations in the rates of MRSA. One study performed in Toronto, Canada demonstrated a 19% prevalence of MRSA among skin and soft tissue infections,Reference Adam, Allen and Currie ¹² whereas another study in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada demonstrated a prevalence of 54.8% with a threefold increase over the preceding 2-year period.Reference Stenstrom, Grafstein and Romney ¹³ Therefore, it is important to consider the prevalence of MRSA at one’s own institution when applying this study and selecting antibiotics.