Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:52:55.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparative study of designated trauma team leaders on trauma patient survival and emergency department length-of-stay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Garnet E. Cummings  and
Damon C. Mayes
Garnet E. Cummings*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine and the Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
Damon C. Mayes
Affiliation:
Empirika Consulting Corporation, Edmonton, Alta.
*
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Royal Alexandra Hospital, 10240 Kingsway Ave., Edmonton AB T5H 3V9, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objectives:

There is controversy over who should serve as the Trauma Team Leader (TTL) at trauma-receiving centres. This study compared survival and emergency department (ED) length-of-stay between patients cared for by 3 different groups of TTLs: surgeons, emergency physicians (EPs) on call for trauma cases and EPs on shift in the ED.

Methods:

We performed a retrospective cohort study involving all adult major blunt trauma patients (aged 17 and older) who were admitted to 2 level I trauma centres and who were entered into a provincial Trauma Registry between March 2000 and April 2002. The study was designed to compare the effect of TTL-type on survival and ED length-of-stay, while controlling for sex, age, and trauma severity as defined by the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and the Revised Trauma Score (RTS). Analysis was performed using linear regression modeling (for the ED lenght-of-stay outcome variable), and logistic regression modeling (for the surivial outcome variable).

Results:

There were 1412 patients enrolled in the study. The study population comprised 74% men and 26% women, with a mean age of 44.7 years (43.1, 46.6 and 42.8 years for surgeons, on-call EPs and on-shift EPs, respectively). The overall mean ISS was 23.2 (23.7 for surgeons, 22.9 for on-call EPs and 23.3 for on-shift EPs) and the overall average RTS was 7.6 (7.6 for surgeons, 7.6 for on-call EPs and 7.5 for on-shift EPs). The overall median ED length-of-stay was 5.3 hours (4.5, 5.3 and 5.6 hours for surgeons, on-call EPs and on-shift EPs, respectively; p = 0.07) and the overall survival was 87% (86% surgeon, 88% on-call EP, 87% on-shift EP; p = 0.08). No statistically significant relationship was found between TTL-type and ED length-of-stay (p = 0.42) or survival (p = 0.43) using multivariate modeling.

Conclusion:

Our results suggest that surgeons, on-call EPs, or on-shift EPs can act as the TTL without a negative impact on patient survival or ED length-of-stay.

Keywords

trauma team leaderED length-of-staysurvivalblunt trauma
Type
Original Research • Recherche originale
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , March 2007 , pp. 105 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2007

References

1.Adedeji, O, Driscoll, P. The trauma team: a system of initial trauma care. Postgrad Med J 1996;72:587–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Petrie, D, Lane, P, Stewart, T. An evaluation of patient outcomes comparing trauma team activated versus trauma team not activated using TRISS analysis. Trauma and Injury Severity Score. J Trauma 1996;41:870–3.Google Scholar
3.Driscoll, P, Vincent, C. Variation in trauma resuscitation and its effect on patient outcome. Injury 1992;23:111–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Driscoll, P, Vincent, C. Organizing an efficient trauma team. Injury. 1992;23:107–10.Google Scholar
5.Bain, I, Kirby, R, Cook, A, et al. Role of the general surgeon in a British trauma centre. Br J Surg 1996;83:1248–51.Google Scholar
6.Lavoie, A, Tsakonas, E, Samplis, J, et al. Medical specialties assuming the role of trauma team leader in Canadian trauma centers. European Journal of Trauma 2003;29 Available: www.europeantrauma.net/journal/regular_contents/detail/154 (accessed 2006 May 4).Google Scholar
7.Ochsner, MG, Schmidt, J, Rozycki, G, et al. The evaluation of a two-tier trauma response system at a major trauma center: is it cost effective and safe. J Trauma 1995;39:971–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Boyd, R, Tolson, M, Copes, W. Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method. J Trauma 1987;27:370–8.Google Scholar
9.Report to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma from its Committee on Issues. J Trauma 1981;21:904–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Trauma care. Ann Emerg Med 1982;11:105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Kortbeek, J. A review of trauma systems using the Calgary model. Can J Surg. 2000;43:23–8.Google Scholar
12.Skinner, D, Driscoll, P, Earlam, R. ABC of Major Trauma. 2nd ed. London (UK): BMJ Publishing Group; 1996:83.Google Scholar
13.Champion, HR, Sacco, WJ, Gann, DS, et al. A revision of the Trauma Score. J Trauma 1989;29:623–9.Google Scholar
14.Champion, H, Copes, W, Sacco, W. The major trauma outcomes study: establishing standards for trauma care. J Trauma 1990;30:1356–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Trauma Care. Available: www.naph.org/Content/Content-Groups/Advocacy_Issues/Glossary1/Trauma_Care.htm (accessed 2006 June 1).Google Scholar
16.Champion, H, Sacco, W. The trauma score. Crit Care Med 1981;9:672–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Trauma Association of Canada—Trauma Centre Accreditation Committee. Available: www.traumacanada.org/pdf/Accreditation.htm (accessed 2006 June 1).Google Scholar
18.Porter, J, Ursic, C. Trauma attending in the resuscitation room: does it affect outcome? Am Surg 2001;67:611–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Morabito, D, Proctor, M, May, C. Overview of trauma registries. J AHIMA 1992;63(2):39–44, 46, 48.Google Scholar
20.Cayten, CG, Stahl, WM, Murphy, JG, et al. Limitations of the TRISS method for interhospital comparisons: a multihospital study. J Trauma 1991;31:471–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Hughes, RG, Garnick, DW, Luft, HS. Hospital volume and patient outcomes: the case of hip fracture patients. Med Care 1988;26:1057–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Copes, W. Letter to participating trauma centers re: Major Trauma Outcomes Study [personal communication]. 1985.Google Scholar