Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:41:53.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Close only counts in horseshoes and … triage?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Eric Grafstein
Eric Grafstein*
Affiliation:
Informatics, Department of Emergency Medicine, Providence Health Care, and St. Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, BC
*
[email protected]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentary • Commentaire
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , July 2004 , pp. 288 - 289
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2004

References

1.Worster, A, Gilboy, N, Fernandes, CM, Eitel, D, Eva, K, Geisler, R, Tanabe, P.Assessment of inter-observer reliability of two five-level triage and acuity scales: a randomized controlled trial. Can J Emerg Med 2004;6(4):240–5.Google Scholar
2.Byrt, T, Bishop, J, Carlin, JB.Bias, prevalence and kappa. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46(5):423–9.Google Scholar
3.International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th rev. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1992.Google Scholar
4.Grafstein, E, Innes, G, Westman, J, Christenson, J, Thorne, A.Inter-rater reliability of a computerized presenting-complaint–linked triage system in an urban emergency department. Can J Emerg Med 2003;5(5):323–9.Google Scholar
5.Beveridge, R, Ducharme, J, Janes, L, Beaulieu, S, Walter, S.Reliability of the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale: interrater agreement. Ann Emerg Med 1999;34:155–9.Google Scholar
6.Grafstein, E, Unger, B, Bullard, M, Innes G; for the Canadian Emergency Department Information System (CEDIS) Working Group. Canadian Emergency Department Information System (CEDIS) Presenting Complaint List (Version 1.0). Can J Emerg Med 2003;5(1):27–34.Google Scholar
7.Jiménez, JG, Murray, MJ, Beveridge, R, Pons, JP, Cortés, EA, Ferrando Garrigós, JB, et al. Implementation of the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in the Principality of Andorra: Can triage parameters serve as emergency department quality indicators? Can J Emerg Med 2003;5(5):315–22.Google Scholar
8.Yoon, P, Steiner, I, Reinhardt, G.Analysis of factors influencing length of stay in the emergency department. Can J Emerg Med 2003;5(3):155–61.Google Scholar
9.Stenstrom, R, Grafstein, E, Innes, G, Christenson, J.Real-time predictive validity of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) [abstract]. Acad Emerg Med 2003;5:512.Google Scholar
10.Murray, MJ, Levis, G.Does triage level (Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale) correlate with resource utilization for emergency department visits? [abstract]. Can J Emerg Med 2004;6(3):180.Google Scholar