Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:25:07.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Canadian Emergency Department Information System (CEDIS) Presenting Complaint List (Version 1.0)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Eric Grafstein*
Affiliation:
St. Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
Bernard Unger
Affiliation:
Sir Mortimer B. Davis–Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Que
Michael Bullard
Affiliation:
The University of Alberta Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
Grant Innes
Affiliation:
St. Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
the Canadian Emergency Department Information System (CEDIS) Working Group
Affiliation:
For a list of CEDIS Working Group members, please see end of article
*
Department of Emergency Medicine, St. Paul’s Hospital, 1081 Burrard St., Vancouver BC V6Z 1Y6; 604 806-8982, fax 801 806-8488, [email protected]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
ED Administration • L’Administration De La MU
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2003

References

1.Weiss, HB, Dill, SM, Forjuoh, SN, Garrison, HG, Cohen, JH.Injury surveillance: a statewide survey of emergency department data collection practices. Ann Emerg Med 1996;28:63540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Innes, G, Murray, M, Grafstein, E, for the Canadian Emergency Department Information System (CEDIS) Working Group. A consensus-based process to define standard national data elements for a Canadian emergency department information system. CJEM 2001;3(4):27784.Google Scholar
3.Cordell, W, Overhage, JM, Waekerle, JF. Strategies for improving information management in emergency medicine to meet clinical, research, and administrative needs. Ann Emerg Med 1998;31:1728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Beveridge, R, Clarke, B, Janes, L, Savage, N, Thompson, J, Dodd, G, et al. Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale: implementation guidelines. CJEM 1999;1(3 suppl).Google Scholar
5.Beveridge, R.CAEP issues. The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale: a new and critical element in health care reform. Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians. J Emerg Med 1998; 16(3):50711.Google Scholar
6.Emergency Triage. Manchester Triage Group. Mackway-Jones, K, editor. London: BMJ Publishing Group. 1996.Google Scholar
7.Pollock, DA, Adams, DL, Bernardo, LM, Bradley, V, Brandt, MD, Davis, TE, et al. Data elements for emergency department systems, release 1.0 (DEEDS): a summary report. DEEDS Writing Committee. Ann Emerg Med 1998;31(2):26473.Google Scholar
8.International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th rev. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1992 (vol 1: tabular list, vol 2: instruction manual, vol 3: alphabetical index).Google Scholar
9.Teich, JM.Information systems support for emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med 1998;31:3048.Google Scholar
10.Canadian Institute for Health Information. National Ambulatory Care Reporting System (NACRS) Implementation. Available: http://secure.cihi.ca/cihiweb/en/downloads/services_nacrs_e_elements.pdf (accessed 2002 Nov 1).Google Scholar
11.Victorian Emergency Minimum Dataset (VEMD) User Manual, Version 6.0, 2001/2002. Victoria (Australia): Acute Health Division, Department of Human Services; July 2001. Available: http://hdds.health.vic.gov.au/vemd/index.htm (accessed 2002 Nov 26).Google Scholar
12.Aronsky, D, Kendall, D, Merkley, K, James, BC, Haug, PJ.A comprehensive set of coded chief complaints for the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2001;8(10):9809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Cleary, MI, Ashby, RH, Jelinek, GA, Lagaida, R.The future of casemix in emergency medicine and ambulatory care. Med J Aust 1994;161 (suppl):S303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar