No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Bien écrire pour bien se faire comprendre: mise à jour des instructions aux auteurs
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 May 2015
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
- Type
- Editorial • Éditorial
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2007
References
Références
1.International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication. Disponible sur : http://www.icmje.org/ (Consulté le 17 octobre 2007).Google Scholar
2.Altman, DG. Poor-quality medical research: What can journals do? JAMA 2002;287:2765–7.Google Scholar
3.Altman DG for the CONSORT Group. Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact medical journals: survey of instructions for authors. BMJ 2005;330:1056–7.Google Scholar
4.Gilbert, EH, Lowenstein, SR, Koziol-McLain, J, et al. Chart reviews in emergency medicine research: Where are the methods? Ann Emerg Med 1996;27:305–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Worster, A, Bledsoe, RD, Cleve, P, et al. Reassessing the methods of medical record review studies in emergency medicine research. Ann Emerg Med 2005;45:448–51.Google Scholar
6.Gustavii, B. How to write and illustrate a scientific paper. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Sheen, AP. Breathing life into medical writing: a handbook. St. Louis (MO): Mosby; 1982.Google Scholar
8.Browner, WS. Publishing and presenting clinical research. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.Google Scholar
9.Huth, EJ. Writing and publishing in medicine. 3rd ed. Baltimore (MD): Williams & Wilkins, 1999.Google Scholar
You have
Access