Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T00:23:51.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

[The authors respond]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Peter J. Zed ,
Riyad B. Abu-Laban  and
David W. Harrison
Peter J. Zed
Affiliation:
Capital Health and Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
Riyad B. Abu-Laban
Affiliation:
Vancouver General Hospital and University of British ColumbiaVancouver, BC
David W. Harrison
Affiliation:
Vancouver General Hospital and University of British ColumbiaVancouver, BC

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters • Correspondance
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , May 2008 , pp. 196 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2008

References

1.Zed, PJ, Abu-Laban, RB, Chan, WWY, et al. Efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction of propofol for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department: a prospective study. CJEM 2007;9:421–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Miner, JR, Krauss, B. Procedural sedation and analgesia research: state of the art. Acad Emerg Med 2007;14:170–8.Google Scholar
3.Miner, JR, Stephens, D, Plummer, D, et al. Randomized clinical trial of procedural sedation using propofol with and without the ultra-short acting narcotic alfentanil [abstract]. Acad Emerg Med 2007;14:S58.Google Scholar