Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-02T18:14:21.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Resourcefulness and Responsibility*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2014

Anthony Scott*
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
Get access

Extract

The subject of this paper is the economic analysis of the alienation of natural resources, by which is meant not only the disposal of a resource by outright sale but also the disposal of rights, perhaps for a limited period, to exploit, perhaps in a limited fashion, one or more of the natural resources of a specified area. In order to illustrate current procedures and their trends, I begin by describing very briefly the methods by which enterprises obtain rights from the province of British Columbia to exploit resources. (Readers interested only in analysis may wish to skip this first section.) In the next sections I discuss the contribution economic theory can make to an appraisal of methods of alienation; then, in the light of this discussion, I suggest a few desiderata in policy.

Since provinces are fairly free to make their own policies on alienation, procedures differ from region to region. Before the procedures followed in British Columbia are outlined, it should be emphasized that the more complete and absolute alienation to private ownership, the more the rights of the province shrink to the regulation of industry, collection of taxes, and other general powers enumerated in the British North America Act. It should also be kept in mind that the administration of natural gas and petroleum carried across provincial boundaries, of fisheries, and of rivers that cross the international boundary may be affected by both federal and American regulations and laws.

Agricultural land. Some land is alienated by pre-emption but in most cases it is sold on a first-come-first-served basis after survey and some development work by the government. On alienation, the land generally passes into private ownership, though mineral and water rights are reserved.

Fisheries. Anyone may fish, on conditions imposed mainly by the federal government.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper was delivered at the annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association in Ottawa, June 15, 1957. It was subsequently revised, before the publication of the second Sloan report, The Forest Resources of British Columbia, 1956 (Victoria: Queen“s Printer, Sept., 1957), or the almost simultaneous publication of Forestry Tenures and Taxes in Canada, by Milton Moore (Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation, 1957). Neither of these documents, however, seems to suggest that further revision is necessary. The paper has benefited from the helpful suggestions and comments of Professors J. J. Deutsch and Stuart Jamieson, and of Mr. D. M. M. Goldie, but the responsibility for statements of fact and opinion is my own.

References

1 Some of the interest in land economics, however, influenced international trade theory, and in Ohlin, Bertil, Interregional and International Trade (Cambridge, Mass., 1933)Google Scholar in particular, we have a balanced and detailed account of the effect of an area’s stock of natural resources on the distribution of its trade, its production, and its income.

2 This possible disadvantage has much to do with the fact that rent is a surprisingly small component of the national income. Not only is much “rent” actually shown as direct taxation (property and corporation taxes), but much of the residue is not taxed by the provincial government, and is allowed to become higher profits, wages, interest, or lower prices.

3 The present tax rental agreements make some concession to the solution of this problem, though Moore, Milton in his Forestry Tenures and Taxes in Canada, 211–14Google Scholar, would disagree on this point.

4 See, however, the remarks on this subject in the second Sloan report. In his original report in 1945, Chief Justice Sloan recommended perpetual tenure in forest management licences. The second report recommends reducing tenure to twenty-one years.

5 In the phrase “balanced development” I also include policies aimed at what we may call sociological, as distinct from economic, objectives. The parcelling out of agricultural land in small holdings, with concomitant support of family farms, is one of these. So also is the lack of interest in the rationalizing of the fisheries, the continuation of policies that favour small prospectors and small loggers, the unconditional allocation of many resources to Indians, and the preservation of the rights of hunters and sport fishermen.

6 The Wenner-Gren enterprise has, so far, done no more than indicate an interest in the trench and obtain rights as sole concessionaire in prospecting, surveying, timber-cruising, and so forth. It is forming a sort of planning-council which, I gather, co-ordinates the activities of the exploring parties and evaluates the prospects reported by each; the ultimate aim is the compiling of a report that will indicate which of the reported opportunities is worth exploiting, and which of the conflicting and complementary opportunities should also be developed in order to make the best use of the whole region. If the development is to proceed, enough activity must be initiated to cover the costs of a transportation system, in this case the famous mono-rail railway. The social requirements in the form of townsites, schools, roads, and hospitals would also be joint costs of all the industries established.

7 Even in this instance, where tenure is in effect offered as the incentive for prospecting, some use of the price mechanism would seem to be possible. For example, the original prospector or company could be given a lease, as now, and the unalienated adjoining land could become Crown reserve, to be auctioned or sold by tender, perhaps to the original company. Such a system would discourage much uninformed speculation in the stock market, prevent impecunious firms from retaining promising sites at no cost to themselves, and permit active firms to acquire the size of site they need, at the market price. The system would be unpopular with the little man in the mining industry, who cherishes his right to stake claims in any new, promising camp or region, because, like the system in use in petroleum and natural gas fields it would tend to favour the large, well-capitalized enterprise.