¹ “Privy Council, Cabinet, and Ministry in Britain and Canada,” this Journal (05, 1965), 193–205, esp. 202 and 205.Google Scholar

² Ibid., 200–1.

³ Ibid., 198.

⁴ Owen, John B., The Rise of the Pelhams (London, 1957), 48–50.Google Scholar

⁵ Costin, W. C. and Watson, J. S., The Law and Working of the Constitution (London, 1952), vol. II, 374 and 383.Google Scholar

⁶ Kitson Clark, G., “Statesmen in Disguise,” Historical Journal, II, no. 1, esp. 27–8 and 34.Google Scholar

⁷ Mill, J. S., Considerations on Representative Government, ed. McCallum, R. B. (Oxford, 1947), 264.Google Scholar “To maintain responsibility at its highest there must be one person who receives the whole praise of what is well done, the whole blame of what is ill.”

⁸ Foord, Archibald S., His Majesty's Opposition (Oxford, 1964), 40.Google Scholar

⁹ Aspinall, A., “The Cabinet Council, 1783–1835,” Proceedings of the British Academy, XXXVIII, 145-6.Google Scholar

¹⁰ By now, a Canadian historian may also decline to see any difference. In a single paragraph “government,” “administration,” “Cabinet,” and “ministry” are used as synonyms for the Council. Creighton, Donald, John A. Macdonald: The Young Politician (Toronto, 1952), 121.Google Scholar

¹¹ Muir, Ramsay, How Britain is Governed (Boston and New York, 1935), 81.Google Scholar

¹² Financing Higher Education in Canada (Toronto and Quebec, 1965), 67.Google Scholar

¹³ Globe and Mail, Oct. 7, 1965. In “Highlights” the newspaper refers to the “appointment of federal minister of higher education”, and in “A University Prospectus” it says the Report “recommended that the federal Government create a Ministry of Education.”