Article contents
The Movement towards Labour Unity in Canada: History and Implications*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 November 2014
Extract
One of the marching songs of the labour movement on this continent is “Solidarity Forever!” But in Canada, its exhortation has sometimes been more honoured in the breach than in the observance. At intervals over the last half-century and more, Canadian trade unionism has been “by schisms rent asunder, by heresies distrest.” In 1902, the Trades and Labor Congress of Canada (T.L.C.) threw out the Knights of Labor and national unions which were “dual” to international unions affiliated with the American Federation of Labor (A.F.L.). The twenty-three expelled organizations promptly formed the National Trades and Labour Congress. In 1908, this became the Canadian Federation of Labour, a name which has kept cropping up in Canadian labour history ever since. In 1919, just after the Winnipeg strike, and partly as a result of it, a considerable number of western unionists left the T.L.C. to form the One Big Union (O.B.U.). Between 1901 and 1921, small local Roman Catholic unions sprang up in the province of Quebec, and in 1921 these formed the Canadian and Catholic Confederation of Labour (C.C.C.L.). In 1927, the Canadian Federation of Labour and other national unions formed the All-Canadian Congress of Labour (A.C.C.L.). In 1936, some of the officers of the A.C.C.L. seceded to form the present Canadian Federation of Labour, which is no longer even mentioned in the Department of Labour's annual Report on Labour Organization in Canada (and has not been since the 1950–1 edition), and which the orthodox union movement never considered a genuine labour organization at all. (About ten years ago, a secession from the Canadian Federation of Labour formed the National Council of Canadian Labour, which —in spite of its grandiose title, and the faint air of respectability imparted to it by inclusion in the Department of Labour's report, which gives it 42 locals and 5,640 members—is also beyond the pale of orthodox unionism.) In 1939, the executive of the T.L.C. suspended the Canadian unions affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations (C.I.O.) in the United States. These unions formed a Canadian C.I.O. Committee.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science/Revue canadienne de economiques et science politique , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , February 1958 , pp. 70 - 83
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 1958
Footnotes
This paper was presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association in Ottawa, June 13, 1957.
References
1 Canada, Dept. of Labour, Report on Labour Organization in Canada, various years, passim.
2 Ibid.
3 C.C.L. Convention Proceedings (1940), 13, 22.Google Scholar
4 Report on Labour Organization in Canada (1940), 20–5, 27–9.Google Scholar
5 C.C.L. Convention Proceedings (1940), 28–9 (1942), 22–3, 48.Google Scholar
6 T.L.C. Convention Proceedings (1942), 240.Google Scholar
7 C.C.L. Convention Proceedings (1943), 42.Google Scholar
8 Labour Gazette (1943), 1437.Google Scholar
9 C.C.L. Convention Proceedings (1944), 63.Google Scholar
10 J.L.C. Convention Proceedings (1944), 164–7.Google Scholar
11 C.C.I,. Convention Proceedings (1946), 101.Google Scholar
12 Labour Gazette (1946), 1382.Google Scholar
13 Ibid., 1389.
14 Ibid. (1947), 1584.
15 T.L.C. Convention Proceedings (1947, French version), 242.Google Scholar
16 Labour Gazette (1948), 695–6.Google Scholar
17 Ibid., 1362.
18 T.L.C. Convention Proceedings (1948), 341–2.Google Scholar
19 C.C.L. Convention Proceedings (1949), 71–2.Google Scholar
20 T.L.C. Convention Proceedings (1949), 393.Google Scholar
21 Labour Gazette (1949), 247.Google Scholar
22 Trudeau, Pierre Elliott et al., La Grève de l'amiante (Montréal, 1956), 349–50.Google Scholar
23 Labour Gazette (1950), 1625.Google Scholar
24 C.C.L. Convention Proceedings (1950), 35.Google Scholar
25 Labour Gazette (1950), 1647.Google Scholar
26 C.C.L. Convention Proceedings (1950), 89–90.Google Scholar
27 Labour Gazette (1950), 1807.Google Scholar
28 Labour Gazette (1951), 10.Google Scholar
29 Ibid. (1950), 1991–2.
30 C.C.L. Convention Proceedings (1951), 28–9.Google Scholar
31 T.L.C. Convention Proceedings (1951), 265–75, 368.Google Scholar
32 C.C.L. Convention Proceedings (1951), 93–4.Google Scholar
33 Labour Gazette (1952), 1185 Google Scholar; T.L.C. Convention Proceedings (1952), 387–98.Google Scholar
34 C.C.L. Convention Proceedings (1952), 20–1.Google Scholar
35 Ibid. (1953), 36–7.
36 T.L.C. Convention Proceedings (1953), 355–60Google Scholar
37 C.C.L. Convention Proceedings (1954), R33–4.Google Scholar
38 Ibid. (1954), 79–84; T.L.C. Convention Proceedings (1954), 77–83 Google Scholar; Labour Gazette (1954), 217, 1246–8, 1395, 1674.Google Scholar
39 C.C.L. Convention Proceedings (1955), 78 Google Scholar; T.L.C. Convention Proceedings (1955), 307 Google Scholar; Labour Gazette (1955), 1264.Google Scholar
40 C.L.C. Convention Proceedings (1956), 94–7.Google Scholar
41 T.L.C. Convention Proceedings (1939), 150–3.Google Scholar
42 Ibid.
43 Note the collapse of the American United Labor Policy Committee in the fall of 1951: Monthly Labor Review (U.S. Dept. of Labor, 09, 1951), iii.Google Scholar
44 A.F.L. Convention Proceedings (1953), 82–9.Google Scholar
45 Ibid., 634–5.
46 Resolution on Achievement of Labor Unity (no date; apparently presented to the final A.F.L. and C. I. O. conventions, 1955).Google Scholar
47 lbid., p. 8, s. 4, and p. 34, s. 2.
48 Canadian Merger Agreement, p. 3, s. 2 (g); Resolution on Achievement of Labor Unity, p.l8, art. V (l).
49 Canadian Merger Agreement, p. 3 s. 2 (e), (f), (i), (j) and (m). Resolution on Achievement of Labor Unity, pp. 6–7, s. 3 (b), (c), (e), (f), and (g); p. 21, art. VIII (1) and (2); p. 23, art. IX and art. X (1); and p. 24, art. XI (2).
50 Labour Gazette (1946), 1381.Google Scholar
51 Canadian Merger Agreement, p. 2, s. 1 (a).
52 See the Joint T.L.C.-C.C.L. Brief to the Gordon Commission, 30–5.
53 C.L.C. Convention Proceedings (1956), 103–4.Google Scholar
54 Ibid., 49.
- 3
- Cited by