Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:13:28.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Empirical Testing and the Income Expenditure Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2014

George Macesich
George Macesich*
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes
Information
Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science/Revue canadienne de economiques et science politique , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , August 1966 , pp. 377 - 379
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Albert Ando and Franco Modigliani, “The Relative Stability of Monetary Velocity and the Investment Multiplier”; Michael DePrano and Thomas Mayer, “Tests of the Relative Importance of Autonomous Expenditures and Money”; Milton Friedman and David Meiselman, “Reply to Ando and Modigliani and to DePrano and Mayer”; and rejoinders by Ando, and Modigliani, and DePrano, and Mayer, , American Economic Review, 09 1965.Google Scholar

2 “The Quantity Theory and the Income Expenditure Theory in an Open Economy: Canada, 1926-1958,” this Journal, XXX (08 1964), 368-90.Google Scholar C. L. Barber, “The Quantity Theory and the Income Expenditure Theory in the Open Economy, 1926-1958: A Comment,” this issue of the Journal.