Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T15:14:50.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conservation and Capital Theory: Rejoinder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2014

Anthony Scott
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Memoranda
Information
Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science/Revue canadienne de economiques et science politique , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , February 1956 , pp. 99 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Gordon, H. Scott, “The Economic Theory of a Common-Property Resource: The Fishery,” Journal of Political Economy, 04, 1954 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and a paper by J. W. Milliman on the economics of ground-water use, which will appear in the Southern Economic Journal. See also my own contributions: “The Fishery: The Objectives of Sole Ownership,” Journal of Political Economy, 04, 1955 Google Scholar; and Natural Resources: The Economics of Conservation (Toronto, 1955).Google Scholar

2 See Report of the Ontario Royal Commission on Forestry [Kennedy Report] (Toronto 1947).Google Scholar

3 London, 1941, 216 ff. and 416 ff., esp. 418.

4 See especially “Utility Analysis and Interest,” Economic Journal, 03, 1936, 48.Google Scholar

5 London, 1948.