Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T02:39:22.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Economist Looks at Economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2014

W. A. Mackintosh*
Affiliation:
Queen's University
Get access

Extract

Last year you heard my distinguished predecessor, Dr. Coats, set forth a by-no-means modest claim for statistics in his brilliant address “Statistics Comes of Age”. Sweeping as his claim was, Dr. Coats, by his great organizing and administrative abilities, has established it in this country. That he has through the shifting experiences of more than thirty years of public administration retained his vision and resourcefulness, is evidence of a high courage.

It is now more than a hundred and sixty years since Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations, popularly conceived to be the beginning of specialized study of economics, was launched into the world of letters and affairs, and it is about fifty since Economics became a subject of specialized study in Canadian universities. One has only to scan university examination papers of the late eighties, based mainly on John Stuart Mill and Fawcett's little manual, to realize that in form at least the subject has changed profoundly. But what has been accomplished? Is it an instrument or a game that has been fashioned? If an instrument, what are its limitations?

These and related questions have often been asked and answered, and the answers are not always to the economist's liking. Three years ago the then president of this Association asked, “What is left of Adam Smith?” and answered in substance, nothing except the economic man. Avoiding discussion of his exception, and adding one or two of our own, we can accept his answer as broadly not untrue. The implication, however, that modern economics even in rudimentary form is set forth in the Wealth of Nations, needs emphatic denial. As Professor Schumpeter has justly said: “Classical theory has no other claim to its epithet than pristine simplicity.” And yet, the economics of the Wealth of Nations is of a type which the economist's critics would have him adopt—the espousal of a doctrine, the initiation of a movement, propagandizing a policy. Any body of doctrine limited and attached to a policy is necessarily tied to a particular era; most of the Wealth of Nations is now of historical interest only.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 1937

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Published in Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, vol. II, 08, 1936, pp. 269–87.Google Scholar

2 Stephen Leacock in ibid., vol. I, Feb., 1935, pp. 41-51.

3 “The Conception of a National Interest”, (ibid., vol. I, Aug., 1935, pp. 396-408).

4 Vol. III, May, 1937, pp. 250-63.