No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Fusion of Government and Business
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 November 2014
Extract
Seventy years ago Bagehot composed his epitaph on the Poor Law Commissioners of 1834. To his own generation, it must have sounded like the last word on attempts to administer any aspect of public affairs by independent authorities without a responsible parliamentary head. The dethronement of the “three kings of Somerset House” demonstrated the prime condition of parliamentary government. The lesson they taught was obvious and the more thoroughgoing of Bagehot's contemporaries were all for denying to bureaucratic irresponsibility the solace even of a last sanctuary at the British Museum.
Even fools, we are told, will learn the lessons of experience but it seems that some still more elementary form of education will have to be devised for political democracies. Parliamentary government has been adopted all over the world but it has always been accompanied by some defiance of basic principle. Some branch of government activity has always been wrongly sheltered from parliamentary discipline and guidance. With the twentieth century, these occasional infractions have become chronic. In England itself, affairs of the gravest national import are being entrusted to bodies without any direct responsibility to Parliament. To the democracy, the story of the “three kings of Somerset House” is a political fairy tale. It laughs and then runs off to play at trains with the London Transport Board. In some such fashion, we may surmise, Bagehot might have reasoned on the facts of to-day.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science/Revue canadienne de economiques et science politique , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , August 1936 , pp. 301 - 316
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 1936
References
1 Bagehot, Walter, The English Constitution (Kegan Paul, 1909, reprinted from the second edition), pp. 189–90.Google Scholar
2 Smith, J. Toulmin, Government by Commission, Illegal and Pernicious, etc. (London, 1849), pp. 307–13.Google Scholar
3 See Kretschmer, Ernst, in Annals of Collective Economy, vol. IV, 1928, pp. 71, 97 Google Scholar, for accounts of the extraordinary developments in Germany. This journal has broken many lances on behalf of public ownership and while that may affect its judgments, it does not enter into bald statements of fact.
4 Bagehot, ,The English Constitution, pp. 10 ff.Google Scholar
5 Dimock, M. E., British Public Utilities and National Development (London, 1933), pp. 32–43.Google Scholar
6 SirMaxwell, P. B.,On the Interpretation of Statutes (Toronto, 1920), p. 528 Google Scholar, and cases there cited.
7 Dimock, , British Public Utilities, p. 310.Google Scholar
8 See Bauer, John, Effective Regulation of Public Utilities (New York, 1925).Google Scholar
9 Hankin, F., in The Liberal Way (Toronto, 1933), p. 59.Google Scholar
10 Hankin, F. and MacDermot, T. W. L., Recovery by Control (Toronto, 1933), p. 109.Google Scholar
11 Dimock, , British Public Utilities, pp. 307–15.Google Scholar
12 Morrison, Herbert, Socialization and Transport (London, 1933), p. 147.Google Scholar
13 “Consolidation in the Electric Utility Industry” (Annals of the American Academy of Political Science, vol. CXVIII, 1925, p. 149 Google Scholar).
14 See generally Berle, A. A. and Means, G. C., Modern Corporation and Private Property (New York, 1932).Google Scholar
15 Laissez Faire and Communism (New Republic Inc., 1926), pp. 61–3.Google Scholar
16 Urwick, L., “A Republic of Administration” (Journal of Public Administration, vol. XIII, 1935, p. 263 CrossRefGoogle Scholar). The pages of this journal contain a great deal of material which bears upon the problem of this paper.
17 Morrison, Socialization and Transport, chaps, xi-xiii, where sharply opposed views on this question are discussed at length.
18 Hawtrey, R. G., “The Finance of Publicly Owned Utilities” (Journal of Public Administration, vol. IV, 1926, pp. 358–9).Google Scholar
19 Bagehot, , The English Constitution, p. 14.Google Scholar
20 Hankin, and MacDerraot, , Recovery by Control, pp. 334–5.Google Scholar
21 Morrison, Socialization and Transport, chap, iv, where the argument for undivided responsibility is put with great force.
22 Broodbank, J. G. Sir, in Journal of Public Administration, vol. IV, 1926, p. 314.Google Scholar
23 Sir John Reith, in ibid., vol. VIII, 1930, pp. 29-30.