Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:57:26.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic Aspects of Federalism: A Prairie View

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2014

R. McQueen
R. McQueen*
Affiliation:
The University of Manitoba
Get access

Extract

As one reads the report of the Nova Scotia Royal Commission of Economic Inquiry, he becomes aware that he is in a new area lying between the field of economics proper and the field of political science. In this area the economist gropes uneasily, finding the familiar concepts of economics strained in an attempt to answer unfamiliar questions. There is an important difference, however, between the case for Nova Scotia, as it was presented to the Royal Commission and the case for the Prairie Provinces. A great part of the brief for Nova Scotia is concerned with negotiations preliminary to the passing of the British North America Act and many of the grievances rightly go back to that period. The Prairie Provinces entered a Confederation already in existence with a lively sense of benefits to be obtained. The alternative was not, as for Nova Scotia, of coming into Confederation or of remaining a separate colony, but of coming in or of remaining a territory of the Dominion. We were not beguiled into Confederation with the connivance of the secretary of state for the colonies. Nor have we since coming into Confederation seen our formerly prospering industries languish and die. We are not obsessed with the memory of a glory that has departed. On the contrary, our growth was steadily upward, interrupted only by disturbances that were common to the whole country. Our protest is hot concerning what we once were and now are but rather about what we are now and what we might be,—but this does not mean that the protest is any the less real. The protest of to-day is not new in anything except its vigour and yet it manifests a difference in degree that is equivalent to a change in quality.

Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science/Revue canadienne de economiques et science politique , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , August 1935 , pp. 352 - 367
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Province of Nova Scotia, Report of the Royal Commission Provincial Economic Inquiry (Halifax, 1934).Google Scholar

2 Report of the Royal Commission on Price Spreads (Ottawa, 1935), p. 9.Google Scholar

3 Innis, H. A., “Canadian Frontiers of Settlement: A Review” (Geographical Review, vol. XXV, 01, 1935, p. 99).Google Scholar The reference is to a table on p. 102 of Mackintosh, W. A., Economic Problems of the Prairie Provinces (Toronto, 1935).Google Scholar

4 Allen, Wm., The Farm Outlook for Saskatchewan, 1933 (Saskatoon, University of Saskatchewan, 1933).Google Scholar

5 Mackintosh, W. A., Prairie Settlement: The Geographical Setting (Toronto, 1934), p. 232.Google Scholar

6 Beatty, E. W., Agriculture and Prosperity, a speech delivered before the Canadian Club, Toronto, 05 20, 1935 Google Scholar, advertised in the daily press of May 23, 1935.

7 Hurd, W. B., “Population Movements in Canada 1921-31, and their Implications” (Papers and Proceedings of the Canadian Political Science Association, vol. VI, 1934, pp. 220-37)Google Scholar; Hurd, W. B. and Cameron, Jean C., “Population Movements in Canada, 1921-31: Some Further Considerations” (Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, vol. I, 05, 1935, pp. 222-45).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Ripley, W. Z., Railroads, Rates and Regulation (New York, 1923), p. 37.Google Scholar

9 Province of Nova Scotia, Report of the Royal Commission Provincial Economic Inquiry, ch. iv.

10 Three Canadian Problems, an address delivered before the Board of Trade of Regina, Feb. 5, 1935.

11 Agriculture and Prosperity.

12 Evidence of John I. McFarland before the Select Standing Committee of the House of Commons on Banking and Commerce, March 22, 1934.

13 Maxwell, J. A., “The Dispute over the Federal Domain in Canada” (Journal of Political Economy, vol. XLI, 1933, pp. 777–805)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; “Provincial Conferences and Better Terms” (Papers and Proceedings of the Canadian Political Science Association, vol. VI, 1934, pp. 162-74).Google Scholar

14 Debates of the House of Commons of the Dominion of Canada, 1903, as quoted in Report of Royal Commission on the Natural Resources of Saskatchewan (Ottawa, 1935), p. 47.Google Scholar

15 Debates of the House of Commons of the Dominion of Canada, 1905, as quoted in Report of Royal Commission on the Natural Resources of Saskatchewan (Ottawa, 1935), p. 47.Google Scholar

16 Bladen, V. W., “The Theory of Costs in an Economy based on the Production of Staples: Canada and Wheat” (The Canadian Economy and its Problems edited by Innis, H. A. and Plumptre, A. F. W., Toronto, 1934, pp. 135-43).Google Scholar

17 Cf. Clark, Evans, The Internal Debts of the United States (New York, 1933), p. 62.Google Scholar

18 Pigou, A. C., Industrial Fluctuations (London, 1927), ch. v.Google Scholar