Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T12:58:56.996Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Volatile compounds from non-preferred wheat spikes reduce oviposition by Sitodiplosis mosellana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2012

A.H. Gharalari
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2
M.A.H. Smith*
Affiliation:
Cereal Research Centre, 195 Dafoe Road, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2M9
S.L. Fox
Affiliation:
Cereal Research Centre, 195 Dafoe Road, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2M9
R.J. Lamb
Affiliation:
Cereal Research Centre, 195 Dafoe Road, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2M9
*
2Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).

Abstract

Female wheat midges, Sitodiplosis mosellana (Géhin) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), were provided with wheat spikes, Triticum aestivum L. (Poaceae), for oviposition while being exposed to air that had passed over wheat spikes of contrasting genotype or growth stage. Spikes of postanthesis ‘Roblin’ and preanthesis ‘Key 10’ are known to deter oviposition. Volatiles emitted by these spikes suppressed oviposition on preanthesis ‘Roblin', which is preferred for oviposition. Volatiles emitted by spikes of preanthesis ‘Roblin’ did not increase oviposition on preanthesis ‘Key 10'. Reduced oviposition on a resistant genotype and on a deterrent growth stage of wheat is consistent with production of deterrent volatiles rather than a lack of stimulatory volatiles.

Résumé

Nous avons fourni des épis de blé, Triticum aestivum L. (Poaceae), à des femelles de la cécidomyie du blé, Sitodiplosis mosellana (Géhin) (Diptera : Cecidomyiidae), pour la ponte, alors qu'elles étaient exposées à de l'air qui avait traversé des épis de blé de divers génotypes ou stades de croissance. On sait que les épis ‘Roblin’ après l'anthèse et que les épis ‘Key 10’ avant l'anthèse inhibent la ponte. Les substances volatiles émises par ces épis empêchent la ponte sur ‘Roblin’ avant l'anthèse qui est le substrat préféré pour la ponte. Les substances volatiles émises par les épis ‘Roblin’ avant l'anthèse n'augmentent pas la ponte sur ‘Key 10’ avant l'anthèse. La réduction de la ponte sur un génotype résistant et sur un stade de croissance dissuasif chez le blé est compatible avec la production de substances volatiles dissuasives plutôt qu'avec l'absence de substances volatiles stimulatrices.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Behavior & Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Birkett, M.A.Bruce, T.J.A.Martin, J.L.Smart, L.E.Oakley, J.Wadhams, L.J. 2004. Responses of female orange wheat blossom midge, Sitodiplosis mosellana, to wheat panicle volatiles. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 30: 13191328.Google Scholar
Ding, H.Lamb, R.J. 1999. Oviposition and larval establishment of Sitodiplosis mosellana (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) on wheat (Gramineae) at different growth stages. The Canadian Entomologist, 131: 475481.Google Scholar
Foster, S.P.Harris, M.O. 1992. Foliar chemicals of wheat and related grasses influencing oviposition by Hessian fly, Mayetiola destructor (Say) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1811: 19651980.Google Scholar
Ganehiarachchi, G.A.S.M.Harris, M.O. 2007. Oviposition behavior of orange wheat blossom midge on low vs. high-ranked grass seed heads. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 123: 287297.Google Scholar
Ganehiarachchi, G.A.S.M.Harris, M.O. 2009. Ovipositing females of a short-lived gall midge take time to assess suboptimal grass seed heads. Physiological Entomology, 34: 119128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gharalari, A.H.Smith, M.A.H.Fox, S.L.Lamb, R.J. 2009a. The relationship between morphological traits of the spring wheat spike and oviposition deterrence to orange wheat blossom midge. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 132: 182190.Google Scholar
Gharalari, A.H.Fox, S.L.Smith, M.A.H.Lamb, R.J. 2009b. Oviposition deterrence in spring wheat, Triticum aestivum, against orange wheat blossom midge, Sitodiplosis mosellana: implications for inheritance of deterrence. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 133: 7483.Google Scholar
Harris, M.O.Rose, S. 1990. Chemical, color, and tactile cues influencing oviposition behavior of the Hessian fly (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Environmental Entomology, 19: 303308.Google Scholar
Lamb, R.J.McKenzie, R.I.H.Wise, I.L.Barker, P.S.Smith, M.A.H. 2000. Resistance to Sitodiplosis mosellana (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) in spring wheat (Gramineae). The Canadian Entomologist, 132: 591605.Google Scholar
Lamb, R.J.Smith, M.A.H.Wise, I.L.Clarke, P. 2001. Oviposition deterrence to Sitodiplosis mosellana (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae): a source of resistance for durum wheat (Gramineae). The Canadian Entomologist, 133: 579591.Google Scholar
Lamb, R.J.Wise, I.L.Smith, M.A.H.McKenzie, R.I.H.Thomas, J.Olfert, O.O. 2002. Oviposition deterrence against Sitodiplosis mosellana (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) in spring wheat (Gramineae). The Canadian Entomologist, 134: 8596.Google Scholar
Lamb, R.J.Sridhar, P.Smith, M.A.H.Wise, I.L. 2003. Oviposition preference and offspring performance of a wheat midge Sitodiplosis mosellana (Géhin) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) on defended and less defended wheat plants. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 322: 414420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 2002. SAS/STAT user's guide. Version 9.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
Smith, M.A.H.Lamb, R.J. 2001. Factors influencing oviposition by Sitodiplosis mosellana (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) on wheat spikes (Gramineae). The Canadian Entomologist, 133:533548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zadoks, J.C.Chang, T.T.Konzak, C.F. 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research, 14: 415421.Google Scholar