Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:43:09.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

VISUAL DETERMINATION OF SEX OF DIAMONDBACK MOTH LARVAE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Yong-Biao Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA 96822
Bruce E. Tabashnik
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA 96822

Extract

The diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), is a major worldwide pest of cruciferous vegetables (Talekar and Shelton 1993). Male and female adults of this species can be accurately identified by visible differences in their external genitalia. According to Robertson (1939), the sex of pupae can also be identified, but, in our experience, this approach is more difficult. For some types of research, determination of larval sex would be useful. For example, one could determine sex-specific responses of larvae to a treatment by observing mortality, development rate, or behavior of male and female larvae separately. In studies requiring hybrid mating between different strains of diamondback moth (Tabashnik et al. 1992), one could isolate groups of male larvae separately from female larvae to avoid mating within a strain. Some lepidopteran larvae can be sexed by the gonads being visible through the cuticle of the fifth abdominal segment or by the position of external pits marking the location of the genital discs in the eighth and ninth abdominal segments (Stehr 1987). But, because of their small size, it is not practical to sex diamondback moth larvae by external pits and we have found no studies in which male and female larvae were identified by gonadal form. Herein we report that third- and fourth-instar larvae of diamondback moth can be sexed efficiently and reliably.

Type
Note
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Robertson, P.L. 1939. Diamondback moth investigation in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Science and Technology (A) 20: 330A364A.Google Scholar
Stehr, F.W. 1987. pp. 304–305 in Immature Insects. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, IA. 754 pp.Google Scholar
Tabashnik, B.E., Schwartz, J.M.Finson, N., and Johnson, M.W.. 1992. Inheritance of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 85: 10461055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talekar, N.S., and Shelton, A.M.. 1993. Biology, ecology, and management of diamondback moth. Annual Review of Entomology 38: 275301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar