Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:03:12.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TOXICOLOGICAL STUDIES ON THE CARROT WEEVIL, LISTRONOTUS OREGONENSIS (COLEOPTERA: CURCULIONIDAE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

P. Martel ,
C. R. Harris  and
H. J. Svec
P. Martel
Affiliation:
Research Station, Canada Department of Agriculture, St. Jean, Quebec
C. R. Harris
Affiliation:
Research Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, London, Ontario
H. J. Svec
Affiliation:
Research Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, London, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Laboratory studies were conducted to determine the toxicity of a number of insecticides to adults of the carrot weevil, Listronotus oregonensis (LeConte). Initial screening tests indicated that, in general, carrot weevil adults were quite tolerant to insecticides. However, several materials showed sufficient activity as direct contact, residual contact-stomach, and soil insecticides to warrant testing under field conditions. These included Zinophos® (O,O-diethyl 0–2 pyrazinyl phosphorothioate), WL 24073 [O-(2-chloro-l-(2,5-dichlorophenyl)vinyl) O-methyl ethylphosphonothioate], WL 25735 [O-(2-chloro-1-(2,5-dichlorophenyl) vinyl) O-methyl methylphosphonothioate], Pirimiphos-methyl® (O-[2-(diethylamino)-6-methyl-4-pyrimidinyl] O,O-dimethyl phosphorothioate), tetrachlorvinphos, and parathion. Although less active, Biothion® [(O,O′-thiodi-p-phenylene) O,O,O′,O′-tetramethyl phosphorothioate], carbofuran, and chlorpyrifos were also considered sufficiently effective to warrant further study.

Résumé

Des essais en laboratoire ont été menés pour déterminer la toxicité d’insecticides contre l’adulte du charançon de la carotte, Listronotus oregonensis (LeConte) par contact direct, par contact et ingestion et par application au sol. Les tests d’élimination préliminaire par contact direct ont montré que 28 des 45 insecticides étaient plus toxiques que le DDT. La majorité des insecticides se sont avérés plus efficaces par contact et ingestion. L’efficacité de certains insecticides prometteurs a été réduite par application au sol. Plusieurs insecticides ont démontré une activité assez grande pour être essayés en plein champ. Parmi ceux-ci, l’on retrouve Zinophos, WL 24073 [O-(2-chloro-1-(2,5-dichlorophenyl) vinyl) O-methyl ethylphosphonothioate], Pirimiphos-methyl® (O-[2-(diethylamino)-6-methyl-4-pyrimidinyl] O,O-dimethyl phosphorothioate) et parathion.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 107 , Issue 5 , May 1975 , pp. 471 - 475
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, W. S. 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. econ. Ent. 18: 265–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, S. C. 1926. The economic importance of the carrot weevil in Illinois. J. econ. Ent. 19: 490–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finney, D. J. 1952. Probit analysis. A statistical treatment of the sigmoid response curve. Cambridge Univ. Press. 318 pp.Google Scholar
Harris, C. R. 1973. Laboratory evaluation of candidate materials as potential soil insecticides. IV. J. econ. Ent. 66: 216–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, C. R. and Svec, H. J.. 1970. Toxicological studies on cutworms. VI. Laboratory studies on the toxicity of several experimental insecticides to the dark-sided cutworm as soil treatments and stomach poisons. J. econ. Ent. 63: 605–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, C. R., Svec, H. J., and Sans, W. W.. 1973. Toxicological studies on cutworms. IX. Laboratory and field microplot studies on effectiveness and persistence of some experimental insecticides used for control of the dark-sided cutworm. J. econ. Ent. 66: 199–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepper, B. B. 1942. The carrot weevil, Listronotus latiusculus (Bohs), in New Jersey and its control. N. J. agric. Exp. Stn Bull. 693.Google Scholar
Perron, J. P. 1971. Le charancon de la carotte. Quebec Horticole 11: 16–18.Google Scholar
Potter, C. 1952. An improved laboratory apparatus for applying direct sprays and surface films, with data on electrostatic charge on atomized spray fluids. Ann. app. Biol. 39: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitcomb, W. D. 1965. The carrot weevil in Massachusetts. Biology and control. Agric. Exp. Stn Univ. Mass. Bull. 550.Google Scholar
Wright, J. M. 1957. Laboratory studies on the life cycle of the carrot weevil. J. econ. Ent. 51: 37–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar