Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:41:28.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Toxicological and Histophysiological Study of Certain New Insecticides as “Stomach Poisons” to the Honey Bee Apis mellifera L.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

E. H. Salkeld
E. H. Salkeld
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology and Department of Apiculture, Ontario Agricultural College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Effect of DDT on the Mid-Gut of the Bee

The mid-gut from twelve bees poisoned with the pure para isomer of DDT was studied. Of these, five contained the large bubble of gas described on page 48: their histological appearance was almost identical but it differed in some ways from those which contained no bubble.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 83 , Issue 3 , March 1951 , pp. 53 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, J. R. (1945). Cytological Technique (2nd ed.). London: Methuen and Company Limited.Google Scholar
Bliss, C. I. (1935). The comparison of dosage-mortality data. Ann. Appl. Biol., 22: 307–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodenstein, D. (1946). Investigation of the locus of action of DDT in flies Drosophila virilis. Biol. Bull. 90: 148–157.Google Scholar
Butt, F. H. (1934). The Origin of the Peritrophic Membrane in Sciara and the Honey Bee. Psyche, 41: 51–56.Google Scholar
Chadwick, L. and Hill, D. (1947). J. Neurophysiol., 10: 235.Google Scholar
Eckert, J. E. (1948). The relations of agricultural chemicals to bee-keeping. In report of the State Apiarist for 1948, pp. 64–69. State of Iowa.Google Scholar
Eltringham, H. (1930). Histological and Illustrative Methods for Entomologists. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Finney, D. J. (1947). Probit Analysis, London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Häfliger, E. (1949). Comparative toxicity of various insecticides to the honey bee. J. econ. Ent. 42: 523–31.Google Scholar
Hartzell, A. (1945). Histological effects of certain sprays and activators on the nerves and muscles of the house fly Musca domestica. Contribs. Boyce Thompson Inst. 13: 443–54.Google Scholar
Hertig, M. (1923). The normal and pathological histology of the ventriculus of the honey bee with special reference to infection with Nosema apis. J. Parasit., 9: 109–140.Google Scholar
Hoskins, W. M. and Harrison, A. S. (1934). The buffering power of the contents of the ventriculus of the honey bee and its effect upon the toxicity of arsenic. J. econ. Ent., 27: 924–42.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. H. (1932). Methods for the study of the Internal Anatomy of Insects. Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar
Ludwig, D. (1946). The effect of DDT on the metabolism of the Japanese beetle Popilla Japonica, Newman. Ann. ent. Soc. Amer., 39: 496.Google Scholar
Martin, H. (1948). Some biochemical aspects of insecticide research. Research 1: 640–646.Google Scholar
Mazur, A. and Bolandsky, O. (1946). J. Biol. Chem., 163: 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrill, et al. (1946). J. Cellular Comp. Physiol., 28: 465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalf, R. L. (1948). The mode of action of organic insecticides. National Research Council, Washington.Google Scholar
Morrison, F. O. (1943). The standardizing of a laboratory method for comparing the toxicity of contact insecticides. Can. J. Research. Sec. C. 21: 35–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musgrave, A. J. (1937). The histology of the male and female reproductive organs of Ephestia kühniella Zeller (Lepidoptera). Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. Series B, 337–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musgrave, A. J. (1946). Tests on clothing impregnated with DDT as an anti-louse measure. Bull. ent. Res., 37: 43–56.Google Scholar
Parfentjev, J. A. (1929). Researches in insect toxicology. Trans. IV Internat, ent. Congr., (1928) pp. 857–64.Google Scholar
Pavlovsky, E. N. and Zarin, E. J. (1922). On the structure of the alimentary canal and its ferments in the bee Apis mellifera L. Quart. J. Mier. Sci., 66: 509–56.Google Scholar
Pilat, M. (1935). Histological researches into the action of insecticides on the intestinal tube of insects. Bull. ent. Res., 26: 165–80.Google Scholar
Richards, A. G. and Cutkomp, L. K. (1945). Neuropathology in Insects. J.N.Y. ent. Soc. 53: 313.Google Scholar
Rider, F. R. (1939). An Introduction to Modern Statistical Methods, New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Shephard, H. H. (1939). The Chemistry and Toxicology of Insecticides. Minneapolis: Burgess Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, R. E. (1925). Anatomy and Physiology of the Honey Bee. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc.Google Scholar
Tietz, H. M. (1924). The solubility of arsenate of lead in the digestive fluids of the honey bee. J. econ. Ent., 17: 471–77.Google Scholar
Tobias, J. and Kolros, J. (1946). Biol. Bull., 91: 247.Google Scholar
Voegtlin, C., Dyer, H. A. and Leonard, C. S. (1925). On the specificity of the so-called arsenic receptors in the higher animals. J. Pharm. and Exp. Therap., 25: 297–307.Google Scholar
Welsh, and Gordon, (1947). The mode of action of certain insecticides on the Arthropod nerave axon. J. Cellular Comp. Physiol., 30: 147–169.Google Scholar
White, G. F. (1918). A note on the muscular coat of the ventriculus of the honey bee Apis mellifera. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash., 20: 152–154.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1947). The Principles of Insect Physiology (2nd ed.). London: Methuen and Company Limited.Google Scholar
Witt, P. (1947). Z. Naturforsch, 2b: 361.Google Scholar