Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:58:57.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THRIPS (THYSANOPTERA) DIVERSITY IN A SUGAR MAPLE (ACERACEAE) PLANTATION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

David A. J. Teulon ,
E. Alan Cameron  and
Sueo Nakahara
David A. J. Teulon*
Affiliation:
New Zealand Institute for Crop & Food Research Ltd., PB 4704, Christchurch, New Zealand
E. Alan Cameron
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Penn State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA 16802
Sueo Nakahara
Affiliation:
Systematic Entomology Laboratory, USDA-ARS, 10300 Baltimore Ave., Beltsville, Maryland, USA 20705
*
1Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed (E-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Recent damage to sugar maple, Acer saccharurn Marsh., by pear thnps, Taeniothrips inconsequens, in the northeast of the United States and adjacent parts of Canada has led to much research on this pest (Teulon et al. 1993; Teulon and Cameron 1996; Parker and Skinner 1997). A detailed description of the univoltine pear thrips' life history is reported in Teulon et al. (1998). Although T: inconsequens is the dominant species in sugar maple, other thrips may also be important as herbivores, detritivores, or predators and need to be taken into account in sampling or monitoring programmes. This article describes the diversity of thrips in a sugar maple plantation in central Pennsylvania, United States.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 131 , Issue 5 , October 1999 , pp. 629 - 633
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ananthakrishnan, T.N. 1990. Reproductive Biology of Thrips. Oak Park: IndiraGoogle Scholar
Heming, B.S. 1991. Order Thysanoptera. pp. 1–21in Stehr, F.W. (Ed), Immature Insects. Vol. 2. Dubuque: Kendall Hunt Publ. Co.Google Scholar
Parker, B.L., Skinner, M. 1997. Integrated pest management (IPM) in tree crops. pp. 615–38 in Lewis, T. (Ed), Thrips as Crop Pests. Wallingford, UK: CAB InternationalGoogle Scholar
Teulon, D.A.J., Cameron, E.A. 1996. The pear thrips in northern hardwood forests of the north-eastern United States. Folia Entomologica Hungarica LVII (Suppl.): 143–50Google Scholar
Teulon, D.A.J., Penman, D.R. 1986. A rearing method for the New Zealand flower thrips. Proceedings of the New Zealand Weed & Pest Control Conference 39: 244–45Google Scholar
Teulon, D.A.J., Kolb, T.E., Cameron, E.A., McCormick, L.H., Hoover, G.A. 1993. Pear thrips, Taeniothrips inconsequens (Uzel) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), on sugar maple, Acer saccharum Marsh.: a review. Zoology (Journal of Pure and Applied Zoology) 4: 355–80Google Scholar
Teulon, D.A.J., Groninger, J.W., Cameron, E.A. 1994. Distribution and host plant associations of Taeniothrips inconsequens (Uzel) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Environmental Entomology 23: 587–611Google Scholar
Teulon, D.A.J., Leskey, T.C., Cameron, E.A. 1998. Pear thrips Taeniothrips inconsequens (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) life history and population dynamics in sugar maple in Pennsylvania. Bulletin of Entomological Research 88: 83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, J.G. 1936. A study of the biology of the flower thrips Frankliniella tritici (Fitch) with specialized reference to cotton. South Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 306Google Scholar