Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:34:37.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THERMAL ACCUMULATIONS, DIAPAUSE, AND OVIPOSITION IN A CONIFER-INHABITING PREDATOR, CHRYSOPA HARRISII (NEUROPTERA)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Maurice J. Tauber  and
Catherine A. Tauber
Maurice J. Tauber
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
Catherine A. Tauber
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The adults of Chrysopa harrisii Fitch, which are not predaceous, overwinter in a state of reproductive diapause. During both the dormant and the reproductive periods they remain dark green, a colour apparently adapted to the species’ occurrence on conifers. Two to three generations per season are possible in the Ithaca, N.Y., area.

At 75°F, which is the optimum constant temperature for development and survival, the time from oviposition to adult eclosion is 29 days. Theoretical thresholds for development of all stages are relatively high, between 50° and 57°F, and development from egg to adult requires 566 heat degree days.

In the laboratory, the critical photoperiod for diapause induction is between LD 13:11 and LD 14:10; short days maintain diapause for approximately 45 days (at 75°F); long days terminate diapause. Both newly-emerged and reproductively-active adults are extremely sensitive to diapause-inducing photoperiods. In the field, all adults emerging on 5 September or later enter diapause and it appears that diapause induction in the Ithaca population begins in the latter part of August. Short days maintain diapause until the end of December, and neither long days, increasing day lengths, nor low temperatures play a role in hastening diapause termination in nature.

In timing its vernal reproduction, C. harrisii has evolved a strategy that combines an early-ending diapause with an apparently relatively high temperature threshold for post-diapause development. Therefore, although diapause ends around the winter solstice, heat accumulation is prevented until much later, when temperatures are relatively high.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 106 , Issue 9 , September 1974 , pp. 969 - 978
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beck, S. D. 1968. Insect photoperiodism. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Bland, R. G. 1971. Photoperiod-diapause relationships in the alfalfa weevil, Hypera postica. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 64: 1163–1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danilevsky, A. S. 1965. Photoperiodism and seasonal development of insects. (English translation.) Oliver & Boyd, London.Google Scholar
Deseö, K. V. 1973. Side-effect of diapause inducing factors on the reproductive activity of some lepidopterous species. Nature. Lond. 242: 126–127.Google ScholarPubMed
DeWitt, J. R. and Armbrust, E. J.. 1972. Photoperiodic sensitivity of the alfalfa weevil during larval development. J. econ. Ent. 65: 1289–1292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingle, H. 1968. Life history and population consequences of density, photoperiod, and temperature in a migrant insect, the milkweed bug Oncopeltus. Am. Nat. 102: 149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelmann, F. 1970. The physiology of insect reproduction. Pergamon Press, New York.Google Scholar
Hagen, K. S., Tassan, R. L., and Sawall, E. F. Jr., 1970. Some ecophysiological relationships between certain Chrysopa, honeydews and yeasts. Boll. Lab. Ent. agr. Filippo Silvestri Port. 28: 113–124.Google Scholar
Harcourt, D. G. and Cass, L. M.. 1966. Photoperiodism and fecundity in Plutella maculipennis (Curt). Nature, Lond. 210: 217–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, R. W. 1967. Temperature effects on embryonic development in insects. A. Rev. Ent. 12: 15–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lees, A. D. 1955. The physiology of diapause in arthropods. Cambridge Univ. Press, London.Google Scholar
Messenger, P. S. 1959. Bioclimatic studies with insects. A. Rev. Ent. 4: 183–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R. F. and Fulton, W. C.. 1970. Models for the development and survival of Hyphantria cunea in relation to temperature and humidity. Mem. ent. Soc. Can., No. 70. 60 pp.Google Scholar
Perez, Y., Verdier, M., and Pener, M. P.. 1971. The effect of photoperiod on male sexual behaviour in a North Adriatic strain of the migratory locust. Ent. exp. appl. 14: 245–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Propp, G. D., Tauber, M. J., and Tauber, C. A.. 1969. Diapause in the neuropteran Chrysopa oculata. J. Insect Physiol. 15: 1749–1757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldon, J. K. and MacLeod, E. G.. 1971. Studies on the biology of the Chrysopidae. II. The feeding behavior of the adult of Chrysopa carnea (Neuroptera). Psyche, Camb. 78: 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. C. and Newsom, L. D.. 1971. The biology of Amblyseius fallacis (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) at various temperature and photoperiod regimes. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63: 460–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauber, C. A. Systematics of North American chrysopid larvae: Chrysopa carnea group (Neuroptera). Can. Ent (in press).Google Scholar
Tauber, C. A. and Tauber, M. J.. 1973. Diversification and secondary intergradation of two Chrysopa carnea strains (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Can. Ent. 105: 1153–1167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauber, M. J. and Tauber, C. A.. 1969. Diapause in Chrysopa carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). I. Effect of photoperiod on reproductively active adults. Can. Ent. 101: 364–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauber, M. J. and Tauber, C. A.. 1970. Adult diapause in Chrysopa carnea: Stages sensitive to photoperiodic induction. J. Insect Physiol. 16: 2075–2080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauber, M. J. and Tauber, C. A.. 1971. An autosomal recessive mutant in a neuropteran. Can. Ent. 103: 906–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauber, M. J. and Tauber, C. A.. 1972 a. Geographic variation in critical photoperiod and in diapause intensity of Chrysopa carnea (Neuroptera). J. Insect Physiol. 18: 25–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauber, M. J. and Tauber, C. A.. 1972 b. Larval diapause in Chrysopa nigricornis: Sensitive stages, critical photoperiod, and termination (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Ent. exp. appl. 15: 105–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauber, M. J. and Tauber, C. A.. 1973 a. Seasonal regulation of dormancy in Chrysopa carnea (Neuroptera). J. Insect Physiol. 19: 1455–1463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauber, M. J. and Tauber, C. A.. 1973 b. Quantitative response to daylength during diapause in insects. Nature, Lond. 244: 296–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauber, M. J. and Tauber, C. A.. 1973 c. Insect phenology: Criteria for analyzing dormancy and for forecasting postdiapause development and reproduction in the field. Search 3: 1–16. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
Tauber, M. J., Tauber, C. A., and Denys, C. J.. 1970 a. Adult diapause in Chrysopa carnea: photoperiodic control of duration and colour. J. Insect Physiol. 16: 949–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauber, M. J., Tauber, C. A., and Denys, C. J.. 1970 b. Diapause in Chrysopa carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). II. Maintenance by photoperiod. Can. Ent. 102: 474–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Throne, A. L. 1971. The Neuroptera — suborder Planipennia of Wisconsin. I. Introduction and Chrysopidae. Mich. Ent. 4: 65–78.Google Scholar
de Wilde, J., Duintjer, C. S., and Mook, L.. 1959. Physiology of diapause in the adult Colorado beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say). I. The photoperiod as a controlling factor. J. Insect Physiol. 3: 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeleny, J. 1965. Lace-wings (Neuroptera) in cultural steppe and the population dynamics in the species Chrysopa carnea Steph. and Chrysopa phyllochroma Wesm. Acta ent. bohemoslov 62: 177–194.Google Scholar