Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:21:56.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

TAXONOMY, VARIATION, AND ZOOGEOGRAPHY OF TENTHREDO MAXIMA (NORTON) (HYMENOPTERA: TENTHREDINIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Henri Goulet
Affiliation:
Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6
Louise Dumouchel
Affiliation:
Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6

Abstract

Tenthredo retura Ross is here placed in synonymy under T. maxima (Norton) as the subspecies T. maxima retura Ross (syn.nov., stat.nov.). The range of T. maxima is associated with montane meadows or semi-open forest habitats in the montane zone of the Rockies, the Cascades, and the Sierra Nevada. Following the analysis of 24 characters from 2405 specimens, we recognized 12 geographically distinct populations, clustered into two subspecies, T. m. maxima and T. m. retura. Originally included in the originalis group of the genus Tenthredo, T. maxima is characterized as a group of its own with no close relatives in North America. We describe the species and its subspecies, give their distribution, discuss their geographical variation, and attempt to reconstruct their zoogeographical history during the Pleistocene.

Résumé

Tenthredo retura Ross est placé ici dans la sous-espèce T. maxima retura (syn.nov., stat.nov.) en tant que synonyme de T. maxima (Norton). La distribution de l’espèce s’étend le long des zones montagneuses des Rocheuses, des Cascades et de la Sierra Nevada, dans les prés ou dans les éclaircis des habitats forestiers. Suite à l’analyse de 24 caractères chez 2405 spécimens, nous reconnaissons 12 populations distinctes rassemblées en deux sous-espèces, T. m. maxima et T. m. retura. L’espèce T. maxima faisait originalement partie du groupe originalis du genre Tenthredo. Nous la caractérisons désormais dans un groupe à part, qui ne possède aucun proche parent en Amérique du Nord. Dans ce travail, nous décrivons l’espèce et les sous-espèces ainsi que leur distribution, nous discutons de la variation géographique, et tentons de reconstruire l’histoire zoogéographique du groupe durant le Pléistocène.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arnett, R.H., Samuelson, G.A., and Nishida, G.M.. 1993. The Insect and Spider Collections of the World. Flora and Fauna Handbook No. 11. Sandhill Crane Press, Gainesville, FL. 5 + 309 pp.Google Scholar
Barry, R.G. 1983. Late-Pleistocene Climatology. pp. 390–407 in Porter, S.C. (Ed.), Late Quaternary Environments of the United States. Vol. 1. The Late Pleistocene. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN. 407 pp.Google Scholar
Cresson, E.T. 1880. Description of a new North American Hymenoptera in the collection of the American Entomological Society. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 8: 168.Google Scholar
Dalla Torre, C.G. de. 1894. Catalogus Hymenopterorum. Vol. I: Tenthredinidae incl. Uroceridae (Phyllophaga & Xylophaga). Sumptibus Guilelmi Engelmann, Lipsiae. 459 pp.Google Scholar
Heuser, C.J. 1983. Vegetational history of the northwestern United States including Alaska. pp. 239–254 in Porter, S.C. (Ed.), Late Quaternary Environments of the United States. Vol. 1. The Late Pleistocene. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN. 407 pp.Google Scholar
Lundelius, E.L. 1983. Terrestrial Vertebrate Faunas. pp. 311–353 in Porter, S.C. (Ed.), Late Quaternary Environments of the United States. Vol. 1. The Late Pleistocene. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN. 407 pp.Google Scholar
Mani, M.S., and Giddings, L.E.. 1980. Ecology of Highlands. In Illies, J. (Ed.), Monographiae Biologicae. W. Junk, The Hague, Boston, London. Vol. 40: 12 + 249 pp.Google Scholar
Matthews, J.V. 1979. 2. Tertiary and quaternary environments: Historical background for an analysis of the Canadian insect fauna. pp. 31–86 in Danks, H.V. (Ed.), Canada and its Insect Fauna. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 108: 573 pp.Google Scholar
Norton, E. 1864. Notes on Tenthredinidae with descriptions of new species in the collection of the entomological society. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Philadelphia 3: 516.Google Scholar
Norton, E. 1867. Catalogue of the described Tenthredinidae and Uroceridae of North America. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 1: 31–84, 193280.Google Scholar
Ross, H.H. 1951. Suborder Symphyta (=Chalastogastra). pp. 4–89 in Muesebeck, C.F.W., Krombein, K.V., and Townes, H.K. (Eds.), Hymenoptera of America North of Mexico. Synoptic Catalog. United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Monograph 2: 1420 pp.Google Scholar
Smith, D.R. 1979. Suborder Symphyta. pp. 3–137 in Krombein, K.V., Hurd, P.D. Jr., Smith, D.R., and Burks, B.D. (Eds.), Catalog of Hymenoptera North of Mexico. Vol. I. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. 16 + 1198 pp.Google Scholar
Spaulding, W.G., Leopold, E.B., and Van Devender, T.R.. 1983. Late Wisconsin Paleoecology of the American Southwest. pp. 259–393 in Porter, S.C. (Ed.), Late Quaternary Environments of the United States. Vol. 1. The Late Pleistocene. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN. 407 pp.Google Scholar