Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T18:59:31.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TAXONOMY OF THE NEARCTIC SPECIES OF TWINNIA AND GYMNOPAIS (DIPTERA: SIMULIIDAE) AND A DISCUSSION OF THE ANCESTRY OF THE SIMULIIDAE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D. M. Wood
D. M. Wood
Affiliation:
Biosystematics Research Institute, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa K1A 0C6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three species of Twinnia, including hirticornis n. sp., and five species of Gymnopais, including dichopticoides n. sp., holopticoides n. sp., and fimbriatus n. sp., are described, keyed, and illustrated. The ancestral simuliid is portrayed as possessing cephalic fans, because several related nematocerous families, viz., the Ptychopteridae, Dixidae, and Culicidae, also have similar and presumably homologous structures in the larval stage which are used in the same fashion to ingest food particles suspended in water The peculiar Twinnia–Gymnopais larval type, which lacks cephalic fans, is considered to have arisen simply by a neotenic retention of the fanless condition found in the first instar of Prosimulium. Phylogenetically, Twinnia and Gymnopais are therefore considered to have been derived from a Prosimulium-like ancestor. Twinnia is intermediate phylogenetically between Prosimulium and Gymnopais, and the latter is believed to be the most recently derived, possibly as a response to the development of arctic–alpine conditions in Beringia during the Tertiary.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 110 , Issue 12 , December 1978 , pp. 1297 - 1337
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bodrova, J.D. 1975. A new species of black fly (Diptera, Simuliidae) from the Maritime Territory [in Russian, with English summary]). Ent. Obozr. 54: 429–431.Google Scholar
Craig, D.A. 1974. The labrum and cephalic fans of larval Simuliidae (Diptera: Nematocera). Can. J. Zool. 52: 133–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, D.A. 1975. The larvae of Tahitian Simuliidae (Diptera: Nematocera). J. med. Ent. 12: 463–476.Google Scholar
Craig, D.A. 1977. Mouthparts and feeding behaviour of Tahitian larval Simuliidae (Diptera: Nematocera). Quaest. ent. 13: 195–218.Google Scholar
Crosskey, R.W. 1969. A re-classification of the Simuliidae (Diptera) of Africa and its islands. Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. Suppl. 14. 195 pp. + 1 pl.Google Scholar
Davies, L. 1960. The first-instar larva of a species of Prosimulium (Diptera: Simuliidae). Can. Ent. 92: 81–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, L. 1965 a. The structure of certain atypical Simuliidae (Diptera) in relation to evolution within the family, and the erection of a new genus for the Crozet Island black-fly. Proc. Linn. Soc. Lond. 176: 159–180.Google Scholar
Davies, L. 1965 b. On spermatophores in Simuliidae. Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 40: 30–34.Google Scholar
Davies, D.M., Peterson, B. V., and Wood, D.M.. 1962. The black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae) of Ontario. Part I. Adult identification and distribution with descriptions of six new species. Proc. ent. Soc. Ont. (1961) 92: 69–154.Google Scholar
Dumbleton, L.J. 1962. Aberrant head-structure in larval Simuliidae (Diptera). Pacific Insects 4: 77–86.Google Scholar
Dyar, H.G. and Shannon, R.C.. 1927. The North American two-winged flies of the family Simuliidae. Proc. U.S. natl Mus. 69(10): 1–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grenier, P. and Rageau, J.. 1960. Simulies (Dipt., Simuliidae) de Tahiti. Remarques sur la classification des Simuliidae. Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 53: 727–742.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1950. Phylogenetic Systematics. Translated by Davis, D.D., and Zangerl, R.. Univ. Illinois Press, Urbana, 1966. 263 pp.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1973. Diptera (Zweiflügler). In Handbuch der Zoologie. 2. Aufl., Bd. 4, Hfte 2, T. 2/31 Lfg. 20. 337 pp.Google Scholar
Malloch, J.R. 1917. A preliminary classification of Diptera, exclusive of Pupipara, based upon larval and pupal characters, with keys to imagines in certain families. Part I. Bull. Illinois St. Labor. nat. Hist. (Urbana) 12(3). 409 pp., 57 pl.Google Scholar
Nielsen, E.T. 1959. Copulation in Glyptotendipes (Phytotendipes) paripes Edwards. Nature, Lond. 184: 1252–1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, B.V. 1970. The Prosimulium of Canada and Alaska (Diptera: Simuliidae). Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 69. 216 pp.Google Scholar
Pomerantzev, B.I. 1932. Beiträge zur Morphologie und Anatomie der Genitalien von Culicoides [in Russian, with German summary]. Mag. Parasit. (Leningrad) 3: 183–214.Google Scholar
Puri, I.M. 1925. On the life history and structure of the early stages of Simuliidae (Diptera: Nematocera.) Parasitology 17: 295–369.Google Scholar
Rothfels, K. and Freeman, M.. 1966. The salivary gland chromosomes of three North American species of Twinnia (Diptera: Simuliidae). Can. J. Zool. 44: 937–945.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubtzov, I.A. 1955. Unusual new black-fly species from eastern Siberia [in Russian]. Ént. Obozr. 34: 323–339.Google Scholar
Rubtzov, I.A. 1956. Fauna of the U.S.S.R., family Simuliidae [in Russian]. 6(6). 859 pp.Google Scholar
Rubtzov, I.A. 1963. Eine neue Art aus der Unterfamilie Gymnopaidinae (Simuliidae, Dipt.). Stuttg. Beitr. Naturk. 123: 1–7.Google Scholar
Schremmer, F. 1949. Morphologische und funktionelle Analyse der Mundteile und des Pharynx der Larva von Anopheles maculipennis Meig. Osterr. Zool. Zeit. 2(2): 173–222.Google Scholar
Schremmer, F. 1950. Bau und Funktion der Larvenmundteile der Dipterengattung Dixa Meigen. Osterr. Zool. Zeit. 2(4): 379–413.Google Scholar
Shewell, G.E. 1958. Classification and distribution of arctic and subarctic Simuliidae. Proc. 10th int. Congr. Ent. (1956) 1: 635–643.Google Scholar
Shewell, G.E. 1959. New Canadian black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae). III. Can. Ent. 91: 686–697.Google Scholar
Sommerman, K. M., Sailer, R.I., and Esselbaugh, C.O.. 1955. Biology of Alaskan black flies (Simuliidae, Diptera). Ecol. Monogr. 25: 345–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, A. 1949. A new genus of Simuliidae from Alaska (Diptera). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 51: 260–267.Google Scholar
Stone, A. 1965. Family Simuliidae. In Stone, A. et al., A catalog of the Diptera of America north of Mexico. Agriculture Handb. 276. 1696 pp.Google Scholar
Stone, A. and Jamnback, H.A.. 1955. The black flies of New York State (Diptera: Simuliidae). Bull. N.Y. St. Mus. 349. 144 pp.Google Scholar
Wensler, R.J.D. and Rempel, J.G.. 1962. The morphology of the male and female reproductive systems of the midge, Chironomus plumosus L. Can. J. Zool. 40: 199–229.Google Scholar