Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:08:54.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SYNTHETIC PHEROMONES DISRUPT MALE DIORYCTRIA SPP. MOTHS IN A LOBLOLLY PINE SEED ORCHARD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Gary L. DeBarr ,
James L. Hanula ,
Christine G. Niwa  and
John C. Nord
Gary L. DeBarr
Affiliation:
Southern Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, USDA Forest Service, 320 Green Street, Athens, Georgia, USA 30602-2044
James L. Hanula*
Affiliation:
Southern Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, USDA Forest Service, 320 Green Street, Athens, Georgia, USA 30602-2044
Christine G. Niwa
Affiliation:
Forestry Services Laboratory, USDA Forest Service, 3200 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, Oregon, USA 97331
John C. Nord
Affiliation:
Southern Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, USDA Forest Service, 320 Green Street, Athens, Georgia, USA 30602-2044
*
1 Author to whom all corresponding should be addressed (E-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Synthetic sex pheromones released in a loblolly pine, Pinus taeda L. (Pinaceae), seed orchard interfered with the ability of male coneworm moths, Dioryctria Zeller spp. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), to locate traps baited with sex pheromones or live females. Pherocon 1C® traps baited with synthetic pheromones or live conspecific females were hung near the center of two 1.2-ha circular plots during emergence of Dioryctria amatella (Hulst), Dioryctria disclusa (Heinrich), and Dioryctria merkeli (Mutuura and Munroe). In a paired design, trap catches for the mating-disruption treatment with synthetic pheromone dispensers consisting of three polyvinyl chloride rods placed in every tree were compared with the control treatment. Treatments were alternated at intervals of 2–3 d. Trap catches of D. amatella were reduced by 91% when plots were treated with 2.5 g/ha of Z-11-hexadencenyl acetate. Catches were reduced by 99.5% for D. disclusa and by 97% for D. merkeli when plots were treated with 12.5 g/ha of Z-9-tetradecenyl acetate, whereas catches of D. amatella were unaffected by this mating-disruption treatment. Daily disappearance of Z-9-tetradecenyl acetate from the dispensers averaged 0.46 g/ha or less. Manually placing dispensers on nylon lines in the tops of trees was an effective method for releasing synthetic Dioryctria pheromones in the orchard. These data suggest it may be feasible to prevent mating of Dioryctria spp. in pine seed orchards by using synthetic pheromones for mating disruption, but large-scale tests will be required to demonstrate cone protection.

Résumé

La libération de phéromones sexuelles synthétiques dans une plantation à semence de pins taeda, Pinus taeda L. (Pinaceae), entrave la capacité des mâles de Dioryctria Zeller spp. (Lepidoptera : Pyralidae) de localiser des pièges garnis de phéromones sexuelles ou de femelles vivantes. Des pièges Pherocon 1C® garnis de phéromones synthétiques ou de femelles vivantes conspécifiques ont été suspendus près du centre de deux enceintes circulaires de 1,2 ha pendant l’émergence de Dioryctria amatella (Hulst), Dioryctria disclusa (Heinrich) et Dioryctria merkeli (Mutuura et Munroe). Dans un montage pair, des pièges conçus pour perturber les accouplements ont été munis d’appareils dispensateurs de phéromone synthétique constitués de trois bâtonnets de chlorure de polyvinyl et placés dans chaque arbre pour fins de comparaison avec les témoins. Les traitements ont été administrés en alternance à intervalles de 2–3 jours. Les captures de D. amatella ont été réduites de 91% après administration de 2,5 g/ha d’acétate de Z-11-hexadécényle. Les captures de D. disclusa ont été réduites de 99,5% et celles de D. merkeli de 97% après traitement a 2,5 g/ha d’acétate de Z-9-décényle, enfin les captures de D. amatella sont demeurées inchangées après le traitement perturbateur des accouplements. La diminution d’acétate de Z-9-décényle dans les dispensateurs était en moyenne de 0,46 g/ha par jour ou moins. L’installation manuelle de dispensateurs le long de fils de nylon à la cime des arbres s’est avérée une méthode efficace de diffusion des phéromones synthétiques de Dioryctria spp. dans la plantation. Ces résultats indiquent qu’il est possible de perturber la reproduction de Dioryctria spp. dans les plantations de pins à semence en utilisant des phéromones synthétiques capables d’empêcher les accouplements, mais il faudra procéder à des tests sur une grande échelle pour démontrer que ce traitement protège les cônes.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 132 , Issue 3 , June 2000 , pp. 345 - 351
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cameron, R.S. 1981. Toward insect pest management in southern pine seed orchards with emphasis on the biology of Tetyra bipuctata (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) and the pheromone of Dioryctria clarioralis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Texas Forest Service Publication 126Google Scholar
Daterman, G.E. 1974. Synthetic sex pheromone for detection survey of European pine shoot moth. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service Research Paper PNW-180Google Scholar
Daterman, G.E., Sartwell, C., Sower, L.L. 1980. Prospects for controlling forest Lepidoptera with controlled release pheromone formulations. pp. 213–26 in Baker, R.W. (Ed.), Controlled release of bioactive materials. New York: Academic PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeBarr, G.L., Berisford, C.W. 1981. Attraction of webbing coneworm males to female sex pheromone. Environmental Entomology 10: 119–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeBarr, G.L., Barber, L.R., Berisford, C.W., Weatherby, J.C. 1982. Pheromone traps detect webbing coneworms in loblolly pine seed orchards. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 6: 122–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebel, B.H., Flavell, T.H., Drake, L.E., Yates, H.O. III, DeBarr, G.L. 1980. Seed and cone insects of southern pines. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service General Technical Report SE-8Google Scholar
Fedde, V. 1982. Rearing the southern pine coneworm, Dioryctria amatella (Hulst), on artificial diet. Journal of the Georgia Entomological Society 17: 237–40Google Scholar
Grant, G.G., Prevost, Y.H., Slessor, K.N., King, G.G.S., West, R.J. 1987. Identification of the sex pheromone of the spruce coneworm, Dioryctria reniculelloides (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Environmental Entomology 16: 905–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanula, J.L., Berisford, C.W., DeBarr, G.L. 1984 a. Pheromone cross-attraction and inhibition among four coneworms, Dioryctria spp. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), in a loblolly pine seed orchard. Environmental Entomology 13: 1298–1301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanula, J.L., DeBarr, G.L., Harris, W.M., Berisford, C.W. 1984 b. Factors affecting catches of male coneworms, Dioryctria spp. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), in pheromone traps in southern pine seed orchards. Journal of Economic Entomology 77: 1449–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedlin, A.F., Yates, H.O. III, Tovar, D.C., Ebel, B.H., Koerber, T.W., Merkel, E.P. 1980. Cone and seed insects of North American conifers. Canadian Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, and Secretar'ia de Agricultura y Recursos, Hidra'ulicos, Mexico.Google Scholar
Hendricks, D.E., Perez, C.T., Guerra, R.J. 1982. Disruption of Heliothis spp. mating with chemical sex attractant components. Environmental Entomology 11: 859–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, W.L., DeBarr, G.L., Berisford, C.W., Barber, L.R., Roelofs, W.L. 1982. Identification of the sex pheromone of the webbing coneworm moth, Dioryctria disclusa. Environmental Entomology 11: 986–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, W.L., Cameron, R.S., Tamhankar, A., DeBarr, G.L., Berisford, C.W., Roelofs, W.L. 1984. Sex pheromone of the blister coneworm moth, Dioryctria clarioralis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Environmental Entomology 13: 854–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, W.L., DeBarr, G.L., Hanula, J.L., Kovalev, B., Cameron, R.S., Berisford, C.W., Roelofs, W.L. 1986. Z-11 hexadecenyl acetate, a sex pheromone for the southern pine coneworm, Dioryctria amatella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Environmental Entomology 15: 316–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niwa, C.G., Daterman, G.E., Sartwell, C., Sower, L.L. 1988. Control of Rhyacionia zozanna (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) by mating disruption with synthetic sex pheromone. Environmental Entomology 17: 593–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overhulser, D.L., Daterman, G.E., Sower, L.L., Sartwell, C., Koerber, T.W. 1980. Mating disruption with synthetic sex attractants controls damage by Eucosma sonomana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Pinus ponderosa plantations. II. Aerially applied hollow fiber formulation. The Canadian Entomologist 112: 163–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roelofs, W.L., Novak, M.A. 1981. Small-plot disorientation tests for screening potential mating disruptants. pp. 229–42 in Mitchell, E.R. (Ed.), Management of insect pests with semiochemicals. New York: PlenumCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartwell, C., Daterman, G.E., Sower, L.L., Overhulser, D.L., Koerber, T.W. 1980. Mating disruption with synthetic sex attractants controls damage by Eucosma sonomana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Olethreutinae) in Pinus ponderosa plantations. I. Manually applied polyvinyl chloride formulations. The Canadian Entomologist 112: 159–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 1990. SAS/STAT® user's guide, version 6. 4th ed. Cary: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Schneider, J.C. 1989. Role of movement in evaluation of area-wide insect pest management tactics. Environmental Entomology 18: 868–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weatherby, J.C., DeBarr, G.L., Barber, L.R. 1985. Monitoring coneworms with pheromone traps: a valuable pest detection procedure for use in southern pine seed orchards. pp. 208–20 in Proceedings of the 18th Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference, Long Beach, Mississippi.Google Scholar