Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:46:59.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SURVIVAL MODELS FOR WITHIN-TREE POPULATIONS OF DENDROCTONUS FRONTALIS (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Robert N. Coulson ,
P. E. Pulley ,
J. L. Foltz ,
W. C. Martin  and
C. L. Kelley
Robert N. Coulson
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University, College Station
P. E. Pulley
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University, College Station
J. L. Foltz
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University, College Station
W. C. Martin
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University, College Station
C. L. Kelley
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University, College Station
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Within-tree models of Dendroctonus frontalis generation survival from attacking adults to emerging adults and survivorship from eggs to emergence were developed for five regions of the infested tree bole of Pinus taeda L. The generation survival model (GS) describes the number of D. frontalis/attacking adult as a function of time at a specific height. The form of the model is

YGS = 1.0 + C(1–e–20.0X)eA(1.0–X)B + ɛ.

The survival model (S) describes the number of D. frontalis/100 eggs as a function of time at a specific height. The form of this model is

YS = CeA(1.0–X)B + ɛ.

The generation survival model indicated that the rate of survival was primarily a function of generation development time, rather than position on the infested tree bole. The rates also varied in different sections of the tree depending on the initial egg/attacking adult population of D. frontalis. The emergence/attack ratios for the tree sections were slightly greater at the top and bottom than in the middle of the infested bole.

The survivorship curves, based on an initial cohort of 100 eggs, were similar for the various sections of the tree bole. Again, the rate of population change was primarily a function of developmental time, rather than position on the tree. The curves for the various tree sections were essentially the same.

The combined action of the various biotic and abiotic mortality agents acting in the different sections of the tree resulted in essentially uniform survivorship throughout the infested portion of the tree bole.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 109 , Issue 8 , August 1977 , pp. 1071 - 1077
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beaver, R. A. 1966. The development and expression of population tables of the bark beetle Scolytus scolytus (F.). J. Animal Ecol. 35: 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berisford, C. W., Kulman, H. M., Peinkowski, R. L., and Heikkenen, H. J.. 1971. Factors affecting the distribution and abundance of hymenopterous parasites of Ips spp. bark beetles in Virginia (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 103: 235–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berryman, A. A. 1968. Development of sampling techniques and life tables for the fir engraver Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 100: 1138–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camors, F. B. Jr., and Payne, T. L.. 1973. Sequence of arrival of entomophagous insects to trees infested with the southern pine beetle. Environ. Ent. 2: 267–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulson, R. N., Hain, F. P., Foltz, J. L., and Mayyasi, A. M.. 1975. Techniques for sampling the dynamics of southern pine beetle populations. Misc. Publ. Texas agric. Exp. Stn. 1185. 18 pp.Google Scholar
Coulson, R. N., Mayyasi, A. M., Foltz, J. L., and Pulley, P. E.. 1976 a. Production flow system evaluation of within-tree populations of Dendroctonus frontalis. Environ. Ent. 5: 375–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulson, R. N., Mayyasi, A. M., Foltz, J. L., Hain, F. P., and Martin, W. C.. 1976 b. Resource utilization by the southern pine beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis. Can. Ent. 108: 353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deevey, E. S. Jr., 1947. Life tables for natural populations of animals. Q. Rev. Biol. 22: 283–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeMars, C. J., Dahlsten, D. L., and Stark, R. W.. 1970. Survivorship curves for eight generations of western pine beetle in California, 1962–65. In Stark, R. W. and Dahlsten, D. L. (Eds.), Studies on the population dynamics of the western pine beetle, Dendroctonus brevicomis Le Conte (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Univ. of California, Division of Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
Foltz, J. L., Mayyasi, A. M., Hain, F. P., Coulson, R. N., and Martin, W. C.. 1976. Egg-gallery length relationship and within-tree analyses for the southern pine beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 108: 341–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, F. B. 1959. Partial life tables for the Black Hills beetle. J. econ. Ent. 52: 1199–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, C. L. 1966. The influence of nematode parasites and associates on bark beetles in the United States. Bull. ent. Soc. Am. 12: 384–386.Google Scholar
Mayyasi, A. M., Coulson, R. N., Foltz, J. L., Hain, F. P., and Martin, W. C.. 1976. Functional description of within-tree larval and progeny adult populations of Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 108: 363–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1971. Mortality factors caused by pathogenic bacteria and fungi of the southern pine beetle in North Carolina. J. invert. Path. 17: 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1972. Southern pine beetle mortality in North Carolina caused by parasites and predators. Environ. Ent. 1: 58–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, J. C., Thatcher, R. C., and Pickard, L. S.. 1971. Relative abundance of southern pine beetle associates in East Texas. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 64: 72–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, J. C. and Roton, L. M.. 1971. Mites associated with southern pine beetles in Allen Parish, Louisiana. Can. Ent. 103: 1775–1798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overgaard, N. A. 1968. Insects associated with the southern pine beetle in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi. J. econ. Ent. 61: 1197–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulley, P. E., Foltz, J. L., Mayyasi, A. M., and Coulson, R. N.. 1976. Topological mapping to estimate number of bark-inhabiting insects. Environ. Ent. 5: 640–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobodkin, L. B. 1961. Growth and regulation of animal populations. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York. 134 pp.Google Scholar
Stephen, F. M. and Dahlsten, D. L.. 1976 a. The temporal and spatial arrival pattern of Dendroctonus brevicomis in Ponderosa pine. Can. Ent. 108: 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, F. M. and Dahlsten, D. L.. 1976 b. The arrival sequence of the arthropod complex following attack by Dendroctonus brevicomis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in Ponderosa pine. Can. Ent. 108: 283–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar