Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:28:18.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Survival and Reproduction of Nasonia vitripennis (Walk.) at Different Host Population Densities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

H. G. Wylie
H. G. Wylie
Affiliation:
Research Institute, Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture, Belleville, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Females of Nasonia vitripennis (Walk.) lived longer, found more hosts, and produced more progeny at high host (housefly, Musca domestica L.) population densities than at lower ones. Because they feed on the fly pupae that they parasitize, the female parasites were able to obtain more food at high host population densities. Starved and unstarved females produced progeny with similar sex ratios. By feeding on parasitized fly pupae when unparasitized ones are scarce, females of N. vitripennis increase their longevity and their ability to oviposit if they subsequently find unparasitized hosts. Females that have fed partly or entirely on parasitized pupae subsequently produce relatively more diapause progeny.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 98 , Issue 3 , March 1966 , pp. 275 - 281
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burnett, T. 1951. Effects of temperature and host density on the rate of increase of an insect parasite. Amer. Nat. 85: 337–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, T. 1958. Effect of host distribution on the reproduction of Encarsia formosa Gahan (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Canad. Ent. 90: 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bach, P., and Smith, H. S.. 1941. The effect of host density on the rate of reproduction of entomophagous parasites. J. econ. Ent. 34: 741–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, R. L. 1954. The effect of diet on egg maturation and resorption in Mormoniella vitripennis (Hymenoptera, Pteromalidae). Quart. J. micr. Sci. 95: 459–468.Google Scholar
Flanders, S. E. 1935. Effect of host density on parasitism. J. econ. Ent. 28: 898–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, P. E. 1962. The effect of resorbing eggs upon the sex ratio of the offspring in Nasonia vitripennis (Hymenoptera, Pteromalidae). J. exp. Biol. 39: 161–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, D. S. 1962. The effect of the age of female Nasonia vitripennis (Walker) (Hymenoptera, Pteromalidae) upon the incidence of larval diapause. J. Insect Physiol. 8: 309–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullyett, G. C. 1949a. Distribution of progeny by Chelonus texanus Cress. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Canad. Ent. 81: 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullyett, G. C. 1949a. Distribution of progeny by Cryptus inornatus Pratt (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Canad. Ent. 81: 285–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wylie, H. G. 1949a. Discrimination between parasitized and unparasitized house fly pupae by females of Nasonia vitripennis (Walk.) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Canad. Ent. 97: 279–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wylie, H. G. 1949a. Effects of superparasitism on Nasonia vitripennis (Walk.) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Canad. Ent. 97: 326–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wylie, H. G. 1949a. Some factors that reduce the reproductive rate of Nasonia vitripennis (Walk.) at high adult population densities. Canad. Ent. 97: 970–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar