Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:40:55.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Survival and Development of the Bronze Poplar Borer Agrilus liragus Barter & Brown (Coleoptera: Buprestidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

G. W. Barter
G. W. Barter
Affiliation:
Department of Forestry of Canada, Regional Laboratory, Fredericton, New Brunswick
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Survival of Agrilus liragus B. & B. is highly dependent on host condition. Any weakening factor such as defoliation, mechanical injury, or previous damage by A. liragus increases tree susceptibility to attack and enhances borer survival. The insect itself, through its local weakening effect on the phloem and cambial tissues, controls to some extent its own feeding environment. Although parasitism and predation do take place, the condition of the host tree is considered the prime factor determining the density of the borer population.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 97 , Issue 10 , October 1965 , pp. 1063 - 1068
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R. F. 1944. The relation between host condition and attacks by the bronzed birch borer. J. econ. Ent. 37: 588–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barter, G. W. 1957. Studies of the bronze birch borer, Agrilus anxius Gory, in New Brunswick. Canad. Ent. 89: 12–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barter, G. W., and Brown, W. J.. 1949. On the identity of Agrilus anxius Gory and some allied species (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Canad. Ent. 81: 245–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barter, G. W., and Cameron, D. G.. 1955. Some effects of defoliation by the forest tent caterpillar. Can. Dep. Agric., Sci. Serv., For. Biol. Div., Bi-Mon. Prog. Rept. 11(6): 1.Google Scholar
Bier, J. E. 1940. Studies in forest pathology. III. Hypoxylon canker of poplar. Can. Dep. Agric., Div. Bot. and Plant Path., Tech. Bull. 27. 40 pp.Google Scholar
Bier, J. E. 1961. The relation of bark moisture to the development of canker diseases caused by native, facultative parasites. VI. Pathogenicity studies of Hypoxylon pruinatum (Klotzche) Cke., and Septoria musiva Pk. on species of Acer, Populus, and Salix. Canad. J. Bot. 39: 1555–1561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, S. A., and Harrison, R. P.. 1954. Insect attacks and hypoxylon infections in aspen. J. For. 52: 741–743.Google Scholar
Graham, S. A., Harrison, R. P. Jr., and Westell, C. E. Jr., 1963. Aspens: Phoenix trees of the Great Lakes region. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, U.S.A.272 pp.Google Scholar
Gruenhagen, R. H. 1945. Hypoxylon pruinatum and its pathogenesis on poplar. Phytopathology 35: 72–89.Google Scholar
Heering, H. 1956. Zur biologie, Ökologie und zum massenweschel des Buchenpraitkäfers (Agrilus viridus L.). Z. angew. Ent. 38: 250–287; 39: 76–114. (English summary.)Google Scholar
Nash, R. W., Duda, E. J. and Gray, N. H.. 1951. Studies on extensive dying, regeneration, and management of birch. Maine For. Serv. Bull. 15. 82 pp.Google Scholar
Rose, A. H. 1958. The effect of defoliation on foliage production and radial growth of quaking aspen. For. Sci. 4: 335–342.Google Scholar