Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:15:26.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Suitability of felt traps to monitor oviposition by cabbage maggot (Diptera: Anthomyiidae)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

P.L. Dixon ,
R.J. West ,
K.B. McRae  and
D. Spaner
P.L. Dixon*
Affiliation:
Atlantic Cool Climate Crop Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, PO Box 39088, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada A1E 5Y7
R.J. West
Affiliation:
Atlantic Cool Climate Crop Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, PO Box 39088, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada A1E 5Y7
K.B. McRae
Affiliation:
Atlantic Cool Climate Crop Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, PO Box 39088, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada A1E 5Y7
D. Spaner
Affiliation:
Atlantic Cool Climate Crop Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, PO Box 39088, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada A1E 5Y7
*
2Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effectiveness of felt egg traps to detect oviposition by the cabbage maggot, Delia radicum (L.), was studied under field conditions for cabbage, Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata L. (Brassicaceae), and rutabaga, Brassica napus L. var. napobrassica (L.) Reichenb. (Brassicaceae), in 1994 and 1995. The numbers of eggs laid on traps were compared with the numbers deposited in the soil next to the plant. Also, the incidence of oviposition (i.e., the percentage of samples with eggs) on soil and traps was compared. A total of 5160 eggs was collected from 5208 samples, but just 16% of all samples had eggs. For cabbage, early in the 1994 season, the incidence of oviposition in soil samples was double that on traps, and the number of eggs per sample was greater also. Oviposition incidence and the number of eggs per sample during the rest of the summer were similar. In the 1995 cabbage trial, the incidence of oviposition early in the season was again higher in soil samples than on traps, and there were fewer eggs per trap than per soil sample. For rutabaga, the number of eggs was similar using both methods early in the second generation, but from mid-August there were more eggs per trap than per soil sample. The incidence of oviposition in the rutabaga trial was similar on traps and in soil through most of the experiment. In this study, felt traps did not adequately detect the timing of cabbage maggot oviposition in the critical early season.

Résumé

De 1994 à 1995, nous avons étudié en champ l’efficacité d’un piège à oeufs pour détecter le début de la ponte de la mouche du chou, Delia radicum (L.), sur le chou, Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata L. (Brassicaceae) et sur le rutabaga, Brassica napus L. var. napobrassica (L.) Reichenb. (Brassicaceae). Le nombre d’oeufs déposés sur la piège et dans le sol autour de la plante-hôte, ont été comparés. « L’incidence de la ponte », définie comme le pourcentage des échantillons avec des oeufs, sur le piège et dans le sol, ont aussi été comparés. Un total de 5160 oeufs ont été recueillis sur l’ensemble des 5208 échantillons. Seize pourcent des échantillons contenaient des oeufs. Pour le chou, l’incidence de la ponte et le nombre moyen d’oeufs en début de saison 1994 étaient beaucoup plus élevés dans le sol que sur la piège, alors que pour le reste de l’été ils étaient similaires. Dans l’essai du chou de 1995, l’incidence de la ponte en début de saison était beaucoup plus élevée dans le sol que dans les pièges, et le nombre d’oeufs retrouvés sur chaque piège, était moins élevé que dans le sol. Pour le rutabaga, les nombres d’oeufs recueillis en début de saison par nos deux méthodes étaient similaires. Cependant, à la mi-août, on a observé un plus grand nombre d’oeufs sur les pièges que dans les échantillons de sol. Dans cette étude, le piège à oeufs n’a pas permis de détecter le début de la ponte de la mouche du chou à la période critique du début de la saison.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 134 , Issue 2 , April 2002 , pp. 205 - 214
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Contribution No. 127 of the Atlantic Cool Climate Crop Research Centre.

References

Bligaard, J., Meadow, R., Nielson, O., Percy-Smith, A. 1999. Evaluation of felt traps to estimate egg numbers of cabbage root fly, Delia radicum, and turnip root fly, Delia floralis in commercial crops. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 90: 141–8Google Scholar
Bromand, B. 1988. Three years experience of using a warning system to predict the times of attack by the cabbage root fly (Delia radicum). International Organization for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious Animals and Plants/West Palearctic Regional Section Bulletin 11: 77–88Google Scholar
Brooks, A.R. 1951. Identification of root maggots (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) attacking cruciferous garden crops in Canada, with notes on biology and control. The Canadian Entomologist 83: 109–20Google Scholar
Coady, J.R. 1999. Undersowing rutabaga (Brassica napus L.) with white clover (Trifolium repens L.): effects on the cabbage root maggot (Delia radicum (L.)) and its parasitoid/predator (Aleochara bilineata Gyll.). MSc thesis, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John'sGoogle Scholar
Coady, J.R., Dixon, P.L. 1997. The cabbage maggot in Newfoundland and Labrador. Publication of the Atlantic Cool Climate Crop Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, St. John'sGoogle Scholar
Collier, R.H., Finch, S. 1988. Thermal requirements for cabbage root fly, Delia radicum, development. pp 21–5 in Cavalloro, R., Pelerents, C. (Eds), Progress on pest management in field vegetables. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: A.A.Balkema PublishersGoogle Scholar
Eckenrode, C.J., Chapman, R.K. 1972. Seasonal adult cabbage maggot populations in the field in relation to thermal unit accumulations. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 65: 151–6Google Scholar
Ellis, P.R., Hardman, J.A., Crisp, P., Johnson, A.G. 1979. The influence of plant age on resistance of radish to cabbage root fly egg-laying. Annals of Applied Biology 93: 125–31Google Scholar
Finch, S., Collier, R.H. 1986. Forecasting the times of attack of the cabbage root fly (Delia radicum) on vegetable brassica crops. Aspects of Applied Biology 12: 37–46Google Scholar
Finch, S., Elliot, M.S. 1994. Predation of cabbage maggot eggs and larvae by carabid ground beetles—fact or fantasy? International Organization for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious Animals and Plants/West Palearctic Regional Section Bulletin 17: 109–14Google Scholar
Freuler, J. 1988. Efficacy and acceptance of the cabbage root fly egg trap. International Organization for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious Animals and Plants/West Palearctic Regional Section Bulletin 11: 60–7Google Scholar
Freuler, J., Fischer, S. 1982. Description d'un piège à oeufs pour la mouche du chou, Delia radicum Wiedemann. Bulletin de la Societe Entomologique Suisse 55: 77–85Google Scholar
Griffiths, G.C.D. 1991. Flies of the Nearctic region: Anthomyiidae. Volume VIII, Part 2, Number 7. Stuttgart, Germany: E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Humphreys, I.C., Mowat, D.J. 1994. Effects of some organic treatments on predators (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of cabbage root fly, Delia radicum (L.) (Diptera: Anthomyiidae), and on alternative prey species. Pedobiologia 38: 513–8Google Scholar
Kostal, V., Baur, R., Städler, E. 2000. Exploration and assessment of the oviposition substrate by the cabbage root fly, Delia radicum (Diptera: Anthomyiidae). European Journal of Entomology 97: 33–40Google Scholar
McCullagh, P., Nelder, J.A. 1983. Generalized linear models. London: Chapman and HallGoogle Scholar
Meadow, R., Bligaard, J., Shelton, A.M. 1996. Is there an easy method for monitoring root flies in Brassica crops? International Organization for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious Animals and Plants/West Palearctic Regional Section Bulletin 19: 12–7Google Scholar
Morris, R.F. 1959 a. Control of the cabbage root maggot in Newfoundland. Canada Department of Agriculture Research Branch Publication 1045Google Scholar
Morris, R.E. 1959 b. Control of root maggots in Swede turnips in Newfoundland with heptachlor and aldrin and the effect on parasites and overwintering pupae. Journal of Economic Entomology 53: 65–7Google Scholar
Ouden, H den, Theunissen, J. 1988. Preference and non-preference in monitoring the cabbage root fly, Delia radicum / D. brassicae, oviposition by traps. Acta Horticulturae 219: 11–4Google Scholar
Ravn, H.P., Esbjerg, P. 1994. Current status of monitoring populations of Delia radicum, Psila rosae and Agrotis segetum in field vegetables in Denmark. International Organization for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious Animals and Plants/West Palearctic Regional Section Bulletin 17: 51–4Google Scholar
Ritchot, C., Read, D.C., Steiner, M.Y., Harcourt, D.G. 1994. “Cabbage maggot.” pp 115–6 in Howard, R.J., Garland, J.A., Seaman, W.L. (Eds), Diseases and pests of vegetable crops in Canada: an illustrated compendium. Ottawa: The Canadian Phytopathological Society and The Entomological Society of CanadaGoogle Scholar
Roessingh, P., Städler, E., Baur, R., Hurter, J., Ramp, T. 1997. Tarsal chemoreceptors and oviposition behaviour of the cabbage root fly, (Delia radicum) sensitive to fractions and new compounds of host-leaf surface extracts. Physiological Entomology 22: 140–8Google Scholar
Shaw, M.W. 1972. The separation of eggs of Erioschia brassicae and E. floralis in Swede crops. Plant Pathology 21: 10–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traynier, R.M.M. 1967. Stimulation of oviposition by the cabbage root fly, Erioischia brassicae. Entomologia experimentalis et applicata 10: 401–12Google Scholar
van de Steene, F. 1997. Monitoring the attack period of the cabbage root fly, Delia radicum (L.), in brussels sprout crops. Biuletyn Warzywniczy 47: 5–12Google Scholar
Vänninen, I., Hokkanen, H., Tyni-Juslin, J. 1999. Attempts to control cabbage root flies Delia radicum L., and Delia floralis (Fall.) (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) with entomopathogenic fungi: laboratory and greenhouse tests. Journal of Applied Entomology 123: 107–13Google Scholar
Vernon, R.S., Mackenzie, J.R. 1998. The effect of exclusion fences on the colonization of rutabagas by cabbage flies (Diptera: Anthomyiidae). The Canadian Entomologist 130: 153–62Google Scholar
Walgenbach, J.F., Eckenrode, C.J., Straub, R.W. 1993. Emergence patterns of Delia radicum (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) populations from North Carolina and New York. Environmental Entomology 22: 559–66Google Scholar