Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:06:13.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Specific identification of some female Empoascini (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae), using morphological characters of the ovipositor and isozyme and mtCOI sequence analyses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Stefano Demichelis ,
Aulo Manino ,
Chiara Sartor ,
Dina Cifuentes  and
Augusto Patetta
Stefano Demichelis*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Valorizzazione e Protezione delle Risorse Agro-Forestali, Entomologia e Zoologia applicate all'Ambiente “Carlo Vidano,” Università di Torino, via Leonardo da Vinci 44, I-10095 Grugliasco, Torino, Italy
Aulo Manino
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Valorizzazione e Protezione delle Risorse Agro-Forestali, Entomologia e Zoologia applicate all'Ambiente “Carlo Vidano,” Università di Torino, via Leonardo da Vinci 44, I-10095 Grugliasco, Torino, Italy
Chiara Sartor
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Valorizzazione e Protezione delle Risorse Agro-Forestali, Entomologia e Zoologia applicate all'Ambiente “Carlo Vidano,” Università di Torino, via Leonardo da Vinci 44, I-10095 Grugliasco, Torino, Italy
Dina Cifuentes
Affiliation:
Departamento Producción Vegetal, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Agrónomos, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena. Paseo Alfonso XIII, 48, 30203 Cartagena, Spain
Augusto Patetta
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Valorizzazione e Protezione delle Risorse Agro-Forestali, Entomologia e Zoologia applicate all'Ambiente “Carlo Vidano,” Università di Torino, via Leonardo da Vinci 44, I-10095 Grugliasco, Torino, Italy
*
1 Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We identified females of six species of leafhoppers (tribe Empoascini), Asymmetrasca decedens (Paoli), Empoasca affinis Nast, E. decipiens Paoli, E. pteridis (Dahlbom), E. vitis Göthe, and Jacobiasca lybica (Bergevin and Zanon), using morphological characters of the ovipositor and isozyme and mitochondrial COI sequence analyses. Useful traits of the ovipositor are tooth morphology, length of the toothed area, form of sculpturing, and number and position of sensilla on the first and second pair of valves. Among the set of enzyme systems assayed, four putative loci, sod, hk-2, est-3, and est-2, together provided reliable diagnostic characters for single species, pairs of species, and groups of species. Analysis of mtCOI sequences revealed differences between the six species of Empoascini, and the neighbour-joining tree separated them into three distinct groups. Phenetic trees elaborated using Nei’s index and the Kimura two-parameter model clustered the six Empoascini species in similar groups.

Résumé

Nous avons identifié des femelles de six espèces de la tribu Empoascini, Asymmetrasca decedens (Paoli), Empoasca affinis Nast, E. decipiens Paoli, E. pteridis (Dahlbom), E. vitis Göthe et Jacobiasca lybica (Bergevin and Zanon) avec les caractères morphologiques de la tarière, et avec les études des isoenzymes et du gène mtCOI. Pour l'identification, des caractères de la lame antérieure et postérieure de la tarière ont été utilisés, particulièrement la forme des dents, la longueur de l'espace occupé par les dents, la forme de la surface occupée par des sculptures, le nombre et la position des sensilles. Les quatre loci qui peuvent être utilisés ensemble comme caractères diagnostiques sont sod, hk-2, est-3, et est-2. L’analyse des séquençages du gène mtCOI a montré des différences entre le six espèces de la tribu Empoascini, et le dendrogramme neighbour-joining a séparé trois groupes d'espèces. Les dendrogrammes basés sur les distances génétiques de Nei et la matrice de Kimura regroupent les six espèces d'Empoascini de la même façon.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 142 , Issue 6 , December 2010 , pp. 513 - 531
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acquaah, G. 1992. Practical protein electrophoresis for genetic research. Dioscorides Press, Portland, Oregon.Google Scholar
Arocha, Y., Piñol, B., López, M., Miranda, I., Almeida, R., Wilson, M., and Jones, P. 2007. “Bunchy top symptom” of papaya in Cuba: new insights. Bulletin of Insectology, 60: 393–394.Google Scholar
Ayala, F.J. 1983. Enzymes as taxonomic characters. In Protein polymorphism: adaptive and taxonomic significance. Edited by Oxford, G.S. and Rollinson, D., Systematics Association Special Volume No. 24, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Ayala, F.J., Tracey, M.L., Barr, L.G., McDonald, J.F., and Perez-Salas, S. 1974. Genetic variation in natural populations of five Drosophila species and the hypothesis of the selective neutrality of protein polymorphisms. Genetics, 77: 343–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balduf, W.V. 1934. The taxonomic value of ovipositors in some Empoasca species. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 27: 293–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belkhir, K., Borsa, P., Chikhi, L., Raufaste, N., and Bonhomme, F. 2004. GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous WindowsTM pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5171, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier, France.Google Scholar
Bergevin, E., and Zanon, D.V. 1922. Danni alla Vite in Cirenaica e Tripolitania dovuti ad un nuovo Omottero (Chlorita Lybica sp.n.). L'Agricoltura Coloniale, 16: 58–64.Google Scholar
Bünger, I., Liebig, H.-P., and Zebitz, C.P.W. 2002. Die biologische Kontrolle der Baumwollzikade Empoasca decipiens Paoli (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) in Gewaächshausgurken. Gesunde Planzen, 54:105–110. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0345.2002.02023.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, O.V., and Hibbs, E.T. 1970. Oviposition by Empoasca fabae (Harris). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 63: 516–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, H.B., and Ross, H.H., 1965. Characters for specific identification of females in the leafhopper genus Empoasca (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 58: 620–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Giustina, W. 1989. Homoptères Cicadellidae. Vol. 3. Compléments aux ouvrages d'Henri Ribaut. Faune de France, 73.Google Scholar
Dietrich, C.H., Rakitov, R.A., Holmes, J.L., and Black, W.C. IV, 2001. Phylogeny of the major lineages of Membracoidea (Insecta: Hemiptera: Cicadomorpha) based on 28S rDNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 18: 293–305. PMID:11161763 doi:10.1006/mpev.2000.0873.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dietrich, C.H. 2005. Keys to the families of Cicadomorpha and subfamilies and tribes of Cicadellidae (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha). Florida Entomologist, 88: 502–517. doi:10.1653/0015-4040(2005)88[502:KTTFOC]2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Martino, E. 1955. Contributo alla conoscenza biologica dell'Empoasca decedens Paoli e la “fetola” da essa prodotta ai frutti di agrumi in Sicilia esperienze di lotta. Annali della Sperimentazione Agraria (nuova serie), 10: 1512–1552.Google Scholar
Dlabola, J. 1958. A reclassification of Palaeartic Typhlocybinae (Homoptera, Auchenorrhyncha). Acta Societatis Entomologicae Cechosloveniae, 55: 44–57.Google Scholar
Dulzetto, F. 1940. Sull'ovopositore di Empoasca decedens Paoli e sul valore di quest'organo per la diagnosi dei Cicadellidae. Bollettino Zoologia, 11: 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Urso, V. 1995. Homoptera Auchenorrhyncha. In Checklist delle specie della fauna italiana. Vol. 42. Edited by Minelli, A., Ruffoand, S., and Posta, S. La. Calderini, Bologna, ItalyGoogle Scholar
Dworakowska, I. 1972. On some Oriental and Ethiopian genera of Empoascini (Auchenorrhyncha, Cicadellidae, Typhlocybinae). Bulletin de l'Académie Polonaise des Sciences, Série de Sciences Biologiques, Classe. II, 20: 25–34.Google Scholar
Fauna Europaea. 2004. Fauna Europaea. Version 2.1 [online]. Available from http://www.faunaeur.org [accessed 7 April 2010].Google Scholar
Greany, P.D., Hawke, S.D., Carlysle, T C., and Anthony, D.W. 1977. Sense organs in the ovipositor of Biosteres (Opius) longicaudatus, a parasite of the Caribbean fruit fly Anastrepha suspensa. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 70: 319–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habib, A., El-Kady, E.A., and Herakly, F.A. 1975. Taxonomy of jassids infesting truck crops in Egypt (Hemiptera: Jassidae) I. Taxonomy of subfamily Typhlocybinae. Bulletin de la Société Entomologique d'Egypte, 59: 331–343.Google Scholar
Haralabos, T. 2003. La cicalina africana Jacobiasca lybica Bergevin (Homoptera, Cicadellidae) ricompare nei vigneti siciliani. Informatore Fitopatologico, 1: 34–40.Google Scholar
Hoy, M.A. 2003. Insect molecular genetics: an introduction to principles and applications. Academic Press/Elsevier, San Diego, California.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, J.A., Botti, S., Al-Subhi, A.M., Zaidi, M.A., Altosaar, I., Alma, A., and Bertaccini, A. 2003. Molecular characterization of the 16S rRNA gene of phytoplasmas detected in two leafhopper species associated with alfalfa plants infected with witches’ broom in Oman. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 42: 257–267.Google Scholar
Klein, U., Bock, C., Kafka, W.A., and Moore, T.E. 1987. Sensory equipment of the 17-year cicada: structural survey and physiological evidence for olfaction. Chemical Senses, 12: 210–211.Google Scholar
Kumar, S., Tamura, K., Jakobsen, I.B., and Masatoshi, N. 2001. MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software. Bioinformatics, 17: 1244–1245. PMID:11751241 doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loukas, M., and Drosopoulos, S. 1992. Population genetic studies of leafhopper (Empoasca) species. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 63: 71–79. doi:10.1007/BF00350348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loukas, M., and Krimbas, C.B. 1980. Isozyme techniques in Drosophila suboscura. Drosophila Information Service, 55: 157–158.Google Scholar
Meier, R., Shiyang, K., Vaidya, G., and Ng, P.K. 2006. DNA barcoding and taxonomy in Diptera: a tale of high intraspecific variability and low identification success. Systematic Biology, 55: 715–728. PMID:17060194 doi:10.1080/10635150600969864.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nast, J. 1937. Eine neue Art aus der Gattung Empoasca Walsh aus Polen (Homoptera). Annales Musei Zoologici Polonici, 13: 25–27.Google Scholar
Nei, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. The American Naturalist, 106: 283–292. doi:10.1086/282771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ossiannilsson, F. 1981. The Auchenorrhyncha (Homoptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. Part 2: Families Cicadidae, Cercopidae, Membracidae and Cicadellidae (excl. Deltocephalinae). Fauna Entomologica Scandinavica, 7: 223–593.Google Scholar
Parrella, G., Paltrinieri, S., Botti, S., and Bertaccini, A. 2008. Molecular identification of phytoplasmas from virescent ranunculus plants and from leafhoppers in southern Italian crops. Journal of Plant Pathology, 90: 537–543.Google Scholar
Pastore, M., Raffone, E., Santonastaso, M., Priore, R., Paltrinieri, S., Bertaccini, A., and Simeone, A.M. 2004. Phytoplasma detection in Empoasca decedens and Empoasca spp. and their possible role as vector of European fruit yellows (16SrX-B) phytoplasma. Acta Horticulturae, 657: 507–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollini, A., and Bariselli, M. 1995. Diffuse infestazioni di cicaline sul pesco e orientamenti di difesa. Informatore Fitopatologico, 1: 15–18.Google Scholar
Poos, F.W., and Wheeler, N.H. 1943. Studies on host plants of the leafhoppers of the genus Empoasca. United States Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin No. 850.Google Scholar
Raupach, K., Borgemeister, C., Hommes, M., Poehling, H.-M., and Sétamou, M. 2002. Effect of temperature and host plants on the bionomics of Empoasca decipiens (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Crop Protection, 21: 113–119. doi:10.1016/S0261-2194(01)0070-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Readio, P.A. 1922. Ovipositors of Cicadellidae (Homoptera). Kansas University Science Bulletin, 14: 213–299.Google Scholar
Ribaut, E. 1936. Homoptères Auchénorhynques I (Typhlocybidae). Faune de France, 31: 1–231.Google Scholar
Scudder, G.G.E. 1971. Comparative morphology of insect genitalia. Annual Review of Entomology, 16: 379–406. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.16.010171.002115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, C.R., and Prasad, R. 1970. Starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes—a compilation of recipes. Biochemical Genetics, 4: 297–320. PMID: 4193186 doi:10.1007/BF00485780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, C., Frati, F., Beckenbach, A., Crespi, B., Liu, H., and Flook, P. 1994. Evolution, weighting and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 87: 651–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, D.Z., and Camacho, R.F. 1995. Genetic diversity within a potato leafhopper (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) population infesting alfalfa. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 68: 35–42.Google Scholar
SPSS Inc. 1995. SigmaStat. Version 2.0. SPSS Inc., Chicago.Google Scholar
Stoffolano, J.G. Jr, and Yin, L.R.S. 1987. Structure and function of the ovipositor and associated sensilla of the apple maggot, Rhagoletis pomonella (Walsh) (Diptera: Tephritidae). International Journal of Insect Morphology and Embryology, 16: 41–69. doi:10.1016/0020-7322(87)90055-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamura, K., Dudley, J., Nei, M., and Kumar, S. 2007. MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 24: 1596–1599. Available from http://www.kumarlab.net/publications [accessed 6 October 2009].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tautz, D., Arctander, P., Minelli, A., Thomas, R.H., and Vogler, A.P. 2003. A plea for DNA taxonomy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18: 70–74. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00041-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, P.S., Shields, E.J., and Davis, J.I. 1995. Empoasca fabae (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) identification and population studies with allozyme electrophoresis. Environmental Entomology, 24: 1109–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G., and Gibson, T.J. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research, 22: 4673–4680. PMID:7984417 doi:10.1093/nar/22.22.4673. Available from http://www.ebi.ac.uk/clustalw/ [accessed 6 October 2009].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuxen, S.L 1970. Taxonomist's glossary of genitalia in insects. 2nd ed. Munksgaard, Copenhagen, Denmark.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidano, C. 1958. Le Cicaline italiane della Vite (Hemiptera: Typhlocybidae). Bollettino di Zoologia agraria e di Bachicoltura (Serie II), 1: 61–115.Google Scholar
Vidano, C. 1962. Ampelopatie da Tiflocibidi: la Empoasca lybica Bergevin nuovo nemico della vite in Italia. L'Italia Agricola, 99: 329–344.Google Scholar
Vidano, C. 1963. Alterazioni provocate da Insetti in Vitis osservate, sperimentate e comparate. Annali Facoltà di Scienze Agrarie della Università di Torino, 1: 513–644.Google Scholar
Vidano, C., and Arzone, A. 1976. Tiflocibini infestanti piante officinali in Piemonte. Annali dell'Accademia di Agricoltura di Torino, 118: 195–208.Google Scholar
Vidano, C., and Arzone, A. 1983. Biotaxonomy and epidemiology of Typhlocybinae on vine. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Leafhoppers and Planthoppers of Economic Importance London, 1982. Edited by Knight, W.J., Pant, N.C., Robertson, T.S., and Wilson, M.R.. Commonwealth Institute of Entomology, London, United Kingdom. pp. 75–85.Google Scholar
Vidano, C., Arzone, A., and Alma, A. 1987. Investigations on Auchenorrhyncha accused or suspected to be noxious to vine in Italy. In Proceedings of the Expert Group Meeting on “Integrated Pest Control in Viticulture”, Portoferraio, Italy, 26–28 September 1985. Edited by Cavalloro, R.. Balkema, A.A., Rotterdam, The Netherlands, and Brookfield, Vermont. pp. 87–95.Google Scholar
Walsh, P.S., Metzger, D.A., and Higuchi, R. 1991. Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. Biotechniques, 10: 506–512. PMID:1867860.Google ScholarPubMed
Wheeler, T.A. 2004. Bioinformatics and misinformatics: the missing links between taxonomic data and taxonomic databases. Newsletter of the Biological Survey of Canada (Terrestrial Arthropods), 23: 1–5.Google Scholar
Zacharuk, R.Y. 1985. Antennae and sensilla. In Comprehensive insect physiology biochemistry and pharmacology. Vol. 6. Nervous system: sensory. Edited by Kergut, G.A and Gilbert, L.I.Pergamon Press, New York. pp. 1–69.Google Scholar