Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:32:52.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Species of Trichomalopsis (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) associated with filth flies (Diptera: Muscidae) in North America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Gary A.P. Gibson  and
Kevin Floate
Gary A.P. Gibson*
Affiliation:
Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, K.W. Neatby Building, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6
Kevin Floate
Affiliation:
Lethbridge Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, PO Box 3000, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1J 4B1
*
1 Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed (E-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Five species of Trichomalopsis Crawford associated with Haematobia irritans (L.) (horn fly), Musca domestica L. (house fly), Musca autumnalis DeGeer (face fly), and Stomoxys calcitrans (L.) (stable fly) in North America are reviewed. The species Trichomalopsis americana (Gahan), Trichomalopsis dubia (Ashmead), Trichomalopsis sarcophagae (Gahan), Trichomalopsis tachinae (Gahan), and Trichomalopsis viridescens (Walsh) are described, keyed, and differentiated from other recognized North American species. Lectotypes are designated for T. dubia, T. sarcophagae, and T. tachinae. Distribution and host associations are recorded for the species. Trichomalopsis americana and T. viridescens are newly recorded as parasitoids of M. domestica; T. dubia and T. sarcophagae are also newly recorded as parasitoids of Hypoderma lineatum (Villers) (common cattle grub) and Hypoderma bovis (L.) (northern cattle grub), respectively. Some previously published host associations and parasitoid identifications are corrected based on examination of voucher specimens. The known biology of each species is reviewed. The presence of Trichomalopsis albipilosa (Gahan) in North America is considered to be erroneous based on a misidentification of T. americana.

Résumé

Le statut de cinq espèces de Trichomalopsis Crawford associées à Haematobia irritans (L.) (la Mouche des cornes), à Musca domestica L. (la Mouche domestique), à Musca autumnalis DeGeer (la Mouche faciale) et à Stomoxys calcitrans (L.) (la Mouche des étables) a fait l’objet d’un nouvel examen. Une clé d’identification permettra de reconnaître les espèces Trichomalopsis americana (Gahan), Trichomalopsis dubia (Ashmead), Trichomalopsis sarcophagae (Gahan), Trichomalopsis tachinae (Gahan) et Trichomalopsis viridescens (Walsh), qui sont décrites et différenciées des autres espèces nord-américaines. Des lectotypes ont été désignés pour T. dubia, T. sarcophagae et T. tachinae. La répartition de chacune de ces espèces ainsi que les associations hôtes–parasitoïdes sont étudiées. C’est la première fois que l’on rencontre les parasitoïdes T. americana et T. viridescens chez M. domestica, T. dubia chez Hypoderma lineatum (Villers) (l’Hypoderme rayé) et T. sarcophagae chez Hypoderma bovis (l’Hypoderme du boeuf). À la suite d’un nouvel examen des spécimens témoins, nous sommes en mesure d’apporter des corrections à des publications antérieures dans lesquelles des parasitoïdes ont été identifiés et associés à des hôtes. La biologie de chacune des espèces est réexaminée. La mention de Trichomalopsis albipilosa (Gahan) en Amérique du Nord est considérée comme une erreur; l’espèce a probablement été confondue avec T. americana.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 133 , Issue 1 , February 2001 , pp. 49 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, W.W., Smith, R.E. 1958. Some factors influencing the efficiency of Apanteles medicaginis Mues. (Hym. Braconidae) as a parasite of the alfalfa caterpillar, Colias philodice eurytheme Boisd. Hilgardia 28: 1–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnaud, P.H. Jr., 1978. A host-parasite catalog of North American Tachinidae (Diptera). United States Department of Agriculture Miscellaneous Publication 1319Google Scholar
Ashmead, W.H. 1896. Descriptions of new parasitic Hymenoptera. Transactions of the Entomological Society of America 23: 179–234Google Scholar
Baker, A.W. 1915. The army worm in Ontario in 1914. Entomological Society of Ontario Annual Report 45: 75–90Google Scholar
Baker, W.A., Bradley, W.G., Clark, C.A. 1949. Biological control of the European corn borer in the United States. United States Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin 983Google Scholar
Balduf, W.V. 1929. Bionomic notes on some parasites of Achatodes zeae Harris (Noctuidae, Lep.) and Phlyctaenia tertialis (Guen.) (Pyralidae, Lep.). Ohio Journal of Science 29: 218–42Google Scholar
Balduf, W.V. 1968. Bionomic notes on the hexapodous parasites of Acrobasis rubrifasciella. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 61: 463–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, R.L., Simpson, R.G. 1975. Biology of Eupteromalus americanus: a hyperparasite of Bathyplectes curculionis. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 68: 1117–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, H. 1927. The fern-feeding species of Papaipema; no. 25 (Lepidoptera). The Canadian Entomologist 59: 92–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blickenstaff, C.C., Arbuthnot, K.D., Harris, H.M. 1953. Parasites of the European corn borer. Iowa State College Journal of Science 27: 335–79Google Scholar
Blume, R.R. 1970. Insects associated with bovine droppings in Kerr and Bexar counties, Texas. Journal of Economic Entomology 63: 1023–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolte, K.B. 1996. Techniques for obtaining scanning electron micrographs of minute arthropods. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Ontario 127: 67–87Google Scholar
Bouček, Z. 1988. Australasian Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera). A biosystematic revision of genera of fourteen families, with a reclassification of species. Wallingford: CAB InternationalGoogle Scholar
Bouček, Z., Heydon, S.L. 1997. Pteromalidae. pp 541–692in Gibson, G.A.P., Huber, J.T., Woolley, J.B. (Eds), Annotated keys to the genera of Nearctic Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera). Ottawa: National Research Council of Canada Research PressGoogle Scholar
Breakey, E.P. 1930. Contribution to a knowledge of the spindle worm, Achatodes zeae (Harris) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 23: 175–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burks, B.D. 1958. Superfamily Chalcidoidea. pp 62–84in Krombein, K.V. (Ed), Hymenoptera of America north of Mexico — synoptic catalog. United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Monograph 2 (first supplement)Google Scholar
Burks, B.D. 1967. Superfamily Chalcidoidea. pp 213–82 in Krombein, K.V., Burks, B.D. (Eds), Hymenoptera of America north of Mexico — synoptic catalog. United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Monograph 2 (second supplement)Google Scholar
Burks, B.D. 1979. Family Pteromalidae. pp 768–835in Krombein, K.V., Hurd, P.D., Smith, D.R., Burks, B.D. (Eds), Catalog of Hymenoptera in America north of Mexico. Volume I. Washington: Smithsonian Institution PressGoogle Scholar
Clausen, C.P. 1942. The relations of taxonomy to biological control. Journal of Economic Entomology 35: 744–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Compere, H. 1969. The role of systematics in biological control: a backward look. Israel Journal of Entomology 4: 5–10Google Scholar
Crawford, J.C. 1913. Descriptions of new Hymenoptera, Number 6. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 45: 241–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalla Torre, KW von. 1898. Catalogus Hymenopterorum hucusque descriptorum systematicus et synonymicus. V. Chalcididae et Proctotrupidae. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Danks, H.V. 1988. Systematics in support of entomology. Annual Review of Entomology 33: 271–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decker, G.C. 1931. The biology of the stalk borer Papaipema nebris (Gn.). Iowa Agricultural Experiment Station Research Bulletin 143: 289–351Google Scholar
Decker, G.C. 1935. The parasites of some lepidopterous stalk borers in Iowa. Iowa State College Journal of Science 9: 567–80Google Scholar
Depner, K.R. 1968. Hymenopterous parasites of the horn fly, Haematobia irritans (Diptera: Muscidae), in Alberta. The Canadian Entomologist 100: 1057–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobesh, S.M., Petersen, J.J., Jones, J.A. 1994. Reproduction and development of Trichomalopsis species (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae), a parasite of filth flies. Biological Control 4: 48–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Essig, E.O. 1926. Insects and mites of western North America. New York: Macmillan Co.Google Scholar
Figg, D.E., Hall, R.D., Thomas, G.D. 1983. Insect parasites associated with Diptera developing in bovine dung pats on central Missouri pastures. Environmental Entomology 12: 961–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floate, K.D., Soroka, J., Spooner, R.W. 1999 a. Development of Muscidifurax and Trichomalopsis (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) on cabbage root maggot (Anthomyiidae: Delia radicum). Report 58. pp 168–70 in 1998 Pest Management Research Report. Expert Committee on Integrated Pest Management. London: Research Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food CanadaGoogle Scholar
Floate, K., Khan, B., Gibson, G. 1999 b. Hymenopterous parasitoids of filth fly (Diptera: Muscidae) pupae in cattle feedlots. The Canadian Entomologist 131: 347–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frana, J.E., O'Neil, R.J. 1993. Parasitism of late instar larvae of the cattail caterpillar, Simyra henrici (Grote) (Lepidoptera: Noctuiidae) in Indiana. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 66: 399–404Google Scholar
Frohne, W.C. 1939. Semiaquatic Hymenoptera in north Michigan lakes. Transactions of the American Microscopal Society 58: 228–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gahan, A.B. 1914. Descriptions of new genera and species, with notes on parasitic Hymenoptera. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 48: 155–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gahan, A.B. 1917. Descriptions of some new parasitic Hymenoptera. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 53: 195–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gahan, A.B. 1921. On the identity of several species of Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 22: 235–43Google Scholar
Gahan, A.B. 1924. Some new parasitic Hymenoptera with notes on several described forms. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 65: 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gahan, A.B. 1933. The serphoid and chalcidoid parasites of the Hessian fly. United States Department of Agriculture Miscellaneous Publication 174Google Scholar
Gaines, D.N., Kok, L.T. 1995. Cotesia orobenae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a gregarious endoparasitoid of Evergestis rimosalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), and hyperparasitoids in Virginia Brassica crops. Biological Control 5: 573–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, G.A.P. 1997. Morphology and terminology. pp 16–44in Gibson, G.A.P., Huber, J.T., Woolley, J.B. (Eds), Annotated keys to the genera of Nearctic Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera). Ottawa: National Research Council Canada Research PressGoogle Scholar
Gibson, G.A.P. 2000. Differentiation of the species of Urolepis (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Pteromalidae), potential biocontrol agents of filth flies (Diptera: Muscidae). The Canadian Entomologist 132: 391–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, J.U. 1938. Notes on Apanteles congregatus (Say) as a parasite of tobacco hornworms. Journal of Economic Entomology 31: 712–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girault, A.A. 1912[113]. Reconstruction of the chalcid genus Hypopteromalus Ashmead of the family Pteromalidae. Its position, redescription, history and the synonymy of its type species. Bulletin of the Wisconsin Natural History Society 10: 24–46Google Scholar
Girault, A.A. 1917[330]. Descriptiones Hymenopterorum Chalcidoidicarum variorum cum observationibus. Glendale, V., Maryland: private publicationGoogle Scholar
Girault, A.A. 1926[399]. Notes and descriptions of Australian chalcid flies — IV (Hymenoptera). Insecutor Inscitiae Menstruus 14: 58–73Google Scholar
Goulet, H., Mason, W.R.M. 1993. Use of keys. pp 60–64in Goulet, H., Huber, J.T. (Eds), Hymenoptera of the world: An identification guide to families. Agriculture Canada Research Branch Publication 1894/EGoogle Scholar
Graham, MWR de V. 1969. The Pteromalidae of North-Western Europe (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Entomology 16: 1–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigarick, A.A. 1959. Bionomics of the rice leaf miner, Hydrellia griseola (Fallen), in California (Diptera: Ephydridae). Hilgardia 20: 1–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grissell, E.E. 1999. Hymenoptera biodiversity: some alien notions. American Entomologist 45: 235–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamlin, J.C., Lieberman, F.V., Bunn, R.W., McDuffie, W.C., Newton, R.C., Jones, L.J. 1949. Field studies of the alfalfa weevil and its environment. United States Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin 975Google Scholar
Harcourt, D.G. 1960. Biology of the diamond back moth, Plutella maculipennis (Curt.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), in eastern Ontario. The Canadian Entomologist 92: 419–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heiss, E.M. 1938. A classification of the larvae and puparia of the Syrphidae of Illinois exclusive of aquatic forms. Bulletin of the University of Illinois 36Google Scholar
Hill, C.C. 1953. Parasites of the Hessian fly in the north central states. United States Department of Agriculture Circular 923Google Scholar
Hoebeke, E.R., Rutz, D.A. 1988. Trichomalopsis dubius (Ashmead) and Dibrachys cavus (Walker): newly discovered pupal parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) of house flies and stable flies associated with livestock manure. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 81: 493–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmaster, R.N., Greenwood, D.E. 1949. Fall armyworm control on forage and truck crops. Journal of Economic Entomology 42: 502–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, J.T. 1998. The importance of voucher specimens, with practical guidelines for preserving specimens of the major invertebrate phyla for identification. Journal of Natural History 32: 367–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J.B., Miller, T.D. 1994. A parasite Freraea montana (Diptera: Tachinidae) and hyperparasite Trichomalopsis sarcophagae (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) of an adult ground beetle Amara quenseli (Coleoptera: Carabidae): new host associations discovered in Idaho. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 96: 373–4Google Scholar
Kamijo, K., Grissell, E.E. 1982. Species of Trichomalopsis Crawford (Hymenoptera, Pteromalidae) from rice paddy, with descriptions of two new species. Kontyu 50: 76–87Google Scholar
Kelsheimer, E.G., Neiswander, C.R. 1928. Description of the behavior of each stage of the European corn borer. III. pp 13–81in Huber, L.L., Neiswander, C.R., Salter, R.M. (Eds), The European corn borer and its environment. Bulletin of the Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station 429Google Scholar
Kurdjumov, N.W. 1913. Notes on Pteromalidae (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Russkoe Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 13: 1–24Google Scholar
Lysyk, T.J. 1995. Parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae, Ichneumonidae) of filth fly (Diptera: Muscidae) pupae at dairies in Alberta. Veterinary Entomology 88: 659–65Google Scholar
Lysyk, T.J. 1998. Relationships between temperature and life history parameters of Trichomalopsis sacrophagae (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Environmental Entomology 27: 488–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, T., Galloway, T.D. 1999. Survey and release of parasitoids (Hymenoptera) attacking house and stable flies (Diptera: Muscidae) in dairy operations. The Canadian Entomologist 131: 743–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertins, J.W., Coppel, H.C. 1973. Adaptation of native and exotic hyperparasites to the introduced primary sawfly parasite, Exenterus amictorius (Panzer), in Wisconsin. Entomophaga 18: 19–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noyes, J.S. 1994. The reliability of published host-records: a taxonomist's view. Norwegian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 16: 59–69Google Scholar
Noyes, J.S. 1998. Catalogue of the Chalcidoidea of the World. Amsterdam: Expert Center for Taxonomic Information [CD-Rom]Google Scholar
O'Hara, J.E., Wood, D.M. 2000. Tachinidae of America north of Mexico. Internet document, 21 February 2000. Available via URL:http://res2.agr.ca/ecorc/isbi/cat/cathom.htmGoogle Scholar
Peck, O. 1951. Family Pteromalidae. pp 534–68 in Muesebeck, C.F.W., Krombein, K.V., Townes, H.K. (Eds), Hymenoptera of America north of Mexico — synoptic catalog. United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Monograph 2Google Scholar
Peck, O. 1963. A catalogue of the Nearctic Chalcidoidea (Insecta: Hymenoptera). The Canadian Entomologist (Supplement) 30Google Scholar
Peck, O. 1974. Chalcidoid (Hymenoptera) parasites of the horn fly, Haematobia irritans (Diptera: Muscidae), in Alberta and elsewhere in Canada. The Canadian Entomologist 106: 473–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, K.S., Burkhardt, C.C. 1974. Hyperparasites of Bathyplectes curculionis in Wyoming. Proceedings of the North Central Branch of the Entomological Society of America 29: 169–70Google Scholar
Poole, R.W., Gentili, P. (Editors). 1997, Nomina Insecta Nearctica. A check list of the insects of North America. Rockville: Entomological Information Services [CD-Rom]Google Scholar
Poos, F.W. 1928. An annotated list of some parasitic insects. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 30: 145–50Google Scholar
Puttler, B. 1966. Biological notes on some hyperparasites of Bathyplectes curculionis (Thomson). Journal of Economic Entomology 59: 483–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rethwisch, M.D., Manglitz, G.R. 1986. Parasitoids of Bathyplectes curculionis (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) in southeastern Nebraska. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 59: 648–52Google Scholar
Riley, C.V. 1870. Annual report of the Missouri State Board of Agriculture 5Google Scholar
Riley, C.V. 1885. On the parasites of the hessian fly. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 8: 413–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivers, D.B., Pagnotta, M.A., Huntington, E.R. 1998. Reproductive strategies of 3 species of ectoparasitic wasps are modulated by the response of the fly host Sarcophaga bullata (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) to parasitism. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 91: 458–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueda, L.M., Axtell, R.C. 1985. Guide to common species of pupal parasites (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) of the house fly and other muscoid flies associated with poultry and livestock manure. North Carolina Agricultural Research Service Technical Bulletin 278Google Scholar
Schauff, M.E., LaSalle, J. 1998. The relevance of systematics to biological control: protecting the investment in research. pp 425–36 in Zalucki, M.P., Drew, R., White, G. (Eds), Pest Management – Future Challenges, Proceedings of the 6th Australian Applied Entomological Conference, Brisbane, 29 September – 2 October 1998, Volume 1.Google Scholar
Smith, L., Rutz, D.A. 1991 a. Seasonal and relative abundance of hymenopterous parasitoids attacking house fly pupae at dairy farms in central New York. Environmental Entomology 20: 661–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L., Rutz, D.A. 1991 b. Microhabitat associations of hymenopterous parasitoids that attack house fly pupae at dairy farms in central New York. Environmental Entomology 20: 675–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, G.D., Morgan, C.E. 1972. Parasites of the horn fly in Missouri. Journal of Economic Entomology 65: 169–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, C.G. 1878. Hymenoptera Scandinaviae 5. Pteromalus (Svederus) continuatio. Lund, SwedenGoogle Scholar
USDA. 1977. Summary of pest conditions in the United States – 1976. Cooperative Plant Pest Report 2: 253–65Google Scholar
Vickery, R.A. 1926. Observations on Cirphis latiuscula H. Sch. in the gulf coast region of Texas. Journal of Agricultural Research 32: 1099–119Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1835. Monographia Chalciditum. Entomological Magazine 3: 182–206Google Scholar
Walker, H.G., Anderson, L.D. 1936. Control of cabbage worms. Virginia Truck Experiment Station Bulletin 93: 1379–94Google Scholar
Walsh, B.D. 1861. Insects injurious to vegetation in Illinois. Transactions of the Illinois State Agricultural Society 4: 335–72Google Scholar
Walsh, B.D. 1865. Insects injurious to vegetation in Illinois. Transactions of the Illinois State Agricultural Society 5: 469–83Google Scholar
Wylie, H.G. 1973. Parasites of face fly, Musca autumnalis (Diptera: Muscidae), and associated Diptera near Belleville, Ontario. The Canadian Entomologist 105: 257–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wylie, H.G. 1976. Observations on life history and sex ratio variability of Eupteromalus dubius (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae), a parasite of cyclorrhaphous Diptera. The Canadian Entomologist 108: 1267–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zungoli, P.A. 1979. Eupteromalus viridescens (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae), a new parasite association for Pediobius foveolatus (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) and Epilachna varivestis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 81: 663–5Google Scholar