Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:27:58.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Notes on the Biology of Monochamus scutellatus (Say) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

A. H. Rose
Affiliation:
Forest Insect Laboratory, Sault Ste. Marie, Ont.

Extract

Generally throughout eastern Canada, wood borers of the genus Monochamus present the greatest single theat to softwood logs that must remain in the woods thrnughoat the summer and to standing trees killed as a result of fire or other disturbance. Althoush a considerable body of literature has been accumulated on the general biology and taxonomy of rlie econonucally important species (4, 5, 11, 15), on the ainount of damage caused by them under particular circumstances (2, 12), and on the protection of logs from damage (1, 3, 10, 13, 14), comparatively little detail is available on their seasonal development.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1)Becker, W. B., Abbott, H. G. and Rich, J. H.. 1956. Effect of lindane emulsion sprays on the insect invasion of white pine sawlogs and the grade yield of the resulting lumber. J. Econ. Ent. 49 (5): 664666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Belyea, R. M. 1952. Death and deterioration of balsam fir weakened by spruce bud-worm defoliation Pt. 1. Can. Ent. 84 (11): 325335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Blais, J. R. 1953. Borer control in balsam fir, spruce, and jack pine logs. Can. Dept. Agr., Div. For. Biol. Bi-monthly Prog. Rept. 9 (2): 23.Google Scholar
(4)Craighead, F. C. 1923. North American Cerambycid larvae. Can. Dept. Agr. Bull. 27, New Series; 239 pp.Google Scholar
(5)Gardiner, L. M. 1950. Wood borers in fire-killed pine. Can. Dept. Agr., Div. For. Biol. Bi-monthly Prog. Rept. 6 (3): 12.Google Scholar
(6)Ghent, A. W. 1956. Linear increment in width of the head capsule of two species of sawflies. Can. Ent. 88 (1): 1723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Graham, S. A. 1939. Principles of forest entomology. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 2nd ed.Google Scholar
(8)Harding, J. P. 1949. The use of probability paper for graphical analysis of polymodal frequency distributions. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. United Kingdom 28: 141153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Morgan, C. V. G. 1948. The biology of Monochamus notatus morgani (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Proc. Ent. Soc. B.C. 44: 2830.Google Scholar
(10)Morley, P. M. 1939. Time of cut as a factor influencing infestation of coniferous logs. Can. Ent. 71: 243250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Parmelee, F. T. 1941. Longhorned and flat-headed borers attacking fire-killed coniferous timber in Michigan, J. Econ. Ent. 34 (3): 377380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Richmond, H. A. and Lejeune, R. R.. 1925. The deterioration of fire-killed white spruce by wood boring insects in northern Saskatchewan. For. Chron. 21 (3): 125.Google Scholar
(13)Simpson, L. J. 1951. Prevention of damage by borers in softwood logs or fire-killed timber. Can. Dept. Agr.; Div. For. Biol., Proc. Pub. 5 pp.Google Scholar
(14)Swaine, J. M. 1917. Shade tree and forest insects of Manitoba. Can. Agr. Gaz. 4 (9): 755763.Google Scholar
(15)Swaine, J. M. and Craighead, F. C.. 1924. Studies on the spruce budworm (Cacoecia fumiferana Clem.). Can. Dept. Agr., Tech. Bull. 37.Google Scholar