Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:24:46.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SOIL APPLICATION OF CARBOFURAN TO CONTROL SPRUCE BUDWORM, CHORISTONEURA FUMIFERANA (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE), IN A MANAGED WHITE SPRUCE SEED PRODUCTION AREA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

W. H. Fogal ,
D. A. Winston ,
S. M. Lopushanski ,
D. A. MacLeod  and
A. J. Willcocks
W. H. Fogal
Affiliation:
Petawawa National Forestry Institute, Canadian Forestry Service, Chalk River, Ontario K0J 1J0
D. A. Winston
Affiliation:
Petawawa National Forestry Institute, Canadian Forestry Service, Chalk River, Ontario K0J 1J0
S. M. Lopushanski
Affiliation:
Petawawa National Forestry Institute, Canadian Forestry Service, Chalk River, Ontario K0J 1J0
D. A. MacLeod
Affiliation:
Computing and Applied Statistics Directorate, Environment Canada, Hull, Quebec K1A 1C7
A. J. Willcocks
Affiliation:
Bonner Tree Improvement Centre, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Kapuskasing, Ontario P5N 2W4
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

White spruce, Picea glauca (Moench) Voss, is a major commercial tree species used in reforestation programs throughout Canada, and seed requirements cannot be met in some years because of insect damage and the periodic nature of cone crops. The spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.), feeds on buds and cones of its hosts, causing a pronounced decrease in cone production (Schooley 1978). A current outbreak in northeastern Ontario poses a serious threat to white spruce seed supply from high value, managed seed production areas. Therefore, in 1979, we began an experiment to determine whether carbofuran, a systemic insecticide, could be used to protect buds and cones when applied to soil. We chose carbofuran because it has proved successful for control of some insects in seed orchards in the southeastern United States (DeBarr 1978)

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 113 , Issue 10 , October 1981 , pp. 949 - 951
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barber, L. R. 1979. Evaluation of two carbofuran soil incorporating systems. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv., For. Insect and Dis. Mgmt Rep. 70117.Google Scholar
DeBarr, G. L. 1978. South-wide tests of carbofuran for seedbug control in pine seed orchards. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv., Res. Pap. SE-185.Google Scholar
Eis, S. 1967. Cone crops of white and black spruce are predictable. For. Chron. 43: 247252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eis, S. and Inkster, J.. 1972. White spruce cone production and prediction of cone crops. Can. J. For. Res. 2: 460466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkel, E. P., Fatzinger, C. W., and Draper, L. Jr., 1977. Evaluation of carbofuran for control of thrips, coneworms and seedbugs in a slash pine seed orchard. Proc. 14th sth. For. Tree Improv. Conf., pp. 116121.Google Scholar
National Research Council of Canada. 1979. Carbofuran: Criteria for interpreting the effects of its use on environmental quality. Publ. natn. Res. Counc. Can. 16740.Google Scholar
Pree, D. J. and Saunders, J. L.. 1973. Bioactivity and translocation of carbofuran residues in Mugho pine. Environ. Ent. 2: 260267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puritch, G. S. 1977. Cone production in conifers. A review of the literature and evaluation of research needs. Can. For. Serv. Rep. BC-X-65.Google Scholar
Schooley, H. O. 1978. Effects of spruce budworm on cone production by balsam fir. For. Chron. 54: 298301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochrane, W. G.. 1967. Statistical Methods. 6th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar