Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:58:09.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE SITE OF PHEROMONE PRODUCTION IN TRYPODENDRON LINEATUM (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE): BIO-ASSAY AND HISTOLOGICAL STUDIES OF THE HINDGUT1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

I. Schneider  and
J. A. Rudinsky
I. Schneider
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Oregon State University, Corvallis
J. A. Rudinsky
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Oregon State University, Corvallis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bio-assay showed that the pheromone of attractive female Trypodendron lineatum (Oliv.) must be produced in the posterior part of the ileum. Histological studies revealed a layer of secretory cells in the rear part of the ileum and the rectal valve which occur only in feeding adults. The attractive material is produced only when bark and wood particles are present at the site of pheromone production, and the actual production is initiated probably by activity of a female hormone or enzyme.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 101 , Issue 11 , November 1969 , pp. 1181 - 1186
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chapman, J. A. 1966. The effect of attack by the ambrosia beetle Trypodendron lineatum (Olivier) on log attractiveness. Can. Ent. 98: 50–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jantz, O. K., and Rudinsky, J. A.. 1965. Laboratory and field methods for assaying olfactory responses of the Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopkins. Can. Ent. 97: 935–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitman, G. B., Kliefoth, R. A., and Vité, J. P.. 1965. Studies on the pheromone of Ips confusus (Leconte). II: Further observations on the site of production. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. Pl. Res. 23: 13–18.Google Scholar
Pitman, G. B., and Vité, J. P.. 1963. Studies on the pheromone of Ips confusus (Lec.). I: Secondary sexual dimorphism in the hindgut epithelium. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. Pl. Res. 22: 221–225.Google Scholar
Rudinsky, J. A. 1968. Pheromone-mask by the female Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopk., an attraction regulator (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Pan-Pacif. Ent. 44: 248–250.Google Scholar
Rudinsky, J. A., and Daterman, G. E.. 1964. Response of ambrosia beetle Trypodendron lineatum (Oliv.) to a female-produced pheromone. Z. angew. Ent. 54: 300–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudinsky, J. A., and Schneider, I.. 1968. On the olfactory behavior of Trypodendron lineatum (Oliv.). Proc. XIIIth int. Congr. Ent., Moscow, Aug. 1968.Google Scholar
Schneider, I., and Rudinsky, J. A.. 1969. Mycetangial glands and their seasonal changes in Gnathotrichus retusus and G. sulcatus. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 62: 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zethner-Moller, O., and Rudinsky, J. A.. 1967. Studies on the site of sex pheromone production in Dendroctonus pseudotsugae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 60: 575–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar