Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T01:07:24.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SEX-SPECIFIC HABITAT UTILIZATION BY BAGWORMS (LEPIDOPTERA: PSYCHIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Marc Rhainds
Affiliation:
Centre for Pest Management, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Bumaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
Gerhard Gries*
Affiliation:
Centre for Pest Management, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Bumaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
Ahmad Saleh
Affiliation:
London Sumatra Indonesia, Bah Lias Research Station, Medan, Sumatra Utara, Indonesia
*
1To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Extract

Bagworms (Lepidoptera: Psychidae) have an unusual life history (Borror et al. 1989). Following eclosion, apterous females stay within their pupal case and the protective bag they constructed as larvae. Females attract winged males by expelling pheromone-impregnated scales outside of their pupal case into the lower extremity of the bag. Sexual segregation of pupation sites has been found in three bagworms, Thyridopteryx ephemeraeformis (Haworth) (Gross andFritz 1982), Oiketicus kirbyi (Guilding) (Rhainds et al. 1995a, 1995b), and Metisa plarza (Mlker) (Rhainds, unpublished). In all three bagworms, proportionately more female than male larvae pupate in the upper strata of trees. Pupation of females in upper sites is adaptive because it may enhance any to all of the following: pheromone dissemination (Gross and Fritz 1982), mate attraction (Rhainds et al. 1995a, 1995b), progeny development (Rhainds, unpublished), and dispersal of neonatal larvae (Cox and Potter 1988). We report habitat segregation between male and female pupae of the bagworm Clania cramerii (Mstwood) (Thangavelu and Ravindranath 1985).

Type
Note
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borror, D.J., Triplehorn, C.A., and Johnson, N.F.. 1989. An Introduction to the Study of Insects. Saunders College Publishing, Montreal, Quebec. 875 pp.Google Scholar
Cox, D.L., and Potter, D.A.. 1988. Within-crown distributions of male and female bagworm (Lepidoptera: Psychidae) pupae on juniper as affected by host defoliation. The Canadian Entomologist 120: 559567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, S.W., and Fritz, R.S., 1982. Differential stratification, movement and parasitism of sexes of the bagworm Thyridopteryx ephemeraeformis on redcedar. Ecological Entomology 7: 149154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhainds, M., Gries, G., and Chinchilla, C.. 1995 a. Pupation site and emergence time influence the mating success of bagworm females, Oiketicus kirbyi. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 77: 183187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhainds, M., Gries, G., and Castrillo, G.. 1995 b. Pupation site affects the mating success of small but not large female bagworms, Oiketicus kirbyi (Lepidoptera: Psychidae). Oikos 74: 213217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thangavelu, S., and Ravindranath, M.H.. 1985. Morphology and life-history of the bag-worm moth Clania cramerii (Westwood). Journal of Natural History 19: 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar