Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:15:08.259Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SEX ATTRACTION AND COURTSHIP BEHAVIOR IN LAMBDINA FISCELLARIA LUGUBROSA (LEPIDOPTERA: GEOMETRIDAE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D. P. Ostaff ,
R. F. Shepherd  and
J. H. Borden
D. P. Ostaff
Affiliation:
Pestology Centre, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia
R. F. Shepherd
Affiliation:
Pacific Forest Research Centre, Canadian Forestry Service, Victoria, British Columbia
J. H. Borden
Affiliation:
Pestology Centre, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Calling by female Lambdina fiscellaria lugubrosa (Hulst) occurred when terminal abdominal segments 8–10 were protracted, exposing an enlarged region in the intersegmental membrane between segments 8 and 9. Histological examination of this region disclosed paired glands situated ventrolaterally in the eighth segment. The glands were presumed to be pheromone glands, and differ from those described for other Lepidoptera, in their paired structure and ventrolateral position. More males were attracted to traps containing virgin females than to empty control traps, but only during the first half of the moth flight. Board and yellow carton sticky traps were superior to 3M and white carton traps. Behavioral observations suggested that the sex pheromone may serve as an excitant as well as, or instead of, an attractant, stimulating the male to searching activity.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 106 , Issue 5 , May 1974 , pp. 493 - 501
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berisford, C. W. and Brady, U. E.. 1972. Attraction of Nantucket pine tip moth males to the female sex pheromone. J. econ. Ent. 65: 430–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bierl, B. A., Beroza, M., and Collier, C. W.. 1972. Isolation, identification and synthesis of the gypsy moth attractant. J. econ. Ent. 65: 659–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doane, C. C. 1968. Aspects of mating behavior of gypsy moth. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 61: 768–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fatzinger, C. W. and Asher, W. C.. 1971. Mating behavior and evidence for a sex pheromone of Dioryctria abietella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae [Phycitinae]). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 64: 612–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findlay, J. A. and MacDonald, D. R.. 1966. Investigation of the sex-attractant of the spruce budworm moth. Chemistry in Canada 18: 47–48.Google Scholar
Götz, B. 1951. Die Sexualduftstoffe an Lepidopteren. Experientia 7: 406–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granett, J. 1973. Sex attractant pheromone activity in elm spanworm. J. econ. Ent. 66: 808–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humasson, G. L. 1967. Animal tissue techniques. 2nd ed. Freeman, San Francisco and London.Google Scholar
Jefferson, R. N. and Rubin, R. E.. 1970. Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. XVII. A clarification of the description of the female sex pheromone gland of Prodenia litura. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63: 431–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, R. N., Shorey, H. H., and Gaston, L. K.. 1966. Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. X. The morphology and histology of the female sex pheromone gland of Trichoplusia ni. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 59: 1166–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, R. N., Shorey, H. H., and Rubin, R. E.. 1968. Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. XVI. The morphology of the female sex pheromone glands of eight species. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 61: 861–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leppla, N. C. 1972. Calling behavior during pheromone release in the female pink bollworm moth. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 65: 281–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacFarlane, J. H. and Earle, N. W.. 1970. Morphology and histology of the female sex pheromone gland of the salt-marsh caterpillar, Estigmene acrea (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63: 1327–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMorran, A. 1965. A synthetic diet for the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.). Can. Ent. 97: 58–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otvos, I. S. 1972. Sex attraction in the eastern hemlock looper. Can. Dep. For. Bi-mon. Res. Notes 28: 22.Google Scholar
Percy, J. E. and Weatherston, J.. 1971. Studies of physiologically active arthropod secretions. IX. Morphology and histology of the pheromone-producing glands of some female Lepidoptera. Can. Ent. 103: 1733–1741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Percy, J. E., Gardiner, E. J., and Weatherston, J.. 1971. Studies of physiologically active arthropod secretions. VI. Evidence for a sex pheromone in female Orgyia leucostigma (Lepidoptera: Lymantridae). Can. Ent. 103: 706–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pointing, P. J. 1961. The biology and behaviour of the European pine shoot moth, Rhyacionia buoliana (Schiff.), in southern Ontario. I. Adult. Can. Ent. 93: 1098–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, C. J. 1969. Extrusion of the female sex pheromone gland in the Eastern spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 101: 760–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorey, H. H. 1964. Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. II. Mating behavior of Trichoplusia ni with special reference to the role of the sex pheromone. Ann. ent. Soc. 57: 371–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, S. 1956. Non-parametric statistics for behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, Toronto.Google Scholar
Strubble, D. L. 1970. A sex pheromone in the forest tent caterpillar. J. econ. Ent. 68: 295–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tvermyr, S. 1969. Sex pheromone in females of Erannis aurantiaria Hb. and E. defoliaria Cl. (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Norwegian J. Ent. 16: 25–28.Google Scholar
Weatherston, J., Roelofs, W. L., Comeau, A., and Sanders, C. J.. 1971. Studies of physiologically active arthropod secretions. X. Sex pheromone of the Eastern spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 103: 1741–1747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wray, C. and Farrier, M. H.. 1963. Response of the Nantucket pine tip moth to attractants. J. econ. Ent. 56: 714–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar