Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T11:32:10.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SECONDARY EFFECTS OF CANOPY DIEBACK: THE EPIGEAL CARABID FAUNA IN QUÉBEC APPALACHIAN MAPLE FORESTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

J. Martel ,
Y. Mauffette  and
S. Tousignant
J. Martel
Affiliation:
Groupe de recherche en écologie forestière, Département des sciences biologiques, Université du Québec à Montréal, C.P. 8888, Succ. A, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3C 3P8
Y. Mauffette
Affiliation:
Groupe de recherche en écologie forestière, Département des sciences biologiques, Université du Québec à Montréal, C.P. 8888, Succ. A, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3C 3P8
S. Tousignant
Affiliation:
Groupe de recherche en écologie forestière, Département des sciences biologiques, Université du Québec à Montréal, C.P. 8888, Succ. A, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3C 3P8
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The impact of canopy dieback on the activity and diversity of epigeal Carabidae was studied during the summers of 1987 and 1988 in 18 maple stands in southeastern Québec, using pitfall traps. A canopy thinning index (CTI) based on severity and incidence of dieback, and on tree basal area was calculated for each of the 72 stations sampled. An analysis of variance shows that canopy dieback had a significant effect on carabid beetle activity in 1988. The CTI was negatively correlated with the carabid species richness and diversity in 1988. The number of individuals caught per station was negatively correlated with the CTI for all species combined, except for the dominant Pterostichus coracinus Newm. in 1988. These results indicate a negative response of carabid beetles to canopy dieback in 1988; the climate may have tempered the effects of dieback in 1987.

Résumé

Une étude de l’impact du dépérissement du couvert sur l’activité et la diversité de la faune carabique épigée a été réalisée au cours des étés 1987 et 1988 dans 18 érablières du sud-est du Québec avec l’aide de pièges-fosses. Un indice d’éclaircissage du couvert (IEC) basé sur la sévérité et l’incidence du dépérissement ainsi que la surface terrière des arbres a été calculé pour chacune des 72 stations échantillonnées. Une analyse de variance démontre que le dépérissement a eu un effet significatif sur l’activité des Carabidae en 1988. L’IEC était corrélé négativement avec la richesse et la diversité spécifique des Carabidae en 1988. Le nombre d’individus capturés par piège-fosse et l’IEC pour toutes les espèces combinées à l’exception de Pterostichus coracinus Newm., l’espèce dominante, étaient corrélés négativement en 1988. Ces résultats indiquent une réponse négative des Carabidae à l’éclaircissement du couvert en 1988 alors que le climat pourrait avoir tempéré les effets du dépérissement en 1987.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 123 , Issue 4 , August 1991 , pp. 851 - 859
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arsenault, A., Bessette, G., Bergeron, Y., Brisson, J., Gagnon, D., and Mauffette, Y.. 1989. Facteurs écologiques liés au dépérissement des forêts feuillues du sud-est du Québec. pp. 144–149 in Atelier sur le dépérissement des érablières. Ministère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation du Québec, 89-0143. 159 pp.Google Scholar
Begon, M., Harper, J.L., and Townsend, C.R.. 1986. Ecology: Individuals, Populations, and Communities. Sinauer, Sunderland. 876 pp.Google Scholar
Bernier, B., and Brazeau, M.. 1988. Nutrient deficiency symptoms associated with sugar maple dieback and decline in the Quebec Appalachians. Can. J. For. Res. 18: 762–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, J.T., and McIntosh, R.P.. 1951. An upland forest continuum in the prairie–forest border region of Wisconsin. Ecology 32: 476–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freitag, R. 1979. Carabid beetles and pollution. pp. 507–521 in Erwin, T.L., Ball, G.E., and Whitehead, D.R. (Eds.), Carabid Beetles: Their Evolution, Natural History, and Classification. Dr. W. Junk, The Hague. 635 pp.Google Scholar
Gagnon, G., and Bordeleau, C.. 1990. Dépérissement des érablières. pp. 8–10in Insectes et maladies des arbres Québec — 1989, supplément de Forêt Conservation, Volume 57 n° 1.Google Scholar
Gregory, R.A., Williams, M.W., Wong, B.L., and Hawley, G.J.. 1986. Proposed scenario for dieback and decline of Acer saccharum in northeastern U.S.A. and southeastern Canada. IAWA Bull. 7: 357–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halsall, N.B., and Wratten, S.D.. 1988. The efficiency of pitfall trapping for polyphagous predatory Carabidae. Ecol. Ent. 13: 293–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendershot, W.H., and Jones, A.R.C.. 1989. Maple decline in Quebec: A discussion of possible causes and the use of fertilizers to limit damage. For. Chron. 65: 280–287.Google Scholar
Houle, G. 1990. Growth patterns of sugar maple seedlings and mature trees in healthy and in declining hardwood stands. Can. J. For. Res. 20: 894–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabacik-Wasylik, D. 1980. Carabidae communities of potato and cereal crops in industrial environment of Silesia. Pol. Ecol. Stud. 6: 673–684.Google Scholar
Klein, R.M., and Perkins, T.D.. 1988. Primary and secondary causes and consequences of contemporary forest decline. Bot. Rev. 54: 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenski, R.E. 1982 a. The effects of forest cutting on two Carabus species: Evidence for competition for food. Ecology 63: 1211–1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenski, R.E. 1982 b. The impact of forest cutting on the diversity of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in the southern Appalachians. Ecol. Ent. 7: 385–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesniak, A. 1980. Changes in the structures of overground communities of Carabidae, Coleoptera as bioindicators of pollution of forest environments. pp. 219–221in Spaleny, J. (Ed.), Proceedings of the IIIrd Internationale Conference Bioindicatores Deteriorisationis Regionis 12–16th September 1977. Prague, Czechoslovakia.Google Scholar
Levesque, C., Dube, J., and Pilon, J.G.. 1976. Inventaire et étude biocénotique des coléoptères Carabidae de biotopes forestiers des Laurentides (Québec). Nat. Can. 103: 569–582.Google Scholar
Levesque, C., and Levesque, G.Y.. 1986. Activité et succession saisonnière de coléoptères épigés d'une forêt décidue du sud du Québec. Nat. Can. 113: 39–46.Google Scholar
Manion, P.D. 1987. Decline as a phenomenon in forests: Pathological and ecological considerations. pp. 267–275 in Hutchinson, T.C., and Meema, K.M. (Eds.), Effects of Atmospheric Pollutants on Forests, Wetlands and Agricultural Ecosystems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 652 pp.Google Scholar
Martel, J. 1989. Populations et communautés d'insectes forestiers dans des érablières saines et dépéries du sudest du Québec. Mémoire de maîtrise, Université du Québec à Montréal.Google Scholar
McIlveen, W.D., Rutherford, S.T., and Linzon, S.N.. 1986. A historical perspective of sugar maple decline within Ontario and outside of Ontario. Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Phytotoxicology Section, ARB-141-86-Phyto. 40 pp.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, D.L., Linzon, S.N., Dimma, D.E., and McIlveen, W.D.. 1987. Sugar maple decline in Ontario. pp. 101–116 in Hutchinson, T.C., and Meema, K.M. (Eds.), Effects of Atmospheric Pollutants on Forests, Wetlands and Agricultural Ecosystems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 652 pp.Google Scholar
Morrill, W.L., Lester, D.G., and Wrona, A.E.. 1990. Factors affecting efficacy of pitfall traps for beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae and Tenebrionidae). J. ent. Sci. 25: 284–293.Google Scholar
Niemela, J., Haila, Y., Halme, E., Lahti, T., Pajunen, T., and Puntillá, P.. 1988. The distribution of carabid beetles in fragments of old coniferous taiga and adjacent managed forest. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 25: 107–119.Google Scholar
Paje, F., and Mossakowski, D.. 1984. pH-preferences and habitat selection in carabid beetles. Oecologia 64: 41–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perkins, T.D., Vogelmann, H.W., and Klein, R.M.. 1987. Changes in light intensity and soil temperature as a result of forest decline on Camels Hump, Vermont. Can. J. For. Res. 17: 565–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, H.J., Wheater, C.P., and Martin, M.H.. 1987. Aspects of the ecology of Carabidae (Coleoptera) from woodlands polluted by heavy metals. Environ. Pollut. 48: 61–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SAS Institute Inc. 1988. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Release 6.03 Edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. 1028 pp.Google Scholar
Sustek, Z. 1981. Influence of clear cutting on ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in a pine forest. Commun. Inst. For. Cechoslov. 12: 243–254.Google Scholar
Szyszko, J. 1974. Relationship between the occurrence of epigeic carabids (Coleoptera, Carabidae), certain soil properties, and species composition of a forest stand. Ekol. Pol. 22: 237–274.Google Scholar
Thiele, H.U. 1977. Carabid Beetles in their Environments: A Study on Habitat Selection by Adaptations in Physiology and Behaviour. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 369 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tousignant, S., Martel, J., and Mauffette, Y.. 1990. Invertébrés de la litière dans des érablières saines et dépéries du sud-est du Québec. Can. J. Zool. 68: 2445–2449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, A.J. 1989. The analysis of stress in natural populations. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 37: 51–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar