Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:41:26.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SEASONAL INCIDENCE OF SINGLE AND MULTIPLE PARITY IN MANSONIA PERTURBANS (DIPTERA: CULICIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

David W. Trueman
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A1
Susan B. McIver
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A1

Abstract

Parity of Mansonia perturbans was monitored in Algonquin Park, Ontario from 17 June to 12 August 1981. The first parous individual was recorded on 8 July and parity increased to a plateau of about 60% in late July. The first biparous individual was observed on 30 July and a triparous mosquito was collected on 12 August.

Résumé

L'état reproducteur a été investigué chez Mansonia perturbans dans le parc Algonquin en Ontario du 17 juin au 12 août 1981. Le premier individu qui s'était reproduit a été enregistré le 8 juillet et la proportion d'individus s'étant reproduits a augmenté jusqu'à un plateau de 60% tard en juillet. Le premier individu bipare fut observé le 30 juillet et un moustique tripare a été collectionné le 12 août.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allan, S. A., Surgeoner, G. A., Helson, B. V., and Pengelly, D. H.. 1981. Seasonal activity of M. perturbans adults (Diptera: Culicidae) in southwestern Ontario. Can. Ent. 113: 133139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detinova, T. S. 1962. Age-grouping Methods of Diptera of Medical Importance. World Health Organization, Geneva. 216 pp.Google ScholarPubMed
Downe, A. E. R. 1962. Some aspects of host selection by Mansonia perturbans (Walk.) (Diptera: Culicidae). Can. J. Zool. 40: 725732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emord, D. E. and Morris, C. D.. 1982. A host-baited CDC trap. Mosq. News 42: 220224.Google Scholar
Feldlaufer, M. F. and Crans, W. J.. 1979. The relative attractiveness of carbon dioxide to parous and nulliparous mosquitoes. J. med. Ent. 15: 140142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howitt, C. M., Dodge, H. R., Bishop, L. K., and Gorrie, R. H.. 1949. Recovery of the virus of eastern equine encephalitis from mosquitoes (M. perturbans) collected in Georgia. Science 110: 141142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. J. and Bennett, G. F.. 1980. Observations on the biology of M. perturbans (Diptera: Culicidae) in the Nova Scotia - New Brunswick border region. Can. J. Zool. 58: 20842088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnarelli, L. A. 1977. Physiological age of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) and observations of partial bloodfeeding. J. med. Ent. 13: 445450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trueman, D. W. and McIver, S. B.. 1981. Detecting fine-scale temporal distributions of biting flies: a new trap design. Mosq. News 41: 439443.Google Scholar
Wood, D. M., Dang, P. T., and Ellis, R. A.. 1979. The insects and arachnids of Canada. Part 6. The mosquitoes of Canada (Diptera: Culicidae). Agric. Can. Publ. 1686.Google Scholar