Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T02:27:30.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SEASONAL DAMAGE BY INSECTS AND SQUIRRELS TO FEMALE REPRODUCTIVE STRUCTURES OF BLACK SPRUCE, PICEA MARIANA (MILL.) B.S.P.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Y.H. Prévost ,
J.E. Laing  and
V.F. Haavisto
Y.H. Prévost
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
J.E. Laing
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
V.F. Haavisto
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The seasonal damage to female reproductive structures (buds, flowers, and cones) of black spruce, Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P., was assessed during 1983 and 1984. Nineteen insects (five Orders) and the red squirrel, Tamiasciurus hudsonicus (Erxleben), were found feeding on these reproductive structures. Collectively, these organisms damaged 88.9 and 53.5% of the cones in 1983 and 1984, respectively. In the 2 years, Lepidoptera damaged 61.8% of the cones in 1983 and 44.4% of the cones in 1984. The spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.), and the spruce coneworm, Dioryctria reniculelloides Mut. and Mun., were the most important pests. Cones damaged by Lepidoptera could be classed into three categories: (a) severe, yielding no seeds; (b) moderate, yielding 22.3 seeds per cone; and (c) light, yielding 37.5 seeds per cone. Undamaged cones yielded on average 39.9 seeds per cone. Red squirrels removed 18.8% of the cones in 1983 and none in 1984. The spruce cone axis midge, Dasineura rachiphaga Tripp, and the spruce cone maggot, Lasiomma anthracinum (Czerny), caused minor damage in both years. Feeding by spruce cone axis midge did not reduce cone growth significantly or the number of viable seeds per cone, but feeding by the spruce cone maggot did. During both years new damage by insects to the female reproductive structures of the experimental trees was not observed after mid-July. In 1983 damage by red squirrels occurred from early to late September. In 1984 damage to cones on trees treated with dimethoate was 15.6% compared with 53.5% for untreated trees, without an increase in the number of aborted cones.

Résumé

Les dommages saisonniers des structures réproductives femelles (bourgeons, fleurs, et cônes) de l’épinette noire, Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P., ont été évalués en 1983 et 1984. Dix-neuf insectes (cinq ordres) et l’écureuil roux, Tamiasciurus hudsonicus (Erxleben), se sont nourri de ces structures réproductives. Ces herbivores ont endommagé 88,9 et 53,5% des cônes en 1983 et 1984 respectivement, les lépidoptères ont endommagé 61,8 et 44,4%. La tordeuse des bourgeons de l’épinette, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.), et la pyrale du cône de l’épinette, Dioryctria reniculelloides Mut. and Mun., étaient les plus importants. Les cônes endommagés par les lépidoptères ont été classés dans trois catégories : (a) sévère, ne produisant aucune graine; (b) modéré, contenant en moyenne 22,3 graines par cône; et (c) léger, contenant 37,5 graines par cône. Les écureuils roux ont endommagé 18,8% des cônes en 1983 et n’ont causé aucun dégât en 1984. La cécidomyie du cône de l’épinette, Dasineura rachiphaga Tripp, et la mouche du cône de l’épinette, Lasiomma anthracinum (Czerny), ont causé peu de dommage pendant les deux années. Le dommage par la cécidomyie du cône n’a eu aucun effet sur la croissance du cône ni’sur le nombre de graines viables par cône, tandis que le dommage par la mouche du cône les a diminué significativement. En 1983 et 1984 aucun nouveau dégât par les insectes aux structures reproductive femelles des arbres expérimentaux on a été observé après la mi-juillet. En 1983 les dégâts par les écureuils ont eu lieu pendant septembre. En 1984, les ravages aux cônes provenant d’arbres traités avec du diméthoate one été limités à 15,6, comparé à 53,5% pour les arbres non-traités, sans augmenté le nombre de cônes avortés.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 120 , Issue 12 , December 1988 , pp. 1113 - 1121
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1988

References

Brink, C.H., and Dean, F.C.. 1966. Spruce seed as a food of red squirrels and flying squirrels in interior Alaska. J. Wdlf. Mgmt. 30: 503–512.Google Scholar
Cyanamid. 1979. Pesticide Products Guide. 124 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeBarr, G.L., and Barber, L.R.. 1975. Mortality factors reducing the 1967–1968 slash pine seed crop. In Baker County Florida, a Life Table Approach. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. SE 131. 16 pp.Google Scholar
DeBarr, G.L., and Ebel, B.H.. 1974. Conelet abortion and seed damage of shortleaf and loblolly pines by a seedbug, Leptoglossus corculus. For. Sci. 20: 165–170.Google Scholar
DeBarr, G.L., and Kormanik, P.P.. 1975. Anatomical basis for conelet abortion on Pinus echinata following feedings by Leptoglossus corculus (Hemiptera: Coreidae). Can. Ent. 107: 81–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebel, B.H., and Yates, H.O. III. 1974. Insect-caused damage to conelets, cones and seed of shortleaf pine. J. econ. Ent. 67: 222–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eis, S., Garman, E.H., and Ebell, L.F.. 1965. Relation between cone production and diameter increment of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziessi (Mirb.) Franco), grand fir (Abies grandis (Dougl.) Lindl.) and western white pine (Pinus monticola Dougl.). Can. J. Bot. 43: 1553–1559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fye, R.F., and Wylie, W.D.. 1968. Notes on insects attacking spruce and fir cones at Black Sturgeon Lake Ontario 1963–4. Can. For. Serv. Bi-mon. Res. Notes 27: 47–48.Google Scholar
Haig, R.A., and McPhee, H.G.. 1969. Black spruce cone insect control trial, Longlac, Ontario 1967–68. Can. For. Serv. GLFC, Info. Rep. O–X–110. 9 pp.Google Scholar
Harcourt, D.G. 1970. Crop life tables as a pest management tool. Can. Ent. 102: 950–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedlin, A.F. 1973. Spruce cone insects in British Columbia and their control. Can. Ent. 114: 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Seed Testing Association. 1976. International rules for seed testing 1976. Seed Sci. Technol. 4: 3–180.Google Scholar
Mattson, W.J. 1978. The role of insects in the dynamics of cone production of red pine. Oecologia 33: 327–349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLeod, J.M., and Daviault, L.. 1963. Notes on the life history and habits of the spruce cone worm Dioryctria reniculella (Grt.) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Can. Ent. 95: 309–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G.E., and Hutcheson, D.W.. 1981. Aerial spraying for control of the spiral spruce-cone borer, Hylemya anthracina (Diptera: Anthomyiidae). J. ent. Soc. Brit. Columb. 78: 3–6.Google Scholar
Niklas, K.J. 1984. The motion of windborne pollen grains around ovulate cones: implications on wind pollinations. Am. J. Bot. 71: 356–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauf, A., Benjamin, D.M., and Cecich, R.A.. 1985. Insects affecting seed production of jack pine, and life tables of conelet and cone mortality in Wisconsin. For. Sci. 32: 271–281.Google Scholar
Roques, A. 1977. Etude du complexe entomologique lié aux cônes du pin sylvestre en forêt de Fontainebleau. Bull. Ecol. 8: 415–434.Google Scholar
Schooley, H.O. 1980. Damage to black spruce cone crops by the spruce budworm. Can. For. Serv. NFRC Info. Rep. N–X–187. 15 pp.Google Scholar
Schooley, H.O. 1983. A deathwatch cone beetle (Anobiidae: Ernobius bicolor) reduces the natural storage of black spruce seed in Newfoundland. For. Chron. 59: 139–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spies, C.J. III, and Dimond, J.B.. 1985. Some populational relationships between spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) and spruce coneworm, Dioryctria reniculelloides (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Can. Ent. 117: 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syme, P.D. 1981. Black spruce cone and seed insects: A special study. Can. For. Serv. GLFRC Newsl. Summer 1981: 1–2.Google Scholar
Tripp, H.A. 1954. The instars of a maggot (Pegohylemia) inhabiting white spruce cones. Can. Ent. 86: 185–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripp, H.A. 1955. Descriptions and habits of Cecidomyiidae (Diptera) from white spruce cones. Can. Ent. 87: 253–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, H.R., Drouin, J.A., and McLeod, B.B.. 1959. Observation on a “complex” of insects in tops of black spruce in Manitoba and Saskatchewan. Can. Ent. 91: 543–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, H.O. III, and Ebel, B.H.. 1978. Impact of insect damage on loblolly pine seed production. J. econ. Ent. 71: 345–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar