Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T17:05:08.237Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A SAMPLING PLAN FOR STUDIES ON THE POPULATION DYNAMICS OF WHITE GRUBS, PHYLLOPHAGA SPP. (COLEOPTERA: SCARABAEIDAE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

J. C. Guppy
Affiliation:
Ottawa Research Station, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa
D. G. Harcourt
Affiliation:
Ottawa Research Station, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa

Abstract

A study of sampling variation in the white grubs Phyllophaga fusca Froelick and P. anxia LeConte in a permanent meadow showed that inter-plot differences occurred in 70% of the samples. Block differences were rarely significant. For all stages, the most appropriate sample unit was a 1 ft cube of soil and sod. The number of samples required was inversely proportional to population density; this relationship was graphed for three levels of sampling precision.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burrage, R. H. and Gyrisco, G. G.. 1954. Distribution of third instar larvae of the European chafer and the efficiency of various sampling units for estimating their populations. J. econ. Ent. 47: 10091014.Google Scholar
Finney, D. J. 1946. Field sampling for the estimation of wireworm populations. Biometrics Bull. 2(1): 17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleming, W. E. and Baker, F. E.. 1936. A method for estimating populations of larvae of the Japanese beetle in the field. J. agric. Res. 53(5): 319331.Google Scholar
Forbes, S. A. 1907. On the life-history, habits, and economic relations of the white-grubs and May-beetles. Bull. Ill. agric. Exp. Stn 116: 447480.Google Scholar
Guppy, J. C. and Harcourt, D. G.. 1970. Spatial pattern of the immature stages and teneral adults of Phyllophaga spp. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in a permanent meadow. Can. Ent. 102: 13541359.Google Scholar
Hammond, G. H. 1948. The distribution, life-history and control of Phyllophaga anxia LeC. in Quebec and Ontario. Scient. Agric. 28: 403416.Google Scholar
Harcourt, D. G. 1961. Design of a sampling plan for studies on the population dynamics of the diamondback moth, Plutella maculipennis (Curt.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Can. Ent. 93: 820831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ives, W. G. H. and Warren, G. L.. 1965. Sequential sampling for white grubs. Can. Ent. 97: 596604.Google Scholar
LeRoux, E. J. and Reimer, C.. 1959. Variation between samples of immature stages, and of mortalities from some factors, of the eye-spotted bud moth, Spilonota ocellana (D. & S.) (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae), and the pistol case-bearer, Coleophora serratella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae), on apple in Quebec. Can. Ent. 91: 428449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R. F. 1955. The development of sampling techniques for forest insect defoliators, with particular reference to the spruce budworm. Can. J. Zool. 33: 225294.Google Scholar
Ritcher, P. O. 1940. Kentucky white grubs. Bull. Kentucky agric. Exp. Stn 401: 71157.Google Scholar
Yates, F. and Finney, D. J.. 1942. Statistical problems in field sampling for wireworms. Ann. appl. Biol. 29(2): 144196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar