Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:40:26.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A REVISION OF THE NORTH AMERICAN OPEROPHTERA (LEPIDOPTERA: GEOMETRIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

James T. Troubridge  and
Sheila M. Fitzpatrick
James T. Troubridge
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada Research Station, 6660 N.W. Marine Drive, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1X2
Sheila M. Fitzpatrick
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada Research Station, 6660 N.W. Marine Drive, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1X2
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The North American members of the genus Operophtera Hübner (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) are revised to include three species: O. brumata (L.), O. bruceata (Hulst), and O. danbyi (Hulst). Operophtera occidentalis (Hulst) is now treated as a subspecies of O. bruceata. All species are illustrated and characters to distinguish the species are given. The most useful characters for separating O. brumata from O. bruceata include the following: (1) hindwing dorsal surface with discal dot, which is almost always visible on O. bruceata but absent from O. brumata; (2) forewing colour, which is grey-brown or light brown in O. bruceata but reddish-brown in O. brumata; (3) abdomen colour, which is golden-brown to brown in western O. bruceata but brown in O. brumata; and (4) the costa of the forewing ventral surface, which is usually golden-brown in O. bruceata but brown in O. brumata. The structure of the genitalia of these two species allows hybridization between O. bruceata males and O. brumata females, but not vice versa.Hypothesized species interrelationships between palaearctic and nearctic Operophtera are illustrated in a cladogram. Maps for the distribution of each species are also included.

Résumé

Les membres nord américains du genre Operophtera Hübner (Lepidoptera : Geometridae) ont fait l’objet d’une révision pour y inclure trois espèces : O. brumata (L.), O. bruceata (Hulst), et O. danbyi (Hulst). Operophtera occidentalis (Hulst) est maintenant traité comme une sous-espèce de O. bruceata (Hulst). Cet article contient des illustrations de toutes les espèces et donne les caractères distinctifs de chacune. Les charactères les plus important servant à différencier O. brumata de O. bruceata sont : (1) un point discoïdal sur la face dorsale de l’aile postérieure, lequel est presque toujours visible sur O. bruceata mais absent sur O. brumata; (2) la couleur de l’aile antérieure, laquelle est grise-brune ou légèrement brune pour O. bruceata tandis que rousse-brune pour O. brumata, (3) la couleur de l’abdomen, laquelle est brune-dorée pour O. bruceata de l’ouest mais brune pour O. brumata, et (4) la marge antérieure de la face ventrale de l’aile antérieure, laquelle est généralement brune-dorée pour O. bruceata tandis que brune pour O. brumata. La structure génitale de ces deux espèces permet l’hybridation entre les mâles O. bruceata et les femelles O. brumata, mais non l’inverse.Des relations proposées entre les espèces des groupes paléarctiques et néarctiques Operophtera sont illustrées dans un diagramme phylogénique. Cet article comprend aussi des cartes de l’aire de distribution des espèces.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 125 , Issue 2 , April 1993 , pp. 379 - 397
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnes, W., and McDunnough, J.. 1917. Check List of the Lepidoptera of Boreal America. Herald Press, Decatur, IL. 392 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechstein, J.M., and Scharfenberg, G.L.. 1805. Vollständige Naturgeschtchte der schädlichen Forstinsekten. III. C.F.E. Richter, Leipzig. 3 v. 1042 pp.Google Scholar
Blackmore, E.H. 1927. Check-list of the Macrolepidoptera of British Columbia. Charles F. Banfield, Victoria, B.C.47 pp.Google Scholar
Boisduval, J.A. 1840. Genera and Index Methodicus. Apud Roret, Bibliopolam, Paris. 238 pp.Google Scholar
Cooke, N. 1882. A geometer new to science. The Entomologist 15: 57–58.Google Scholar
de Lesse, H. 1951. Expéditions polaires françaises (Missions Paul-Émile Victor) Zoologie - 4e note Macrolepidoptera. Annales de la Societé Entomologique de France 118: 51–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Villers, C. 1789. Caroli Linnaei. Entomologia, faunae Suecicae descriptionibus. II. 656 pp.Google Scholar
Downes, J.A. 1966. The Lepidoptera of Greenland; Some geographic considerations. The Canadian Entomologist 98(11): 1135–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eidt, D.C., and Embree, D.G.. 1968. Distinguishing larvae and pupae of the winter moth, Operophtera brumata, and the Bruce spanworm, O. bruceata (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). The Canadian Entomologist 100: 536–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eidt, D.C., Embree, D.G., and Smith, C.C.. 1966. Distinguishing adults of the winter moth Operophtera brumata (L.) and Bruce spanworm O. bruceata (Hulst) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). The Canadian Entomologist 98: 258–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Embree, D.G. 1966. The role of introduced parasites in the control of the winter moth in Nova Scotia. The Canadian Entomologist 98: 1159–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esper, E.J.C. 1794. Die Schmetterlinge in Abbildungen nach der Natur, Erlangen. I (1777) - V (1794). L. D. Wetgel, Leipzig. v 5, 590 pp.Google Scholar
Ferguson, D.C. 1978. Pests not known to occur in the United States or of limited distribution. Winter moth Operophtera brumata (L.) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). U.S. Department of Agriculture Cooperative Plant Pest Report 3 (48–52): 687–694.Google Scholar
Ferguson, D.C. 1983. In Hodges, R.W. et al. (Eds.), Check List of the Lepidoptera of America North of Mexico. E.W. Classey Ltd. and the Wedge Entomological Research Foundation, London. 284 pp.Google Scholar
Fletcher, D.S. 1979. In Nye, I.W.B. (Ed.), The Generic Names of Moths of the World. 3. Geometroidea. Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History), London. 243 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, W.T. 1928. Order Lepidoptera. pp. 532–687in Leonard, M.D. (Ed.), A List of the Insects of New York with a List of the Spiders and Certain Other Allied Groups. Cornell University Agricultural Experimental Station Memoir 101.Google Scholar
Forbes, W.T. 1948. Lepidoptera of New York and Neighboring States. Part II. Cornell University Agricultural Experimental Station Memoir 274: 263 pp.Google Scholar
Gillespie, D.R., Finlayson, T., Tonks, N.V., and Ross, D.A.. 1978. Occurrence of the winter moth, Operophtera brumata (L.) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae), on southern Vancouver Island, British Columbia. The Canadian Entomologist 110: 223–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossbeck, J.A. 1907. Notes on certain described species of Geometridae, with descriptions of a few new species. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 33: 335–343.Google Scholar
Hale, M.A. 1989. Factors Affecting the Distribution and Survival of an Endemic and Introduced Species of Operophtera (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). M.Sc. thesis, University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C.90 pp.Google Scholar
Haworth, A.W. 1803. Lepidoptera Britannica. J. Murray, London. 609 pp.Google Scholar
Herrich-Schäffer, G.A.W. 1847. Systematische Bearbeitung der Schmetterlinge von Europa, zugleich als text, revision und supplement zu Jakob Hübner's Sammlung europäischer Schmetterlinge. Dritter Band. Die Spanner. G.J. Manz, Regensburg. 1–180.Google Scholar
Hodges, R.W. 1971. The Moths of America North of Mexico. Fascicle 21. Sphingoidea. E.W. Classey Ltd. and R.B.D. Publications, London. 158 pp., 14 pl.Google Scholar
Hübner, J. 1796. Sammlung Europaischer Schmetterlinge. Augsberg. v. 6. 113 pp.Google Scholar
Hübner, J. 1816 (1825). Verzeichniss bekannter Schmetterlinge. Verfasser zu finden. Augsberg. 431 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hübner, J. 1816 (1826). Verzeichniss bekannter Schmetterlinge. Verfasser zu finden. Augsberg. 431 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hübner, J. 1822. Systematisch-alphabetisches Verzeichniss aller bisher bey den Furbildungen zur Sammlung europaischer Schmetterlinge angegeben Guttungs benennungen: mit Vormerkung auch augsbergscher Gattungen. Verfasser zu finden. Augsberg. 81 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulst, G.D. 1886. New species of Geometridae. Entomologica Americana 2: 120–124.Google Scholar
Hulst, G.D. 1896. A classification of the geometrina of North America, with descriptions of new genera and species. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 23: 245–386.Google Scholar
Hulst, G.D. 1902. In Dyar, H.G. (Ed.), A List of the North American Lepidoptera. Bulletin (United States National Museum) 52: 723 pp. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Kimberling, D.N., Miller, J.C., and Penrose, R.L.. 1986. Distribution and parasitism of winter moth, Operophtera brumata (Lepidoptera: Geometridae), in western Oregon. Environmental Entomology 15: 1142–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumakov, A.P., and Korshunov, Yu.P.. 1979. Cheshuekrle Saratovskoi Oblasti. Izdatel'stvo Saratovskogo Universiteta 664: 1–240.Google Scholar
Lederer, J. 1853. Die spanner. Verhandlungen des zoologisch-botanischen Vereins in Wien 3: 251.Google Scholar
Leraut, P. 1980. Liste systématique et synonymique des lépidoptères de France, Belgique et Corse. Alexanor supplement. 334 pp.Google Scholar
Llewellyn-Jones, J.R.J. 1951. An annotated check list of the Macrolepidoptera of British Columbia. Entomological Society of British Columbia Occasional Paper 1: 1–148.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Caroli Linni Systema naturae, per regna tria natur, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Editio X. Laurentii Salvii, Stockholm. v. 1. 832 pp.Google Scholar
McDunnough, J. 1938. Check list of the Lepidoptera of Canada and the United States of America. 1: Macrolepidoptera. Memoirs of the Southern California Academy of Science 1: 1–272.Google Scholar
Meyrick, E. 1892. On the classification of the Geometrina of the European fauna. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 1892: 53–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R.F. 1980. Butterflies and Moths of Newfoundland and Labrador. Agriculture Canada Publication 1691: 407 pp.Google Scholar
Nakajima, H. 1991 a. Two new species of the genus Operophtera (Lepidoptera, Geometridae) from Japan. Tyô to Ga 42(3): 195–205.Google Scholar
Nakajima, H. 1991 b. A new name for Operophtera vulgaris Nakajima, 1991 (Lepidoptera, Geometridae, Larentiinae). Tyô to Ga 42(4): 248.Google Scholar
Newman, E. 1842. Cerambycitum Insularum Manillarum Dom. Cuming captorum enumeratio digesta. Entomologist 1: 288–293.Google Scholar
Orth, D.J. 1967. Dictionary of Alaska Place Names. Geological Survey Professional Paper 567: 1084 pp. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Packard, A.S. 1876. A monograph of the geometrid moths or Phalaenidae of the United States. In Hayden, F.W. (Ed.), Report of the Geological Survey of the Territories. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC. 607 pp.Google Scholar
Pierce, F.N. 1914. The genitalia of the group of Geometridae of the Lepidoptera of the British Islands. F.N. Pierce, Liverpool. 88 pp., 48 pl.Google Scholar
Pivnick, K.A. 1988. Wing colouration difference between the Bruce spanworm Operophtera bruceata (Hulst) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) and the winter moth Operophtera brumata (L.) on Vancouver Island. The Canadian Entomologist 120: 697–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pivnick, K.A., Barton, D.L., Millar, J.G., and Underhill, E.W.. 1988. Improved pheromone trap exclusion of the Bruce spanworm Operophtera bruceata (Hulst) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) when monitoring winter moth Operophtera brumata (L.) populations. The Canadian Entomologist 120: 389–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prout, L.B. 1914. Genus Operophtera. In Seitz, A. (Ed.), The Macrolepidoptera of the World. A. Kernen, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Rambur, J.P. 1870. Séances de l'année 1870. Annales de la Societé Entomologique de France 10(4): 31.Google Scholar
Rindge, F.H. 1955. The type material in the J.B. Smith and G.D. Hulst collections of Lepidoptera in the American Museum of Natural History. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 106(2): 95–172.Google Scholar
Skou, P. 1986. The Geometrid Moths of North Europe. E.J. Brill/Scandinavian Science Press, Leiden. 348 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J.B. 1903. Check List of the Lepidoptera of Boreal America. American Entomological Society, Philadelphia, PA. 136 pp.Google Scholar
Stephens, J.F. 1829. A Systematic Catalogue of British Insects (2). Baldwin and Cradock, London. 388 pp.Google Scholar
Staudinger, O., and Rebel, H.. 1901. Catalog der Lepidopteren des Palaearctischen Faunengebietes. R. Friedländer and Son, Berlin. 368 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underhill, E.W., Millar, J.G., Ring, R.A., Wong, J.W., Barton, D., and Giblin, M.. 1987. Use of a sex attractant and an inhibitor for monitoring winter moth and Bruce spanworm populations. Journal of Chemical Ecology 13: 1319–1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viidalepp, Ya. 1977. A list of the Geometridae (Lepidoptera) of the USSR. Communication 2. Entomological Review 56(3): 52–63.Google Scholar
Wolff, N.L. 1964. The Lepidoptera of Greenland. Meddelelser om Groenland 159 (11): 1–72. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Wood, W. 1839. Index Entomologicus; or, A Complete Illustrated Catalogue of the Lepidopterous Insects of Great Britain. W. Wood, London. 266 pp.Google Scholar