Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:54:04.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revision of the New World species of the genus Monomachus Klug (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea, Monomachidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Luciana Musetti  and
Norman F. Johnson
Luciana Musetti*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, The Ohio State University, 1315 Kinnear Road, Columbus, Ohio 43212, United States of America
Norman F. Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, The Ohio State University, 1315 Kinnear Road, Columbus, Ohio 43212, United States of America
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The species of the genus Monomachus Klug occurring in the Americas are revised. The genus is found from Chile and Argentina north to the Mexican states of Oaxaca and Chiapas. A total of 20 species are considered to be valid and 9 are described as new: M. atratussp. nov., M. aurifersp. nov., M. cultratussp. nov., M. exulsp. nov., M. intonsussp. nov., M. paulussp. nov., M. satyrussp. nov., M. serratussp. nov., and M. velatussp. nov. The species M. bicolor Szépligeti, M. cubiceps Schrottky, M. eurycephalus Schletterer, M. fuscator (Perty), M. glaberrimus Schletterer, M. klugii Westwood, M. megacephalus Schletterer, M. pallescens Schletterer, M. porteri Brèthes, M. segmentator Westwood, and M. variegatus Schletterer are redescribed. Monomachus lateralis Westwood is considered a nomen dubium stat. nov.; a lectotype is designated for M. cubiceps; and Monomachus fuscator andinus Schulz is treated as a junior synonym of M. fuscator, syn. nov. A key to the species of the New World and a checklist of the world species is provided. Monomachus fuscator and M. eurycephalus are parasitoids of the coffee pest Chiromyza vittata Wiedemann (Diptera: Stratiomyidae, Chiromyzinae).

Résumé

Nous avons fait la révision des espèces du genre Monomachus Klug qui habitent les Amériques. Le genre se répartit depuis le Chili et l'Argentine jusqu'aux états mexicains d'Oaxaca et du Chiapas vers le nord, en tout, 20 espèces valides, dont 9 sont décrites pour la première fois: M. atratussp. nov., M. aurifersp. nov., M. cultratussp. nov., M. exulsp. nov., M. intonsussp. nov., M. paulussp. nov., M. satyrussp. nov., M. serratussp. nov. et M. velatussp. nov. Nous décrivons de nouveau les espèces M. bicolor Szépligeti, M. cubiceps Scrottky, M. eurycephalus Schletterer, M. fuscator (Perty), M. glaberrimus Schletterer, M. klugii Westwood, M. megacephalus Schletterer, M. pallescens Schletterer, M. porteri Brèthes, M. segmentator Westwood et M. variegatus Schletterer. Nous considérons M. lateralis Westwood comme un nomen dubium, stat. nov.; nous avons désigné un lectotype pour M. cubiceps; et nous traitons M. fuscator andinus Schulz comme un synonyme plus récent de M. fuscator, syn. nov. Nous avons dressé une clef d'identification des espèces du Nouveau Monde et une liste des espèces à l'échelle mondiale. Monomachus fuscator et M. eurycephalus sont des parasitoïdes du ravageur du caféier Chiromyza vittata Wiedemann (Diptera: Stratiomyidae, Chiromyzinae).

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 136 , Issue 4 , August 2004 , pp. 501 - 552
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnett, R.H. Jr, Samuelson, G.A., Nishida, G.M. 1993. The insect and spider collections of the world. 2nd edition. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC PressGoogle Scholar
Ashmead, W.H. 1897. A new species of Roptronia. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 4: 132–3Google Scholar
Ashmead, W.H. 1902. Classification of the pointed-tailed wasps, or the superfamily Proctotrypidae. I. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 10: 240–7Google Scholar
Azevedo, C.O.Santos, H.S. 2001. Seasonality of Monomachus Klug (Hymenoptera, Monomachidae) in the Biological Reserve of Duas Bocas, Espírito Santo State, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 18: 395–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brèthes, J. 1928. Nouveaux hymenopteres parasites du Chili. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 31: 194–200Google Scholar
Brues, C.T. 1933. The parasitic Hymenoptera of the Baltic amber. Part I. Bernsteinforschungen 3: 4–178Google Scholar
Brullé, A. 1846. Histoire naturelle des insects. Hyménoptères. Tome quatrième. Paris: Librairie Encyclopédique de RoretGoogle Scholar
Cameron, P. 1888. Insecta. Hymenoptera (Families Tenthredinidae–Chrysididae). Volume 1. Biologia Centrali-Americana 33: 1–487Google Scholar
Casolari, C., Casolari Moreno, R. 1980. Cataloghi I — Collezione Imenotterologica di Massimiliano Spinola. Torino, Italy: Museo Regionale di Scienze NaturaliGoogle Scholar
Dalla Torre, CG de. 1902. Catalogus hymenopterorum hucusque descriptorum systematicus et synonymicus. Volumen III: Trigonalidae, Megalyridae, Stephanidae, Ichneumonidae, Agriotypidae, Evaniidae, Pelecinidae. Lipsiae: Sumptibus Guilelmi EngelmannGoogle Scholar
De Romand, B. 1844. Revue du genre Pelecinus, Latr., d'apres les écrits publiés jusqu'à ce jour. Revue Zoologique 7: 97–9Google Scholar
De Santis, L. 1980. Catálogo de los himenópteros brasileños de la serie Parasitica incluyendo Bethyloidea. Curitiba, Brazil: Editora da Universidade Federal do ParanáGoogle Scholar
Diller, E. 1990. Die von Spix und Martius 1817–1820 in Brasilien gesammelten; und von J.A.M. Perty 1833 bearbeiteten Hymenopteren in der Zoologischen Staatssammlung München (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Spixiana 13: 61–81Google Scholar
Johnson, N.F. 1992. Catalog of world Proctotrupoidea excluding Platygastridae. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute 51Google Scholar
Johnson, N.F.Musetti, L. 1999. Revision of the proctotrupoid genus Pelecinus (Hymenoptera: Pelecinidae). Journal of Natural History 33: 1513–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klug, J.C.F. 1841. Die Arten der Gattung Pelecinus (Latr.). Zeitschrift fuer die Entomologie 3: 377–85Google Scholar
Masner, L. 1993. Superfamily Proctotrupoidea. pp 537–57 in Goulet, H., Huber, J.T. (Eds), Hymenoptera of the world: an identification guide to families. Ottawa, Ontario: Agriculture CanadaGoogle Scholar
Masner, L. 1995. The proctotrupoid families. pp 209–45 in Hanson, P.E., Gauld, I.D. (Eds), The Hymenoptera of Costa Rica. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muesebeck, C.F.W., Walkley, L.M. 1956. Type species of the genera and subgenera of parasitic wasps comprising the superfamily Proctotrupoidea (order Hymenoptera). Proceedings of the United States National Museum 105: 319–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musetti, L., Johnson, N.F. 2000. First documented record of Monomachidae (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea) in New Guinea, and description of two new species. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 102: 957–63Google Scholar
Naumann, I.D. 1985. The Australian species of Monomachidae (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea), with a revised diagnosis of the family. Journal of the Australian Entomological Society 24: 261–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naumann, I.D. 1991. Hymenoptera (wasps, bees, ants, sawflies). pp 916–1000in CSIRO (Ed), The insects of Australia. A textbook for students and research workers. Carlton, Australia: Melbourne University PressGoogle Scholar
Perty, J.A.M. 1833. Delectus animalium articulatorum, quae in itinere per Brasiliam annis MDCCCXVII-MDCCCXX jussu et auspiciis Maxilimiliani Josephi I. Bavariae regis augustissimi peracto collegerunt Dr.de Spix, J. B. et Dr.de Martius, C. F. Ph.. Fascicle 3. Munich, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Riek, E.F. 1955. Australian Heloridae, including Monomachidae (Hymenoptera). Australian Journal of Zoology 3: 258–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riek, E.F. 1970. Hymenoptera (wasps, bees, ants). pp 867–959in CSIRO (Ed), Insects of Australia. Carlton, Australia: Melbourne University PressGoogle Scholar
Schletterer, A. 1890. Die Hymenopteren-Gattungen Stenophasmus Smith, Monomachus Westw., Pelecinus Latr. und Megalyra Westw. Berliner Entomologische Zeitschrift 33: 197–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrottky, C. 1911. Neue südamerikanische Hymenoptera. Entomologische Rundschau 28: 2–3Google Scholar
Schulz, W.A. 1904. Beiträge zur näheren Kenntnis der Schlupfwespen-Familie Pelecinidae Hal. Sitzungsberichte der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Muenchen Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse 33: 435–50Google Scholar
Schulz, W.A. 1907. Alte Hymenopteren. Berliner Entomologische Zeitschrift 51: 303–33Google Scholar
Schulz, W.A. 1911. Systematische Uebersicht der Monomachiden. Memoirs of the International Congress of Entomology 2: 405–22Google Scholar
Schulz, W.A. 1912. Zweihundert alte Hymenopteren. Zoologische Annalen Wuerzburg 4: 1–220Google Scholar
Stadelmann, H. 1892. Neue Hymenopteren der Zool. Sammlung des Kgl. Museums fuer Naturkunde zu Berlin. Berliner Entomologische Zeitschrift 37: 235–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szépligeti, V. 1903. Neue Evaniiden aus der Sammlung des Ungarischen National-Museums. Annales Musei Nationalis Hungarici 1: 364–95Google Scholar
Westwood, J.O. 1841. On the Evaniidae and some allied genera of hymenopterous insects. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 7(1): 535–8Google Scholar
Westwood, J.O. 1843. On Evania and some allied genera of hymenopterous insects. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 3 (4): 237–78Google Scholar
Westwood, J.O. 1851. Descriptions of some new species of exotic Hymenoptera belonging to Evania and the allied genera, being a supplement to a memoir on those insects published in the third volume of the Transactions of the Entomological Society. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London (2) 1: 213–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodley, N.E. 2001. A world catalog of Stratiomyidae (Insecta: Diptera). Myia 11 (8): 1–475Google Scholar